Georgia Indictment

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: network dude

When did Garland get demoted to a state prosecutor? When did the President gain the power to control state prosecutors?

wat?

day drinking is bad, m kay.

a reply to: network dude

This is a state case, not a federal case. So I'm not sure why you think Garland is the one who brought charges unless he's now Fulton County prosecutor.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: network dude

This is a state case, not a federal case. So I'm not sure why you think Garland is the one who brought charges unless he's now Fulton County prosecutor.

You are talking about the con artist Democrats.

Willis is under the orders of the top con artists in the party.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

Why would they need psychics? The prosecution knows their case, so they know what's getting presented to the grand jury and it's also kind of their job to be able read a jury. They're going to have a pretty good idea how the jury is going to vote.

They why bother going through the Grand Jury process?

a reply to: DBCowboy

Because it's the law.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: network dude

This is a state case, not a federal case. So I'm not sure why you think Garland is the one who brought charges unless he's now Fulton County prosecutor.

This is all organic. Nobody has had any coms between each other. Bragg is same way. Never spoke to Garland or the office in any way. I bet you believe all that too. Being blinded by partisan politics is quite pathetic.

a reply to: network dude

Latest Headline on CNN www.cnn.com...

Trump Accused of Leading a Criminal Enterprise .

Which means they are trying for a Rico on him . But this makes me wonder ......

In a Rico case the Big man goes down but they can also lock up all of the soldiers as well i.e. MAGA people / Trump Voters .

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

Because it's the law.

So it is the law to waste peoples time to go through the motions for a verdict that the DA already knows is going to happen.

Is this your stance?

It's an odd hill to die on.

So, the Federal Government is a criminal organization? According to the indictment that would be the case seeing as Trump oversees the Executive Branch. They have to define a criminal organization and all they have are meeting with staff members where at no time, not once, have we ever heard that Trump said I will not leave office and will remain by force. Not once.

So WTF can you actually charge him with? This is as bad as the first impeachment, for a phone call, yet we have a sitting president who is using his position to extort and launder money (with dozens of phone calls) and....ahhh, that's cool because no one is afraid of him. He is a freakin clown.

Trump. They are scared of him and know, if he was to ever regain office, he knows the rules now and he has exposed many of them alreadyl.

Now, the one part I have not seen, is in a RICO case you can freeze assets....hmmm.....would they?

a reply to: DBCowboy

It's the law in Georgia that serious felonies must be indicted through a grand jury.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

It's the law in Georgia that serious felonies must be indicted through a grand jury.

Even though they are basically convicted before the Grand Jury votes.

a reply to: RazorV66

The term "Liberal" in politics is used in reference to the Libertarian party... Where most of their tears would likely be an N/A or non applicable as those voter registration and the Voter ID cards from the DMV goes. The next time I'm there and they ask about party maybe I'll just say: The separation of church and state.

a reply to: DBCowboy

If the prosecution has a strong case, they pretty much know going in they're going to be securing their indictment. If they don't have a strong case going in, well they're not usually seeking charges at that point.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

If the prosecution has a strong case, they pretty much know going in they're going to be securing their indictment. If they don't have a strong case going in, well they're not usually seeking charges at that point.

It must be wonderful living in a world where that happens all innocent-like.

What color is the sky there?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy

If the prosecution has a strong case, they pretty much know going in they're going to be securing their indictment. If they don't have a strong case going in, well they're not usually seeking charges at that point.

Ham sandwiches nod in agreement.


Point being, it's supposed to be the duty of the GJ to be the process. Now I think we can all agree that what goes on is a contrived mess that USA's likely loathe because it really is a waste of time largely.

It's just another instance of observable corruption. And once again you find yourself on the side of defending it.

a reply to: JinMI
This is gross and unacceptable

Why did they conveign a jury?
They had the decision and released it before it was ever presented to the jury?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: JinMI
This is gross and unacceptable

Why did they conveign a jury?
They had the decision and released it before it was ever presented to the jury?

It was already explained.

It saves time because; typing pages.

a reply to: shooterbrody

It's in the fifth amendment of the Constitution. Likely GA adopted it as well at the state level. It's supposed to be a check against radical prosecutions. However what it is in actuality is performance and a tool.

A grand jury actually has quite abit of power. And instead of an informed populace using it as intended, it's used by the attorneys for investigatory and subpoena purposes. Instead of being independent they are essentially put on rails.

a reply to: shooterbrody

They had the true bill written up. In order for the grand jury to vote on the true bill, it needs to exist.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

They had the true bill written up. In order for the grand jury to vote on the true bill, it needs to exist.

What part of that involves leaking it to the public?

What if the GJ were to have not returned a true bill?