Georgia Indictment

81 million. Most votes of all presidents….even your beloved Obama.

Tell me again how much you live Biden and Kamala.

Trump is getting singled out for his lack of being in the swamp that is the US government. He scares them. He isn’t them. He is an outsider. You can explain it away with the agenda talking points all you want. The liberal government is an obese hooker looking for a trick.

JHC.

a reply to: JinMI

Believe it or not as is your choice. From the "puff piece".

When she added that last-minute candidate for village trustee to the ballots, she should have updated the counting machines with the new parameters. But she hadn’t. So when the numbers started rolling in, they dropped into the wrong columns. A little over two thousand Trump votes had been shifted to Biden’s column. Her error.

Then when she had tried to fix the issue, entering the correct numbers directly into the central computer, she hadn’t zeroed out the mistaken ones. So she had published a stack of both wrong and right totals.
At last, the night of November 6, the team of people working on the problem had stripped away all the compounded mistakes—they rescanned all ballots—and published the correct tally of votes: a win for Trump, by 3,800 votes. The county board of canvassers examined the results and certified them. The system worked as intended. The mistake had been noticed immediately. It had been investigated and corrected.

I haven't heard of any nefarious findings from the stolen info from 5 voting machines in Michigan. You would think they would have blasted it far and wide.

a reply to: frogs453

she should have updated the counting machines with the new parameters.

Damn those pesky parameters that need updating so votes don't go to the wrong candidates.

a reply to: frogs453

Yes, puff piece.
As your quote above is the 21st paragraph.......


Again, I ask. In what scenario does it make sense regarding voting machines that the input should output the exact opposite of that input?

originally posted by: PurpleFox
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
Trump has the goods, he’s been saying it for years. We’ve finally reached the point where he gets to prove it on a court of law.

Imagine thinking you know more than a past president.

From ABC news, “Sources tell ABC News that Trump's legal advisers have told him that holding such a press conference with dubious claims of voter fraud will only complicate his legal problems and some of his attorneys have advised him to cancel it.”

Starting to seem las if trump may have to cancel his news conference. Shame!

I’m seeing that the vast majority of information that is being used as fuel for his indictments is coming from republicans and people on his staff.

Why are people blaming Dems for his problems?

a reply to: 3000Hard

That advice for Trump seems to be coming from the left.

I would like to see a whole bunch of light shed on the 2020 Georgia election for starters. It could very well be to "domino" that exposes other problems in the 2020 election that could persist if nothing is done to correct them.

Georgia's election was a mess. This is just a summary of some of what was found:

VoterGA.org

WHAT WE FOUND IN GEORGIA

Six sworn affidavits of Fulton counterfeit ballots; (10s of thousands est.)

17,724 more votes than in person recount ballot images required to tabulate votes in Fulton

Drop box video surveillance representing 181,507 ballots destroyed in 102 counties

Improper Chain of Custody forms for 107,000 ballots statewide

Estimated Chain of Custody forms missing for 355,000 ballots statewide

(Georgia Star) 86,860 voters in 2020 have false registration date prior to 2017 but were not on 2017 history file

Over 1.7 million original ballot images are lost or destroyed in 70 counties despite state, federal law

The margin of victory was 11,779 votes, Fulton county alone,was missing over 17,500 ballot images, and the missing chain of custody for 355,000 ballots Statewide is ridiculous.

a reply to: 3000Hard

"Sources tell ABC News"

LOL

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: 3000Hard

That advice for Trump seems to be coming from the left.

I suppose we will have to see if he is taking advice from the left.

Which seems, for him, would be counterproductive.

Blame the left and also take advice from the left.

How does that make sense?

originally posted by: 3000Hard

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: 3000Hard

That advice for Trump seems to be coming from the left.

I suppose we will have to see if he is taking advice from the left.

Which seems, for him, would be counterproductive.

Blame the left and also take advice from the left.

How does that make sense?

Glad to see you are acknowledging that anyone taking advice from the Left would be a stupid idea.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: 3000Hard

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: 3000Hard

That advice for Trump seems to be coming from the left.

I suppose we will have to see if he is taking advice from the left.

Which seems, for him, would be counterproductive.

Blame the left and also take advice from the left.

How does that make sense?

Glad to see you are acknowledging that anyone taking advice from the Left would be a stupid idea.

Right. The overall goal is to make what the current crop of liberals wants, thinks and feels, mean absolutely nothing in the overall scheme of things.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: 3000Hard

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: 3000Hard

That advice for Trump seems to be coming from the left.

I suppose we will have to see if he is taking advice from the left.

Which seems, for him, would be counterproductive.

Blame the left and also take advice from the left.

How does that make sense?

Glad to see you are acknowledging that anyone taking advice from the Left would be a stupid idea.

Seeing as, evidently, the right can’t read anyone would be better off taking advice from the left.

Now I understand why IndieA says the advice is from the left, he/she was taking a stab at the word lawyer.

a reply to: 3000Hard

Judge in Pennsylvania just ruled president trump did not break nay law by stating his views on the election.

BREAKING

a reply to: underpass61

That was sooo cool. Now they have naked coked out LGBT parties....

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: 3000Hard

Judge in Pennsylvania just ruled president trump did not break nay law by stating his views on the election.

Ok.

No one is saying he broke the law by saying anything.

It’s the occasions that he attempted to act on what he was saying is when laws were broken, which the prosecution has to prove.

trump has given up more than enough evidence to bury himself.

a reply to: 3000Hard

The Phone call was edited, the whole case in GA depends on it basically. They cut out 3 words in the call to make it sound like he wanted fraud.

a reply to: 3000Hard

trump has given up more than enough evidence to bury himself.

If you had to show us your smoking gun evidence, what would it be?

Just curious.

a reply to: yuppa

How do you know what was presented to the grand jury? The proceedings are secret.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: yuppa

How do you know what was presented to the grand jury? The proceedings are secret.

Except when they're not.

...like when a foreperson does a media circuit, for example.

a reply to: JinMI

Which the judge said was fine as long as they didn't talk about certain information. Also, that only occurred after the special grand jury was no longer empaneled.

What members of the recent grand jury have been speaking to the press?