It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ABlackCat
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
originally posted by: ABlackCat
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: ABlackCat
So you wouldn't wait until they're any older than twelve? If that's what they wanted?
You mean where they are forcing puberty blockers/HRT on them when they don't want it?
Sure I agree that it's wrong.
Cool we agree on that.
But you disagree we should wait until they are out of adolescence and have more of a grasp on who they are and where they want to go in life?
Let them be who they are. That's the point.
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
originally posted by: ABlackCat
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
originally posted by: ABlackCat
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: ABlackCat
So you wouldn't wait until they're any older than twelve? If that's what they wanted?
You mean where they are forcing puberty blockers/HRT on them when they don't want it?
Sure I agree that it's wrong.
Cool we agree on that.
But you disagree we should wait until they are out of adolescence and have more of a grasp on who they are and where they want to go in life?
Let them be who they are. That's the point.
I understand that and can get behind that.
But another point is a big decision like that should be made in adulthood when one is more equipped to do so.
Do you agree with the average age of consent?
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: ABlackCat
And finally,
Whether or not it comes from potential predators, and whether or not it comes from an element of the trans community, where do you stand on curriculum in schools educating children on how to consent to sexual acts, educating them on how to perform sexual acts, assignments relating to their fantasies or fantasizing about their peers, and encouragement of sex as opposed to practicing abstinence until they are at least of legal age?
originally posted by: ABlackCat
The natural response would be of course to ask you to produce evidence/examples that they are doing that, because, obviously, that's wrong. The parents would be right to be upset about it.
The books in the OP does not do any of those things you described.
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
originally posted by: ABlackCat
The natural response would be of course to ask you to produce evidence/examples that they are doing that, because, obviously, that's wrong. The parents would be right to be upset about it.
I can do that, but need some time. Have to step off here for awhile.
I will come back when I can and provide you some examples.
The books in the OP does not do any of those things you described.
Agreed. I did not see any of that in those particular books.
originally posted by: ABlackCat
It has been a pretty good discussion.
According to the publisher, this book is written for children between the ages of seven and ten years old, an age that is generally pre-pubescent. It’s a colorful book, drawing children’s eyes among many of the other, more scientific and muted books of the biology shelf in the children’s section of the library.
The entire book is framed as a story of a male teacher encouraging students in his classroom to explore their sexuality (pp. 10–15, 156–157). Throughout the book, children are encouraged to discuss sexuality with “trusted adults.”
In one section of the book, touching of sexual parts of the human body are invariably described as “sensitive” and “warm and tingly:”
Additionally, the book specifically advocates masturbation to children:
“Some people think that sexy feelings should only happen in grown-up relationships. And many grown-ups say that sexy is a word to use only when you’re older.” (p.130)
The Center for Garden State Families is alarmed by the age-inappropriate material being forced on minor children who are 9, 10, and 11 years old!
The standards are but guidelines for each individual school district to determine how the standards are to be met. Recently, The Center for Garden State Families spoke to a large group of concerned citizens in a town in the Garden State. A health teacher approached us at the end of the presentation to tell us that the school was considering options and how to teach the masturbation requirement to the fifth-graders.
The teacher was told they may be looking for a “film” to show to the students.
Clinicians reported worries that some patients were referred onto a gender transitioning pathway too quickly.
"Let's pray that I am wrong because if I am not wrong, very many vulnerable children have been very poorly treated and will be left with, potentially, a lifetime of damage here," one says.
As well as seeing young people struggling with their sexuality, staff say some parents appeared to prefer their children to be transgender and straight, rather than gay.
In one example, a GIDS clinician describes a young person who had come out as a lesbian and faced homophobic bullying, "within the family and quite openly in school".
"Suddenly the young person changed their mind and they started identifying as trans."
In some of these cases, clinicians thought that it wouldn't be appropriate for the patient to be referred for puberty blockers, with one child apparently saying: "My mum wants the hormone more than I do.
School institutions in the United Kingdom have set specific lessons aimed at teaching students under the age of 15 about anal sex and orgasms, as well as assigning “masturbation” as homework, MailOnline report.
According to the investigation conducted by the UK-based media outlet, many teachers are ‘indoctrinating’ children with claims about biological sex, presenting gender as fluid, and advancing the narrative that people can be born in the wrong body.
“It comes as the NHS is facing mass legal action from 1,000 families who claim their children were rushed into taking life-changing puberty blockers’ by the Tavistock Centre,” MailOnline said.
The media outlet also noted that graphic teaching materials, including a sex manual for pre-teens, were discovered in classrooms across the UK.
DailyMail added that these concerns arose after a concerned mother was denied the right to see the content of the lessons being taught to her 15-year-old daughter in her Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) classes, which became mandatory three years ago.
originally posted by: halfoldman
So much implied homophobia!
I'll have you in a dress before I have a gay son!