LGBTQ Pride Storybooks in Maryland Public Schools - the battle of national interest

originally posted by: JinMI

Perhaps because they grouped themselves? Lobbied to be grouped as such? Threatened in all manner of speaking to be declared as such?

In that case, we'll never know. *shrugs*

I've never known children to find them sexual. Maybe it is YOU who think those thoughts and is projecting it on me?

I think drag queens are sexual in nature, yes. Evidence by their very definition.

How so? Your only "evidence" is large breasts. Many of them don't even wear large breasts, some even zero.

The direct question I asked you is do YOU think drag queens are sexual generally speaking.

I have already answered. The answer once again is NO. Remember this. NO. NO. NO. NO.

a reply to: JinMI


They don't have a moral or even a logical argument.

It's an agenda plain and simple.

In my opinion.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: ABlackCat

No. I only remember you hurling insults at me, calling me a groomer and such.

Boohoo, turnabout is fair play.

Get what you give, so to speak.

Now that the discussion has been settled, people overreacted to the books that has NOTHING to do with sexuality. That's all there is to it.

This is they hyperbole. This wasn't in the OP but is the prevailing issue at hand among all these threads, which you continue to find yourself on the opposite side of people saying to leave the children alone.....

It's always the same story. Remember those books like Harry Potter and others? Yeah same thing.

In what circles do you find yourself to be in where these false equivalencies make sense?

This wasn't in the OP

Yes it is. Parents think those books are attacking their children so they want to opt out. There is nothing in the books that attack children or indoctrinate them in any way.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: JinMI


They don't have a moral or even a logical argument.

It's an agenda plain and simple.

In my opinion.

Nobody in this thread wants to sexualize children.

What do you think about the child beauty pageant? NOW that's how they sexualize them.

originally posted by: ABlackCat


Yes it is. Parents think those books are attacking their children so they want to opt out. There is nothing in the books that attack children or indoctrinate them in any way.

So you do think you know better for someone else's children than parents do.

Amazing.

I was right.

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: JinMI


They don't have a moral or even a logical argument.

It's an agenda plain and simple.

In my opinion.

Nobody in this thread wants to sexualize children.

What do you think about the child beauty pageant? NOW that's how they sexualize them.

I think you're lying.

As for child beauty pageants?

Start a thread.

a reply to: ABlackCat

In that case, we'll never know. *shrugs*

Except we do know, because I just told you how.

How so? Your only "evidence" is large breasts. Many of them don't even wear large breasts, some even zero.

The "large breasts" were your evidence. Mine would be the definition version of exaggerated feminine features, dance routines and history of course.

I have already answered. The answer once again is NO. Remember this. NO. NO. NO. NO

Then why are their performances historically 18+?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: JinMI


They don't have a moral or even a logical argument.

It's an agenda plain and simple.

In my opinion.

Nobody in this thread wants to sexualize children.

What do you think about the child beauty pageant? NOW that's how they sexualize them.

I think you're lying.

I think you're lying and a groomer.

Now what?

originally posted by: JinMI

Then why are their performances historically 18+?

Because they take in bars?

Geez you make it way too easy. Heh.

a reply to: ABlackCat

Yes it is. Parents think those books are attacking their children so they want to opt out. There is nothing in the books that attack children or indoctrinate them in any way.

LoL!

This makes zero logical sense. If parents think those books are "attacking" their children, then opting out would be the very least they could do.

Saying "LALALAL nuh uh!" isn't an argument.


The OP is pretty short and sweet:

Teaching inclusivity or left wing indoctrination??

Hundreds of families in Maryland have united to protest and demand to be able to 'opt out' of the public school reading list that includes many LGBTQ books through the different grades. Homosexuality and TRANS ideology and other controversial topics are presented as normal and acceptable. (although I don't think homosexuality is all that controversial anymore, there are still families who do not accept it as normal and don't want their children taught that it is). Oral argument was heard in federal brought court by families who want public school officials to respect their right to opt out of the ‘inclusive’ anthology. This case is a model for cases nation wide and so has national interest.

You did read the OP...didn't you?

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

Then why are their performances historically 18+?

Because they take in bars?

Geez you make it way too easy. Heh.

More non answers.

You simply aren't a serious person.


Fine, have it your way.

Stay away from kids.

Pretty simple to me.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

Then why are their performances historically 18+?

Because they take in bars?

Geez you make it way too easy. Heh.

More non answers.

You simply aren't a serious person.


Fine, have it your way.

Stay away from kids.

Back to insults. Sorry but you've lost.

Stay away from LGBT and children. You are hurting them.

Well it seems that the thread is settled.

People went nuts over some children's books being taught in public schools.

Film at 11. Free popcorn.

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

Then why are their performances historically 18+?

Because they take in bars?

Geez you make it way too easy. Heh.

More non answers.

You simply aren't a serious person.


Fine, have it your way.

Stay away from kids.

Back to insults. Sorry but you've lost.

Stay away from LGBT and children. You are hurting them.

That quote really seems to resonate and bother you.

Odd that.

-Stay away from kids.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

Then why are their performances historically 18+?

Because they take in bars?

Geez you make it way too easy. Heh.

More non answers.

You simply aren't a serious person.


Fine, have it your way.

Stay away from kids.

Back to insults. Sorry but you've lost.

Stay away from LGBT and children. You are hurting them.

That quote really seems to resonate and bother you.

Odd that.

-Stay away from kids.

I hear the screeching of a mod.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: JinMI

Then why are their performances historically 18+?

Because they take in bars?

Geez you make it way too easy. Heh.

More non answers.

You simply aren't a serious person.


Fine, have it your way.

Stay away from kids.

That's all anyone wants.

Especially the parents of children.

But like I stated, the left thinks they know how to raise YOUR children better than you do.

We see this time and time again.

Literally on this page, in this thread.

originally posted by: ABlackCat


Yes it is. Parents think those books are attacking their children so they want to opt out. There is nothing in the books that attack children or indoctrinate them in any way.

It's agenda-driven.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Annee

But most pedophiles turn out to be white Christians.

Not likely of the Left.

Seems you are always extreme on your dislike for the White Male...lol

For child sex offenders
22% are Black... The population is 12%
21% Spanish... The population is 19%
48% White.... The population is 58%

violent criminals identify as
60% of as liberal
10% Conservative
20% independent
10% did not say

Need source

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: JinMI


They don't have a moral or even a logical argument.

It's an agenda plain and simple.

In my opinion.

I concur with the good Dr.'s opinion.

I tried, the evidence is here.

My questions remain unanswered so readers can draw their own conclusions.

Wait what? What do parents think those books will do to children?