It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pianopraze
Us ATS Peanuts have debunked more false UFO cases than Ancient Aliens Theorists say yes, shows.
In the interest of not breaking my NDA's, this is my last post on ATS. Because it has gotten pretty hard to stay silent so I am eliminating the temptation. Have fun!
There are zero aliens that have been to earth . It’s all terrestrial technology with ufos as the cover .
originally posted by: putnam6
It seems the retired Rear Admiral is a little less skeptical than the recent CNN OP-ED piece, as well as the ATS peanut gallery. Still seems he is whitewashing the Navy and particularly Naval Intelligence's possible role in covering up these incidences and other UAP phenomena. Who knows he could be asked by the Navy to run lead blocker and misdirection
Makes me wonder, taking at his word he sounds convinced, so much so that I'm thinking misdirection and a bit of downplaying the whole schlemiel
Have we had former top military brass be so open to this discussion before?
thehill.com...
Last week, I had a front-row seat at the hearing of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee’s Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), also known as UFOs. The three witnesses provided extraordinary testimony on their observations of aerial craft with performance characteristics far beyond those of modern aircraft, as well as knowledge of a hidden U.S. government crash retrieval program of such vehicles and their nonhuman operators.
The witnesses were former officers in the U.S. military with stellar service records. Their message to Congress was that we are not alone, we possess technology unlike anything available in the public or private sectors, and the U.S. government has covered up this earth-shattering information for decades.
So how has our society responded? To quote an assessment in Forbes, “the internet shrugged.” After some brief reporting by the major news networks, they returned their attention to nearly full-time coverage of the dismal legal landscapes surrounding Hunter Biden and Donald Trump.
Perhaps the era of fake news has desensitized the public to remarkable revelations like these, so I feel compelled to share my perspective to shed light on their validity and implications.
As a retired U.S. Navy flag officer, I can attest to the integrity and authenticity of the two pilots who testified: retired Commander David Fravor and Ryan Graves. I have served on three aircraft carriers and count many Naval aviators as close friends. These two witnesses are the real deal.
So is David Grusch. As a Navy information warfare officer, I worked closely with the intelligence community and Grusch’s former command, the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency. I too have been read into special access programs, and I understand how Department of Defense classification systems and authorities work. His testimony is 100 percent credible.
It may take time for society to come to grips with this historic hearing, but we will be best served by immediately responding as follows:
1) The U.S. Congress should continue to demand the Department of Defense and intelligence community disclose UAP information, data, and materials to the public.
2) The U.S. government should show leadership in international scientific studies of UAP.
3) The U.S. research community should significantly expand the scientific study of UAP.
Rear Admiral (ret.) Tim Gallaudet, Ph.D., is the CEO of Ocean STL Consulting, LLC , a research affiliate with Harvard University’s Galileo Project, and a member of the advisory board of Americans for Safe Aerospace. He is a former acting and deputy administrator at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), acting undersecretary and assistant secretary of Commerce, and oceanographer in the Navy.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: HUBE007
That’s it, a smoke screen for the ongoing corruption at the highest level
They don’t need a committee, just release all the data
The peanut gallery, anyone who thinks it’s relevant or anything will come of it
originally posted by: TheHiddenFoot
well then show us an alien or show us a UFO. No one cares, we've known they are a bunch of liars for at least 50 years. Gonna take a little more than just a couple people saying what we've already known for years to cover up our collapsing society.
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: putnam6
I originally joined here to discuss what we used to call UFO's and my personal experiences with them with multiple witnesses over the course of my life.
I only did it to find other like-minded people who wanted answers... is it us or them? And if it is them, who is them?
I have been ridiculed over several threads for daring to share my experiences with them before I even joined the military.
Where I learned more things.
Y'all are in for the ride of your life the next few years and yes, it is politically motivated because of bread and circuses but some of us have been trying to tell you for decades.
In the interest of not breaking my NDA's, this is my last post on ATS.
Because it has gotten pretty hard to stay silent so I am eliminating the temptation.
Have fun!
originally posted by: psychotrail
There are zero aliens that have been to earth . It’s all terrestrial technology with ufos as the cover .
originally posted by: putnam6
It seems the retired Rear Admiral is a little less skeptical than the recent CNN OP-ED piece, as well as the ATS peanut gallery. Still seems he is whitewashing the Navy and particularly Naval Intelligence's possible role in covering up these incidences and other UAP phenomena. Who knows he could be asked by the Navy to run lead blocker and misdirection
Makes me wonder, taking at his word he sounds convinced, so much so that I'm thinking misdirection and a bit of downplaying the whole schlemiel
Have we had former top military brass be so open to this discussion before?
thehill.com...
Last week, I had a front-row seat at the hearing of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee’s Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), also known as UFOs. The three witnesses provided extraordinary testimony on their observations of aerial craft with performance characteristics far beyond those of modern aircraft, as well as knowledge of a hidden U.S. government crash retrieval program of such vehicles and their nonhuman operators.
The witnesses were former officers in the U.S. military with stellar service records. Their message to Congress was that we are not alone, we possess technology unlike anything available in the public or private sectors, and the U.S. government has covered up this earth-shattering information for decades.
So how has our society responded? To quote an assessment in Forbes, “the internet shrugged.” After some brief reporting by the major news networks, they returned their attention to nearly full-time coverage of the dismal legal landscapes surrounding Hunter Biden and Donald Trump.
Perhaps the era of fake news has desensitized the public to remarkable revelations like these, so I feel compelled to share my perspective to shed light on their validity and implications.
As a retired U.S. Navy flag officer, I can attest to the integrity and authenticity of the two pilots who testified: retired Commander David Fravor and Ryan Graves. I have served on three aircraft carriers and count many Naval aviators as close friends. These two witnesses are the real deal.
So is David Grusch. As a Navy information warfare officer, I worked closely with the intelligence community and Grusch’s former command, the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency. I too have been read into special access programs, and I understand how Department of Defense classification systems and authorities work. His testimony is 100 percent credible.
It may take time for society to come to grips with this historic hearing, but we will be best served by immediately responding as follows:
1) The U.S. Congress should continue to demand the Department of Defense and intelligence community disclose UAP information, data, and materials to the public.
2) The U.S. government should show leadership in international scientific studies of UAP.
3) The U.S. research community should significantly expand the scientific study of UAP.
Rear Admiral (ret.) Tim Gallaudet, Ph.D., is the CEO of Ocean STL Consulting, LLC , a research affiliate with Harvard University’s Galileo Project, and a member of the advisory board of Americans for Safe Aerospace. He is a former acting and deputy administrator at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), acting undersecretary and assistant secretary of Commerce, and oceanographer in the Navy.
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: ITSALIVE
Oh I’m awake. It’s a psyop. A lie. Who’s closest to the higher beings? Dat all knowing big brother? Lame a reply to: putnam6
are you answering in Haikus?
UAPs - A Haiku
by putnam6
late summer
suddenly DoD admitting
whilst watching the UAPs
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: putnam6
👽
originally posted by: ITSALIVE
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: ITSALIVE
Oh I’m awake. It’s a psyop. A lie. Who’s closest to the higher beings? Dat all knowing big brother? Lame a reply to: putnam6
are you answering in Haikus?
UAPs - A Haiku
by putnam6
late summer
suddenly DoD admitting
whilst watching the UAPs
I’m flattered you think my posts are poetry. Didn’t think I ever had much of a way with words. I’m not sure if I follow yours, is that a complete thought you’ve shared with us?
Oh I’m awake. It’s a psyop. A lie. Who’s closest to the higher beings? Dat all knowing big brother? Lame