Charges added to Trump indictment for having govt records at MAL, a 3rd defendent charged

a reply to: matafuchs

There was missing footage from the footage taken from MAL. The DOJ had to go to the IT company that manages Trump's servers to get all of the footage.

Exclusive-Trump documents case judge made multiple errors in earlier unrelated trial

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The judge in former U.S. President Donald Trump's upcoming trial over his handling of classified documents made two errors in a June trial, including one that potentially violated the defendant's constitutional rights and could have invalidated the proceedings, according to legal experts and a court transcript.

DC Jury pool

a reply to: MetalThunder

Not sure what DC has to do with a case in Florida.

That said, Cannon wasn't qualified for a judgeship when she was appointed by Trump and she still isn't. She made that absolutely clear in the special master case.

Trump's lawyers have filed a motion to have a SCIF re-established at MAL (but so many on here said that Trump had an active SCIF at MAL) because he's too lazy to drag his ass to the courthouse to review classified documents.

If Cannon indulges this request, this may be the one that sends the DOJ to the 11th Circuit. A judge ordering the Executive Branch to establish a SCIF seems like a gross overstepping of separation of powers.

a reply to: Threadbare

Re-establish

reestablish
verb
To restore to a previously operational state.


Uh

a reply to: shooterbrody

It hasn't existed since Trump stopped being President. So how does that save him in the documents case like you guys were trying to claim?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

It hasn't existed since Trump stopped being President. So how does that save him in the documents case like you guys were trying to claim?

I’m not sure where your used to posting at, but “you guys” is exactly who?
As you provided no source.
We do sources here new person.

a reply to: Threadbare

Not sure what DC has to do with a case in Florida.

Well, thats where the GJ is from.

Thats where the warrants were originated.

Thats where the agents came from.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

It hasn't existed since Trump stopped being President. So how does that save him in the documents case like you guys were trying to claim?

So, who let Trump back in the WH after his term was over? What documents, since he left, did he have control of?

If it was under his watch, he can do what ever the hell he wants with them.

Or, is he responsible for documents AFTER his term was up?

a reply to: Threadbare

Is this in the indictment? An actual line that says the DOJ contacted the IT company? Because is true, the liability would lie on the IT company if something is missing local or off site. One of the guys mentioned, #4 I think, is the guy who said he could not do it.

a reply to: Threadbare

Wouldn't that be called Checks and Balances. There is a reason for 3 parts of our government right?

a reply to: JinMI

The grand jury that indicted him (twice) in the documents case is empaneled in Florida.

a reply to: matafuchs

There's checks and balances but also separation of powers. The courts can order the Executive Branch to do something if they're not violating the law or the Constitution.

Matters of classification fall under the control of the Executive Branch and there are no laws, Constitutional articles, or amendments that require them to provide a defendant in a CIPA case with a SCIF in their domicile.

a reply to: Threadbare

So...about this then:

Judge Aileen Cannon on Monday asked the Justice Department to explain its use of an out-of-state grand jury in the Mar-a-Lago case.

The demand came in response to a duo of filings submitted under seal, which Cannon directed a clerk to strike from the docket.

The Justice Department “shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district,” she wrote.

[url=https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4141743-judge-cannon-questions-use-of-out-of-state-grand-jury-in-mar-a-lago-investigation/]Link[/url ]

a reply to: Threadbare

Matters of classification fall under the control of the Executive Branch

Read that again...real slow like....

a reply to: JinMI

The documents case covers multiple jurisdictions, therefore grand juries are needed in multiple jurisdictions.

What are your thoughts on Cannon's judicial misconduct by revealing the existence of a grand jury in an unprompted motion that's is seemingly based on a Fox News interview given by Trump's former lawyer?

Does that sound like an impartial judge or even a qualified one to you?

a reply to: Threadbare

The documents case covers multiple jurisdictions, therefore grand juries are needed in multiple jurisdictions.

But wait, you literally just said:

The grand jury that indicted him (twice) in the documents case is empaneled in Florida.

You don't get to have morality arguments with me.

You've demonstrated on multiple accounts to be a hypocrite, disingenuous, lying hack.

Stick to the facts.

a reply to: JinMI

The two indictments that have been handed down came from the Florida grand jury. There's still an active grand jury in DC that has not handed down any indictments yet.

I don't get what's confusing you.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: JinMI

The two indictments that have been handed down came from the Florida grand jury. There's still an active grand jury in DC that has not handed down any indictments yet.

I don't get what's confusing you.

Then why is Cannon demanding "an explanation for and out of state grand jury?"

Lol

a reply to: JinMI

Because she's an idiot that watched a Fox News interview with Parlatore.