It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AlienBorg
originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: AlienBorg
As long as vaccines have passed all the safety protocols and are proven to be effective and beneficial for children I see no reason why kids should not be vaccinated.
Perhaps a deeper dive into the issue would expose an agenda few are aware of, such as the Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
There's an excellent article on American Thinker that's very enlightening.
In 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (HR5546). This is an historic act because it removed liability for childhood injury vaccines. Removing liability tends to alter the behavior of entities that benefit. Indeed, it turned out that pharmaceutical companies were no longer liable for injuries caused by their products. That has been the law since 1986.
Attorney Siri says that he knows of no other product that has that kind of immunity. Not planes nor drugs. But since 1986, big pharma has not had any market force check of any significance. “Think of all the products out there that warrant safety precautions, and the one you give immunity to is the one you give to babies. Think about that.”
It turned out that in the years leading up to Congress’ 1986 Act, the amount of liability that pharmaceutical companies were facing from injuries far exceeded the revenue that those products accumulated. Manufacturers went bust or withdrew from the market. You would think that the typical and responsible action would be to simply make a safer product for any remaining pharmaceutical company. That’s how market forces work. However, Congress decided that they did not have to make a safer product. Instead, they could continue to sell harmful products and would be granted immunity to boot, thereby evading a lawsuit from anyone. Equally as awful, they made this law for any vaccine made for children from that day forward.
Subsequent to Congress’ ruling, drug companies now lacked the incentive to understand the safety profile for their vaccines before they were licensed. When it comes to other medical drugs, drug companies are very interested in knowing the safety profile because they are not immune in these cases. In the event of injury, they may very well have to pay for damages. But with vaccine clinical trials, there is no concern. Since the Vaccine Injury Act, Congress created the economic basis for this attitude. Pharmaceutical companies can make their money while taking the path of least resistance. And that path corresponded with the loosening of practices connected to clinical trials.
You can read more here:
[www.americanthinker.com...]
As long as vaccines have passed all the safety protocols and are proven to be effective and beneficial for children I see no reason why kids should not be vaccinated.
P.S. Remember the mRNA was said to have passed all safety protocols and one shot would protect us from Covid. FDA, CDC, the government and all involved agencies have lost credibility. That equates to a lack of trust in a huge number of people to believe in any organizations in charge of 'helping' us stay healthy through pharmacutacles.
It's straight forward.
Pharmaceuticals should be liable for all harms caused by their products.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy
You obviously don't live in a blue state.
I live in California. You? You're in Oregan, right?
Illegals get a pass for practically everything.
Examples please.
Migrants not required to get COVID-19 vaccine at detention ...
VERIFYThis.com
www.verifythis.com... › verify › immigration › n...
Sep 21, 2021 — Immigration and Customs Enforcement says it “cannot force individuals in detention to be vaccinated” but does encourage vaccinations.
It didn't matter that I had provided all documents necessary to get the initial license. And no new or changed information. Had to go and get replacement documents for the originals I had initially shown.
Migrants not required to get COVID-19 vaccine at detention ..
As of May 2022, sixteen states and the District of Columbia allow immigrants who are unable to provide social security to get a modified driver’s license. These states include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Virginia, New York, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Vermont, Oregon, and Washington.[1]
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: RonnieJersey
We hear about these things and worse all the time.
originally posted by: RonnieJersey
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: RonnieJersey
We hear about these things and worse all the time.
If this isn't special treatment, I don't know what is. Laws which Americans must follow, and none for everyone else.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: AlienBorg
Edit: My bad seem to have been confusing Mississippi with Missouri. LoL
Mississippi doesn't look much better through given it still seems to be one of the 5 states that have no official minimum age, where underage marriage is still possible with either parental consent or court approval.
So not really any wonder they are willing to entertain religious exemptions for childhood vaccinations.
In April, U.S. District Judge Sul Ozerden ordered Mississippi to join most other states in allowing religious exemptions from childhood vaccinations
If you think exemptions are necessarily a bad idea think of the Covid mandates or the possibility of mandating these bogus vaccinations for kids who have effectively zero risk from the disease.
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: AlienBorg
If you think exemptions are necessarily a bad idea think of the Covid mandates or the possibility of mandating these bogus vaccinations for kids who have effectively zero risk from the disease.
Perhaps polio will return to Mississippi. The anti jab sentiments will vanish fast once the crippled kids start being born.....again.
.
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: AlienBorg
If you think exemptions are necessarily a bad idea think of the Covid mandates or the possibility of mandating these bogus vaccinations for kids who have effectively zero risk from the disease.
Perhaps polio will return to Mississippi. The anti jab sentiments will vanish fast once the crippled kids start being born.....again.
As long as vaccines have passed all the safety protocols and are proven to be effective and beneficial for children I see no reason why kids should not be vaccinated
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: AlienBorg
I don't imagine Mississippi is the only state to allow exemptions from vaccinations or other medical procedures.
However, vaccines help prevent illnesses like Diphtheria, Flu, Hepatitis A & B, Chickenpox, Measles, Mumps, Polio, Meningococcal, Rubella, Whooping Cough, and many other preventative diseases, other than just COVID 19 AlienBorg.
Plenty of risks where the likes of the above illnesses and children are concerned that can be severely mitigated via a simple injection aka a vaccine.
Each to their own would be my thinking on the matter.
If people don't wish their kids to be vaccinated, well good luck to the little fellows, I'm sure god will protect them.
And if not, well that's their parent's fault who obviously did not pray hard enough.
originally posted by: nickyw
a reply to: andy06shake
god doesn't even come into it in the uk since it all has to be done through consent, no consent no jab.. its one of the reasons the uk struggled with the idea of mandatory jabs even with front line nhs staff.