It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why virology might be pseudoscience.

page: 2
11
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 12 2023 @ 08:07 PM
link   



posted on Jul, 12 2023 @ 08:26 PM
link   
And yet you all need to search the internet to prove your imaginary theory because nobody here actually works the the virus themselves to know what's what. Carry on ignorant.



posted on Jul, 12 2023 @ 08:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Nothin

lol, imagine believing a video claiming rabies isn’t real when the death rate is 100%.


Yeah !

That would be nutz !

Ever see such a thing ?





posted on Jul, 13 2023 @ 05:31 AM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

The existence of viruses has been well-established and accepted by the scientific community for over a century anonentity.

With extensive research, experimentation, and evidence to support the existence and understanding of viruses.

Viruses can be proven to exist through various scientific methods such as microscopy, culturing, molecular techniques, serological testing, and epidemiological studies.
edit on 13-7-2023 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 13 2023 @ 06:09 AM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

Spouting an accepted opinion does not prove anything. It is the same as "safe and beneficial" it means nothing ... show me a picture of the covid virus. Taken with an electron microscope. I think you will find it is all computer modeling



posted on Jul, 13 2023 @ 06:23 AM
link   
a reply to: anonentity



Spouting an accepted opinion does not prove anything.


The various methods i listed, extensive research and experimentation regarding the field of study, do however indeed prove the existence of viruses.



It is the same as "safe and beneficial" it means nothing


Science aka "the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained" means rather a lot.



show me a picture of the covid virus. Taken with an electron microscope. I think you will find it is all computer modeling


So you don't believe in electron microscopy nether?

You do realise that just like with viruses, the features on modern microprocessors, are too small to easily see with even the most powerful conventional microscope and that electron microscopy is required where design and construction is concerned.

Do you dispute the existence of microprocessors also?

As to me showing you a picture of the covid virus, can you not find one on your beloved Bitchute?

edit on 13-7-2023 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 13 2023 @ 05:36 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

Well basically you have told me that the evidence for an actual virus existing as a physical state of matter is circumstantial evidence. Something like a belief structure ruled and pontificated on much like the pope in Rome does for religion.If the model was correct in the scientific form , then a simple cold should have been a memory years ago.



posted on Jul, 13 2023 @ 08:58 PM
link   
I doubt you have children, but given the fact that you will call every picture of a virus from an electron microscope a fake, I present you with a scenario. It's summer time, and your hypothetical kid is in summer school. A cold is going around said school. Kid catches cold, brings cold home, and you, hypothetical wife, and hypothetical other children all have a cold. What caused all of this?

I look forward to the answer containing stuff about 5g, toxins, and vaccines.



posted on Jul, 13 2023 @ 10:01 PM
link   
a reply to: LordAhriman

I look forward to a picture of a cold virus from you, which isn't a computer-generated image.



posted on Jul, 14 2023 @ 03:47 AM
link   
a reply to: anonentity



Well basically you have told me that the evidence for an actual virus existing as a physical state of matter is circumstantial evidence. Something like a belief structure ruled and pontificated on much like the pope in Rome does for religion.


Take from it what you will but i never told you anything of the sorts.

Science and religion are somewhat different beasts you see.

The former requires observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against evidence obtained.

And the latter a leap of faith and complete obedience, never mind your monies and attendance in spades. Where asking questions is frowned upon and likely to get you ostracised from the group, or worse.



If the model was correct in the scientific form , then a simple cold should have been a memory years ago.


Why?

There are over 200 known types of rhinoviruses, and they have the ability to mutate rapidly which makes it difficult to develop a single cure for the cold.
edit on 14-7-2023 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2023 @ 04:45 AM
link   
a reply to: anonentity



I look forward to a picture of a cold virus from you, which isn't a computer-generated image.


What you need to understand is that cold viruses, such as the rhinovirus, are very small, typically measuring around 30 nanometers in diameter.

Which is much smaller than the wavelength of visible light, which makes taking pictures using conventional light microscopes an almost impossibility with the current technologies we have at our disposal.

Can you show us a picture of oxygen molecules?

You won't be able to, and for the very same reason, and yet you believe in air.

edit on 14-7-2023 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2023 @ 05:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: LordAhriman

I look forward to a picture of a cold virus from you, which isn't a computer-generated image.
Define computer generated image.

You know, if you take a selfie on your smart phone, then display the photo of yourself you just took, the image that appears on the display is generated by a computer which converts digital information into an image, so depending on how you define computer generated image, you can call that such. Is that image not proof you exist because it's generated by a computer?

What about electron microscopy? That uses electrons instead of photons to produce the image. Sam Bailey who claims there's no evidence for viruses shows one of those images of a COVID virus, and then she just denies it's a virus (she refers to some paper that doesn't refer to the image she shows, and she doesn't even source her image), but you can even see the spikes or "club-shaped surface projections" that are characteristic of the Covid virus in her image, which resembles this image, with source:

www.cdc.gov...


edit on 2023714 by Arbitrageur because: clarification



posted on Jul, 14 2023 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

How do you explain AIDS then? Is that just a psychological illness?

Let's hope bitchute don't post a video saying santa claus is real, or else who knows where you'll end up.



posted on Jul, 14 2023 @ 05:12 PM
link   
a reply to: jamespond

AIDS never existed until Fauci started to make a medicine for it.



posted on Jul, 14 2023 @ 05:19 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

You're a piece of work fella, and really need to give your head a wobble.

You don't believe in viruses, you don't believe in AIDS, but you do believe in Bitchute.

www.hiv.gov...
www.ecohealthalliance.org...#:~:text=In%20Africa%2C%20HIV%E2%80%93the%20virus,early%20in%20the%2020th%20century.&text=To%2 0date%2C%20the%20earliest%20known,was%20then%20the%20Belgian%20Congo.
www.news-medical.net...



posted on Jul, 14 2023 @ 05:31 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

Then spin this, what does isolated actually mean as a definition, because that is what it comes down to? www.bitchute.com... This is not hyperbolic it is a factual account.



posted on Jul, 14 2023 @ 05:40 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

This has been done to death years ago now.

www.reuters.com...
fullfact.org...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

Anyhoo were we not on to AIDS?

As to it being a factual account, well a ""factual account"" hosted on a social media platform known for hosting far-right individuals, conspiracy theorists, anti-vax lunatics, and hate speech.......And on a channel, the owner has disabled the comments on the video, that may well be.


edit on 14-7-2023 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2023 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

Blah blah blah but nobody has supplied a physical sample, because they are unable to find one. Fact Checkers ...please give me a break.



posted on Jul, 14 2023 @ 06:21 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity



Blah blah blah but nobody has supplied a physical sample, because they are unable to find one. Fact Checkers ...please give me a break.


Yada yada yada

Says the big bitchute fan.

Anyhoo past my bedtime, up early tomorrow.

Have fun, and try not to catch a cold.........which i can only imagine you think to be some kind of a bacterial infection or whatnot.

Im away to my scratcher.



posted on Jul, 14 2023 @ 06:27 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

You just shamed all the face diaper supporters


priceless
+bookmarked

edit on 7142023 by MetalThunder because: NOt SHY



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join