Why virology might be pseudoscience.

The campaign of "'no virus" has been gaining traction, and there are real reasons for this. As some serious people are in this camp.Even though trying to get a sample of a virus does not seem to be forthcoming in any detail. If one was to listen to this interview, the conclusion if such a thing as a virus was real it would be one of the greatest moneymakers ever thought up. It would also be if such a thing did not exist as well. So is the whole science of virology a money-making scam? Like the man said if you have had a few PCR tests you might well get a stuffy nose." Prove it exists and then prove it causes a disease" not been done. www.bitchute.com...

a reply to: anonentity

I’m sick and tired of all the “rabies” crisis actors. It’s a psyop to make people afraid of getting bit by animals who are acting insane, clearly an attempt to make us scared.

Another stellar thread backed up by real evidence. Keep them coming.

a reply to: anonentity

If viruses are a hoax, what are all those secret biolabs in Ukraine doing?

a reply to: Sookiechacha

The same thing Norton antivirus did?

a reply to: anonentity

So, computer viruses are hoax too?
LOL...okay

Wow.

It's witchcraft! Humans have known that disease is caused by curses and evil spirits for thousands of years. Science is merely modern superstition.

"A Pox on Ye!"

a reply to: anonentity

So i guess Electron Microscopy, which is an essential tool in the detection and analysis of viruses is also a hoax?

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Don’t be like that. That’s a horrible reply and you know it. Don’t troll here please.

a reply to: DaRAGE

Pfft.

Please explain to me what Norton VIrus protection did.

And btw, I'm not the one conflating a computer virus with an organic virus, like Small Pox or Measels, and claiming they're all fake and manufactured by TPTB to control humans and make lots of money.

Moulds Are real.
you get bad ones in a wound your are dead!
or lose a leg are arm.

So could what they Say is virus be just mould!
Yes it will get into the body to.
by the nose, mouth and other ways!
Just like they say a virus will!

have you ever had a gut upset, diarrhea?
see the patterns?

a reply to: buddha

Mold is a living organism. An argument can be made that virii are not.

As was pointed out above, electron microscopy. We know what both molds and virii look like. They are vastly different.

a reply to: anonentity

We gotta get over this Virology™ BS™, if we are to advance as a society, and to get back to real science, instead of believing in Science™.

A farewell to Virology : Dr. Mark Baily.

This essay contains three parts. Part One outlines some of the history of virology and the failures of the virologists to follow the scientific method. The many and far-reaching claims of the virologists can all be shown to be flawed due to: (a) the lack of direct evidence, and (b) the invalidation of indirect “evidence” due to the uncontrolled nature of the experiments. The examples provided cover all major aspects of the virological fraud including alleged isolation, cytopathic effects, genomics, antibodies, and animal pathogenicity studies

Part Two examines the fraud used to propagate the COVID-19 “pandemic.” A breakdown of the methodology relied upon by the original inventors Fan Wu et al., shows how the fictional SARS-CoV-2 was “created” through anti-scientific methods and linguistic sleights of hands. It is part of an ongoing deception where viruses are claimed to exist by templating them against previous “virus” templates. Using SARS-CoV-2 as an example, the trail of “coronavirus” genomic templates going back to the 1980s reveals that none of these genetic sequences have ever been shown to come from inside any viral particle — the phylogenetic trees are fantasies. The misapplication of the polymerase chain reaction has propagated this aspect of virology’s fraud and created the ‘cases’ to maintain the illusion of a pandemic.

Part Three provides an analysis of how some key participants, “health” institutions, and the mainstream media maintain the virus illusion through information control and narratives that parrot virology’s claims. By way of happenstance, the virological fraud now finds itself front and centre of the COVID-19 fraud. From here, however, it can be critically appraised by those outside virology and the pseudo-scientific paradigm virology has built around itself can finally be dismantled and laid to rest.

The aim of this essay is to provide refutations to various claims that pathogenic viruses exist and cause
disease. SARS-CoV-2 has been used as the main example but the principles apply to all alleged viruses. What follows addresses virology’s often arcane literature on its own terms, which, it should be said, may make parts of this essay somewhat heavy reading. However, it is hoped that this contribution will fill a niche for the reader seeking a more technical understanding of the virus hypothesis as it seeks to expose the very foundation of purported pandemics and fraudulent medical practices. The threat of virology to humanity is increasing so it is time we bid farewell to these destructive pseudoscientific practices and free ourselves from unnecessary fears.

( Many thanks to the Viro-Lie-gy website for pre-packaging those quotes. )

a reply to: Nothin


The Truth About Viruses - Dr. Sam Baily

a reply to: Nothin

lol, imagine believing a video claiming rabies isn’t real when the death rate is 100%.

You get some weird people on that BitChute site.

OMG lol. What a Great, Concise way you did that there.

Commendable.
Poignant as hell. Way to “pull the bandaid” off retardation most quickly.

gosh what a good example


People who haven’t seen a rabies victim video:

1. Lucky in a way (in lieu of “ignorance is bliss”)
2. Are retarded and terribly cruel to the reality that lies just outside their Idealism
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Gotta love a nobody

Jumping on a hip bandwagon akin to Flat-Earth,
Who feels IN-ANY—WAY pompous and puffed up by hitching his belief to one “Scientist” over the other

One group over the other.

Kiiiiinda gross, man.


a reply to: Nothin

a reply to: Theuncutblock

Rabies is real, but to prove that a virus is the cause of it might be very problematic. Remember stomach ulcers, it has taken rather a long time to find the bacteria responsible. Then take the Covid virus not one country has come up with a lab sample outside of a computer simulation. All they do, when asked, is follow a scripted dogma.

a reply to: Theuncutblock

Pompous ?

Pompous : you say !!

LoL !

Just posting food for thought, for those still stuck in little thought boxes, prefilled by Accredited™ Authorities™.

We ain't hitched buddy : we freestyling !