It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Ectoplasm8
It seems your stuck on a physical ET. What about a non-physical ET? It seems like you are basing intelligence on the notion there is a learning curve associated with it, that something has less intelligent has to precede something more intelligent. Yes, here on Earth this is true; some would call it evolution. How can we conclude that intelligent life doesn't just pop into existence without a evolutionary timeline?
Some of the oldest known objects in the Universe embody unexplainable phenomenon. Take for example quasars at the edges of the observable universe. If Hubble's law is correct, the angular motion of these objects is several times the speed of light which defies the laws of physics as we humans understand them. Okay, a quasar is a physical thing, but something created a quasar, and before quasars there wasn't a whole lot of physical stuff to create anything. So, "what" intelligence did this? Sure, we can say God did it, but honestly "God" is often used as an excuse to explain lots of things we humans can't explain. Again, this isn't a statement about theology, or atheism, or religioin, but one of pure intelligence.
Bottom line...we're not thinking big enough. I think @Terpene hit it on the head...'we're just not that intelligent'.
originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Ectoplasm8
It seems your stuck on a physical ET. What about a non-physical ET? It seems like you are basing intelligence on the notion there is a learning curve associated with it, that something has less intelligent has to precede something more intelligent. Yes, here on Earth this is true; some would call it evolution. How can we conclude that intelligent life doesn't just pop into existence without a evolutionary timeline?
Some of the oldest known objects in the Universe embody unexplainable phenomenon. Take for example quasars at the edges of the observable universe. If Hubble's law is correct, the angular motion of these objects is several times the speed of light which defies the laws of physics as we humans understand them. Okay, a quasar is a physical thing, but something created a quasar, and before quasars there wasn't a whole lot of physical stuff to create anything. So, "what" intelligence did this? Sure, we can say God did it, but honestly "God" is often used as an excuse to explain lots of things we humans can't explain. Again, this isn't a statement about theology, or atheism, or religioin, but one of pure intelligence.
Bottom line...we're not thinking big enough. I think @Terpene hit it on the head...'we're just not that intelligent'.
I am stuck on physical beings because that is what supposedly visits us in physical spacecraft. Four foot beings with large heads. Of course large skulls to contain the large brains they must have. Which is BS thinking because Einstein and Isaac Newton had normal sized heads but just able to use parts of their brains more effectively than we did. That's a human way of thinking.
We could be visited right now by superior intelligence able to seem invisible by bending light waves around themselves. If they are able to travel the Universe they are obviously more technologically advanced than us. If they don't want to be seen they probably wouldn't be.
There could be amoeba-sized intelligence able to travel star to star simply. It could be part of their makeup and abilities and an every day type of thing. Of course the possibilities are endless.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
From an Earth-dweller perspective, I think we humans are way out in left field if we're looking for ET in any sort of a form which we humans recognize.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
So then you're agreeing with me? Because, this is exactly what I have been saying since my OP. I thought you were taking exception to the premise(s) I was laying out.