It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: 1947boomer
I'd say there is no chance you would ever give any consideration to the idea that your advocacy has been based on lies and may have resulted in people taking a drug that has no real clinical benefit and many demonstrated serious harmful effects.
This same tech has been used for targeted reproductive control. It is known to effect the female reproductive system when deployed as part of the COVID mRNA vaccines. This is happening and has been reported on, it is not in dispute... yet it gets ignored.
The refusal of vaccine advocates to acknowledge that these facts merit concern and deserve investigation are part of the reason that most of the population no longer cares what COVID vaccines advocates have to say. Even the paid ones on TV. There's a list of reasons, but lack of intellectual honesty is the primary factor in each. This same thing has happened with every now confirmed "conspiracy theory" that was obvious in data for any kdy that cared what the truth is.
All you've done is make excuses why the most common factor between a number of observed population-wide increases in detrimental effects can't be responsible. Excess deaths, decline of birthrates, rare cancers in young people, heart attacks and stokes, all just happen to have started increasing in the months after the vaccines were deployed, but not during the logarithmic infective phase of the pandemic when there was no immunity. These things are not happening in countries that did not have high rates of vaccination for COVID. Of course many of those countries also don't have persistent problems with COVID like the highly vaccinated countries. Hard to explain that one, no?
But hey, maybe people just decided not to have sex forever. All because they got a mild respiratory illness. Let us not forget the people of reproductive age are all in incredibly low risk categories for COVID if they avoid taking the mRNA therapy. So, millions of people that got asymptomatic or mild flu symptoms decided to stop having sex. It doesn't make sense to me, but I may be biased by being an enjoyer of sex.
At the height of the AIDS crisis people were still having unprotected sex in bathroom stalls, but COVID managed to get people to stop having sex with their partner for the purposes of reproduction? Sound right to you or are you maybe experiencing a sunk cost fallacy with dramatic psychological repercussions that are clouding your ability to consider the entirety of data objectively?
Maybe a babystep. Do you think the number of serious conditions associated with vaccination deserve study for causation beyond making excuses and saying it can't be true? If so... can you explain why it's being ignored by those responsible, people asking about it are censored at the behest of government/pharma sponsored fact-checkers, and the information is being withheld from qaulified third parties who want to analyze it?
Click the bottom link at the end of my comments, they put a couple of equal signs in the URL.
First off, I'm all for a birth rate decline in the world, as should everybody else if they know what's good for them and their descendants.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: MrInquisitive
First off, I'm all for a birth rate decline in the world, as should everybody else if they know what's good for them and their descendants.
IF, and it's a big "if", the climate doom sayers are correct....then there's really no point in people having children only to see them die of heat stroke, starvation and dehydration. The fewer the kids, the fewer to die from Global Warming.