On July 26th 2023 Hunter Biden Will Confirm or Deny the Laptop is His.

a reply to: network dude

No different than a car left at a shop, mechanics lien if they don’t pay or leave it.

I think his admission was when he went after the dude legally for sharing private data, can’t do that if it’s not yours. And you can’t get upset if you forfeited your own data, just like I can’t sue websites for selling my stuff after I sign their T&C.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: butcherguy
The revelation is that Hunter has a very low probability of winning a lawsuit against the shop owner, since the shop owner did not release any info that belonged to Hunter. He released info that was his property.

BTW, you stated that Hunter previously admitted that “it’s his”. ‘It’s’ is a contraction, standing for the words ‘it’ and ‘is’. It is no longer his, therefore ‘was’.

Releasing someone's nudes without their permission is illegal, regardless of how they obtained the nudes.

I don’t think so. Not when the nudist throws them up
in the air and leaves them all over the ground. They become the property of whoever walks by and picks them up.
It’s like putting your nekkid butt on the internet and whining when they go all over the place.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: network dude

No different than a car left at a shop, mechanics lien if they don’t pay or leave it.

I think his admission was when he went after the dude legally for sharing private data, can’t do that if it’s not yours. And you can’t get upset if you forfeited your own data, just like I can’t sue websites for selling my stuff after I sign their T&C.

yep. But perhaps we missed something, I'm always good for a lesson.

a reply to: network dude

He saw what was on the laptop, the pictures, the information etc. Yet still handed it over to whoever instead of contacting someone who represents the bidens. That's the definition of being a rat.

The finer details of hunter himself signing off is rather sketchy as well. Maybe I'll pay attention to this one since it seems ATS will hang onto this story like every other move the Bidens do with their family business ventures.

a reply to: strongfp

Oh! Rat as in snitch and we all know snitches get stitches?

But you don't care, do you?

(Besides the dick pics there is evidence of other crime and pics of women young enough to encourage the laptop be turned over)

you sound butthurt about it all to me for some reason. Why is that?

originally posted by: butcherguy
Even if he did, no problem.
Hunter signed a release.

Nope. It's considered revenge porn, and it's illegal. If your ex willingly gave you naked pictures, you can't post them online after you break up even though they are still your property.

a reply to: LordAhriman

And that worries you more than selling out your country. Ok

Which part of your source supports your claim in the thread title?

The closest line is the following which is not what your thread claims.

Hunter Biden is expected to make his first court appearance on July 26.

www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: strongfp

what did the shop owner do that was dishonest in your opinion?

a reply to: LordAhriman

'Releasing' is a mushy term. if you suspect evidence of criminal activity, which there was plenty, even youngish females, then what are you supposed to do? that's what he did.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Besides the dick pics there is evidence of other crime and pics of women young enough to encourage the laptop be turned over

You've analyzed a plethora of personal Hunter Biden pictures from this laptop?

a reply to: stevieray

I wonder sometimes too. and why foreigners care is always a surprise

a reply to: strongfp

I have viewed some of the pics that have been brought to attention because of evidence of crime, yes, and evidence in text format.

Got a problem with that?

I'm a 67 year old grandma, dicks don't impress me much

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

What crime?

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: CoyoteAngels

What crime?

Stuff with minors. When the original dump happened, a lot was rolling around for a few days. There is pretty obvious juvenile (family member) stuff as well as the well-known Obama girl pics with her credit card and coke after getting busy. The guy literally can't help but take pics of himself.

Plenty of people have put the pieced together and even reported it to the authorities. It was one of the reasons Guilliani gave when he turned it over to Delaware SP, but they just passed it on to the FBI who already had copies of it and we know they didn't even look at it because they said so. Some of the other pics take a bit of sleuthing like, hey that girl wearing only a necklace but you can't see her face happens to have the exact necklace and same manicure as his niece in the next pic.

www.nationalreview.com... the group behind this has sanitized the pics, but since you asked, the definite crimes are the juvenile stuff. Text messages and business corruption are only illegal if you are on the wrong side, so that will have to play out, but the kid stuff should have been dealt with immediately.

The fact that they have done nothing with that is absolutely disgusting.

a reply to: Halfswede

the definite crimes are the juvenile stuff. Text messages and business corruption are only illegal if you are on the wrong side, so that will have to play out, but the kid stuff should have been dealt with immediately.

So the website that has over 10,000 personal photos of hunter bidens junk omits the real incriminating stuff?

It's been quite a while since his personal baggage has been unwillingly aired out for everyone to see, why haven't we seen his supposed criminal activity yet? I mean I'll admit I browse some of the most unsavory parts of the web for information and I haven't seen anything yet.

a reply to: strongfp

Drug use. Young females. Discussions on email suggesting kickbacks or bribes. you know all this.

a reply to: strongfp

Nvm

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

So it's all up in the air?

Drug use isn't a crime worth worrying about, the females in his photos are assumed prostitutes, and his role as a professional is litterally a lobbyist, and lawyer for foreign energy company's tied to the US, the Biden family has ties to foreign energy for decades, hunter founded a large equity firm in China to strengthen US markets into China, and served as a legal representative in Ukraine for an energy company. How is that illegal ?

Where was the uproar when GOP members were getting hand over fist from Haliburton profits from Dick Cheneys efforts in the middle east?

a reply to: strongfp

we wouldn't be where we are now without the laptop. That is the text messages that are starkly evidence of selling influence.

I'm not playing diversion games. Create a Halliburton thread if you do.