Corrupt DOJ Gives Evidence of What They Say Are Donald Trump Crimes - to His Lawyers.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: matafuchs

We've known for a while now that Trump's lawyers were unable to turn over the document in question when they were asked to by the DOJ.

What document is that?

a reply to: SourGrapes

The document Trump was taking about in the audiotape. Try and keep up.

a reply to: Threadbare

This one:

www.cbsnews.com...

Seems this document might not even exist!

a reply to: Threadbare

Try and get it right. Tell me how an audio tape of someone talking about some documents that are not linked to a case, or one of the 31 counts he was indicted on, means anything. If the document is not listed then it is not something the government needed back that he had.

a reply to: matafuchs

It does not show that he knew he had classified info and could not declassify, that belonged to the government and that he was willing to show random people?

That definitely gives credence to him knowingly, purposely hiding and obstructing other documents found at MAL. It's actually very concerning that his lawyers could not find the document he referenced.

a reply to: matafuchs

Wrong. There are any number of reasons why a document is not included in the indictment. Including the classifying agency stating that the document is too sensitive to use in the case.

a reply to: Threadbare

So, even you don't know what document it is?

Try and keep up!

a reply to: Threadbare

So, it is so sensitive they do NOT want to hold him responsible? Do you know how stupid that sounds? 31 counts of having classified documents but the one considered too sensitive is not included in the indictment. Isn't there a postponement for the lawyers to get cleared?

For the last time,If they KNOW he has something that sensitive he should already be in jail and I would have no problem with that.

a reply to: frogs453

So did he just travel to NJ with random documents to show people? I have not seen a good answer to this.

a reply to: matafuchs

So, it is so sensitive they do NOT want to hold him responsible?

Correct. In order to hold him responsible they would need to share the sensitive information with the defense, the jury, and the judge. If the information is sensitive enough, the classifying agency will decide the document cannot be used in a trial because doing so would be too great of a risk.

a reply to: matafuchs

He split his time between two places. Nauta's texts in the indictment indicate Trump would ask for boxes to go through. Boxes were moved from MAL to Bedminster according to the texts.

Who knows why he had them there, I mean it wouldn't have been due to the fact that he had enemies of Iran coming to visit Bedminster in a few weeks, right? Coincidence I'm sure.

trump just might have run his mouth once to often...now his CIA security is testifying about the documents.

www.nbcnews.com...

a reply to: Threadbare

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Then they provide a redacted version.....

a reply to: olaru12

You mean the other grand jury investigating the same thing but in DC?

a reply to: matafuchs

And if the whole thing would need to be redacted?

a reply to: Threadbare

Who cares. Redact the whole thing and leave TOP SECRET at the top. It would not be the first time this was done.

So it seems in the recorded interview the document Trump was holding was a New York Times article, and the document in question doesn't even exist and isn't one of the 31 that the DOJ is saying he had. The recording has been used out of context to "get Trump" once again. How stupid do some of you feel for like the 30th "we got him" event that was 100% faked with each one, or do you have some upper limit before you do?

a reply to: Xtrozero

That's not what one of the witnesses says. Unfortunately for Trump, the incident is immortalized in Meadows' memoirs. The writer describes Trump producing a four page document written by Milley detailing a theoretical US invasion of Iran.

You also must have missed the news today that the DOJ is prepared to indict Trump on up to 40 more charges, possibly in multiple venues. It seems to me if this document were to be involved in a case it would be one brought in New Jersey.

originally posted by: Threadbare

That's not what one of the witnesses says. Unfortunately for Trump, the incident is immortalized in Meadows' memoirs. The writer describes Trump producing a four page document written by Milley detailing a theoretical US invasion of Iran.

You also must have missed the news today that the DOJ is prepared to indict Trump on up to 40 more charges, possibly in multiple venues. It seems to me if this document were to be involved in a case it would be one brought in New Jersey.

You can only hope... They do not have a document in question, so kind of stuck there.

a reply to: Threadbare

A superseding indictment. Yeah. We got to get him with something. If they are even considering this that means the case in FL means nothing. Do you not understand that?