Redacted Coverage of Recent Shocking Dr. Greer UFO Disclosure

a reply to: Fairtrade141

I sure as F do not believe a word out of Steven Greer's mouth.

Can you provide us with a Bud Lite Moment rational reason so as to NOT believe Dr. Greer? I would really like to know.

a reply to: KnightSeeker

They are single and ready to Mingle

I watched Dr Greers presentation last night.
I have flip flopped on my view of him over the years,going from being suspicious of him to more lately thinking the guy is actually legit.
I have no doubt those who want to keep things as they are would try to discredit him-and those very people in the world of black ops are experts at disinfo campaigns-and they have huge resources and do not operate within the law.

Anyway even when I was unsure about Dr Greer himsef- I understood that my view of that one man should not make me view ALL of his many witnesses/experiencers the same way.
The huge amount of highly credible military people who have come forward at great risk of being deemed "crazy" (or worse)seem to be genuine for the most part-and they tell parts of a story which all fits together with other whistleblowers.

Also-these witnesses are prepared to testify in congress(or a civilian RICO case)-so if they lie,that means prison.
Why would they take such a risk?

The aims of getting open source clean alien technology out of the shadows would completely change our future-and intsantly take away the power and control of the evil ones who wish to keep us enslaved-the bankers,the WEF,the 0.1%

All their plans for a great reset/social credit/borg like future turn to dust if this happens-
Is it any wonder Dr Greer is under constant attack?


This was a decent take on the recent Grusch revalations-Chris Lehto spitting serious venom at everyone who is involved in this multi decade coverup!

"Its over! You Are DONE!"



I really hope you are right Chris!

originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: Fairtrade141
Can you provide us with a Bud Lite Moment rational reason so as to NOT believe Dr. Greer? I would really like to know.

Do you mean like when he posted a photo of a moth and tried to convince people it was an alien?


Or how about the time he took a picture of a bush, gave it a name, and said it was an alien he had been talking to? This is the original image of the bush:

Greer photoshops that and then calls it an alien and says he talks to it, and it talks back or so he claims, LOL:

www.abovetopsecret.com...
Greer's movie that thread talks about was just a sales pitch for his money-making scheme for the naive and gullible to collectively pay him lots of money to download some silly app based on his lies and or delusions.

Or how about the tours Greer gives of "invisible space ships"? You pay big money to go to those, but you can't see anything because there's nothing there. But he burns some incense so you can smell something and if you're on drugs then you can imagine the invisible spaceship he talks about might really be there, next to the pink elephant and purple cow. I linked the video of Greer's "invisible space ship" in this post.

UFO believer and author Leslie Kean co-authored the seminal articles in the New York Times about the Pentagon UAPs, and more recently the David Grusch whistleblower story, and she will apparently latch on to anything remotely credible in the UFO field to write about it. She talked about Greer's disclosure project and how in addition to some reliable and credible UFO witnesses, Greer indiscriminately added others completely lacking in any credibility whose stories aere obviously problematic, so when Kean saw those "crackpot" witnesses included, she realized she needed to distance herself from Greer, to maintain her own "credibility" in the UFO field, not that she has any significant credibility with me or others who have analyzed her stories closely like Greenstreet. If Greer doesn't have enough credibility for Kean, does he have enough credibility for anybody? Look at the stories Kean tells:

The UFO Lie: Shocking truth of Pentagon AAWSAP program | The Basement Office

a reply to: Arbitrageur

you forgot being able to call invisible interdenominational spacecraft at will. but don't point lasers it's dangerous.
the description says it takes soft eyes to see them, i say it takes a soft grasp of reality and sfb believing anything greer is hawkin.



the soft gray matter of the gulla bills never ceases to amaze me. people like greer and other fakers just screw up the whole study and belief of extraterrestrial existence.




ETA: my bad, you did post it. i was so interested in showing how big of a huckster greer is tghat i didn't read you whole post before writing mine.

anyway, there use to be a member here that would post that video in every greer thread or even at the mention of the name. and would always say it would have been more believable if he would have had a guy running round the field and pretend to run into it and play a loud bong sound.

This line in your comment caught my eye - "It is exciting to see the issue coming to the mainstream and being treated with more credibility than ever before." I personal find it suspicious. My inbox is all of sudden stuffed with "anything" UFO. To me it seems like they're setting the stage for something. Something like what we've been hearing lately, a false flag with a UFO invasion.

a reply to: Arbitrageur



I did a Google search on your three pictures and the Hong Kong video. [snipped]

I looked at the Hong Kong video. His claims seem to be in alignment with Dr. Jacques Vallee recent take relating to ET and other dimensions. Scam is your opinion. Nothing less and nothing more. I am surprised that you didn't mention Dr. Greer's orange UFO watch off the coast in Florida. I saw the video of him and his paid for customers. We see them for free here in South Carolina. They head towards the Hartwell, Georgia region and go up into space. The last one we saw would NOT let us video it. So I trust Greer on the UFO's off the coast of Florida.

Jacques Vallée "UFO, Trinity, Aliens, Religions, Consciousness"

Jacques Vallée "UFO, Trinity, Aliens, Religions, Consciousness"

Greer may be spiritual. Many here on earth are. I can tell your not as your one and done. Meaning if the guy or girl just once soils himself your against him or her for life.

You should buy this book as it explains why brilliant people soil themselves. Its a means of staying alive

Mind Games

I am not about to write Greer off. He also works with Dr. Garry Nolan of Stanford University. I will write you off. Bye

Garry Nolan

a reply to: Waterglass
But can you see after pushing fake pictures as real and not only that but charging outrageous fees to see this, that someone would doubt anything Greer does? I understand frustration that when you think Greer does something legit these fakes will always be brought up but to think that he can push fake Alien photos as evidence and not be looked at with doubt from now on is not reasonable. That's why you never push anything that you are not absolutely certain is real out into the public because the internet doesn't forgive and to make a profit off fakes is even worse. Do you really think Greer thought a moth or bush was an alien? Can people change? sure but you can't get angry at those that point out what this guy was once promoting and expect everyone to just forget about that and now trust Greer whole heartedly. You choose not to write off Greer and that's fine, but you shouldn't fault those being done with Greer or get angry at those who do.

originally posted by: ARM1986
Truly advanced aliens would be dangerous to us only in the sense that we would be pretty much pointless to them. Like ants or other bugs. Maybe a passing curiosity but little more. I’m not even certain that such aliens would even bother with visiting. Maybe only as a cataloguing exercise. By the point of such advancement they would pretty much be able to synthesise their own raw materials.

The aliens we are likely an attraction for are either not true aliens at all or are from far nearer than we think. They may also not be THAT far in advance of us. A 1000 years, a few thousand. They might not necessarily be benevolent. All depends. Either way a race 100 years more advances than ours could likely wipe us out in short order. So I imagine, if they wanted to, they would have.

Greer might be right. They might all be benevolent or at least neutral.

Alright, I hate this type of argument.

We are not insects. We are sentient beings. That's the difference and an advanced civilization would know this difference here also. Ants don't know they are even alive, they are insects that don't think about life, they act out the purpose of their existence, end.

An advanced benevolent civilization would find us and study our civilization. They would probably try to steer us in a direction for advancement, probably, but not saying for sure.

Also, the argument of distance... distance only applies when you are physically there. If these are portals or wormholes or interdimensional technologies were talking about, then the distance between is merely location for coordinate based travel, the time it takes for getting there could be minutes or hours or seconds for all we know. Physical distance is not an issue... heck, we could have portals in the oceans for all we know, could be a technological device no bigger than a soda can.

Time is another thing that doesn't truly make sense. We know certain areas in the galaxy / universe where time is different. In OUR time, an alien civilization could be even younger than US, but have 10's of thousands of years advancement on us because of their location. Where they are, 1 year for us could be 100 years for them. It's really a weird thought, but the physics sort of indicate this is a strong possibility.

originally posted by: HrdCorHillbilly
a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2
even if only one of their stories is true... wow!

I agree. U2 intercept? Missiles shot at a U2 being tracked by a UFO? Human/drug trafficking by black ops? Holographic projectors of other craft? Floating megastones? Antarctic UFO tracking station? Holy Jesus! BS on the earthquake tie in.

originally posted by: The GUT

When you think about it it's the ultimate MacGuffin (a device from the Alfred Hitchcock toolkit.)

Bad aliens, good aliens, God-like aliens...

Whatever is needed to corral, fleece or thin the herd.

Interesting times. My early alert system is screaming "Incoming."

Found the Vietnam pilot account pretty intriguing mate but suspect you've hit the nail right on the head there.

Lots of related articles recently but here's the best one I've come across ('narrative prepping' and 'COG').



THAT UFO NARRATIVE PUSH: COG, MONEY, MARKETING, & OTHER STUFF

originally posted by: Asktheanimals

It certainly looks like the public is being primed for an alien invasion scenario. Look for more "official" whistleblowers" to be telling their tales of encounters in the coming weeks. Project Bluebeam may happen yet.

Looks that way mate and although the mythology of Project Bluebeam gets brought up in the vid below some of the modern day 'touchable' hologram tech is insanely impressive.

Also brought up are Laurance Rockefeller’s extremely curious antics with Greer, Kissenger, Podesta and the Clintons (and the still semi restricted 'Special Studies Project').

We all know about the crude pie-plate-on-string UFO hoaxes that have been perpetrated in the past. But what if I were to tell you the greatest UFO hoax of all time is being prepared right now, and it has Rockefeller backing and UN /Vatican /presidential support?

Source Links

a reply to: keenmachine

I mentioned previously read the book Mind Games by Richard Thieme. In brief unless you want to bring forth factual evidence and live you must present it as fiction or do something to discredit yourself so your NOT suicided or simply disappear. His book gets that point in before page 50.

He is also a hired speaker to the CIA, FBI, DEA, DHS, Customs, SS, and many other agencies

Notice that trend? How about Robert Lazar? How about

The USA and the Deep Sate within will go all in to protect the National Security of the USA. What I mean is that we are all expendable. That includes the President.

George Knapp recently soiled himself. IMO he is way above top secret in credibility. So was Lazar.

a reply to: Brotherman

You can skip through that. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

a reply to: Klassified

Fair enough. But if you cared to listen in, you'd learn that it's primarily about exposing the Deep State, including their human trafficking operations and world domination plans. In hindsight, I wish I explained that in the title and OP.

originally posted by: Asktheanimals
It certainly looks like the public is being primed for an alien invasion scenario. Look for more "official" whistleblowers" to be telling their tales of encounters in the coming weeks. Project Bluebeam may happen yet.

That is one of the big take aways from this. I get the impression that this is planned for next hear, hence the urgency for the Disclosure Project to fight for truth and change as quickly as possible.

From the last Disclosure Project event:

a reply to: KKLOCO

I feel the same as you do. Yeah it seems like the Shadow Government has been existing as a sort of ultra-high-tech society of their own.

a reply to: visitedbythem

If it goes to congress...maybe things might change?

a reply to: nugget1

I'm wondering that myself. These days, it's hard to know who you can trust.

a reply to: BeNotAfraid

Oops, sorry. I hadn't noticed the matter being discussed. I focused on the Redacted coverage of the event tho. I only just watched the actual event.

a reply to: Skeletonized

I find them credible too. From both disclosure events.