Propulsion system distorting the INTERIOR dimensions of the craft

Once the starship has landed...it extinguishes the plasma shield by magnetism (????)

a reply to: Erno86

No thanks. Have you not seen the documentary Event Horizon?!!!!!!

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Erno86

No thanks. Have you not seen the documentary Event Horizon?!!!!!!

No...what about it?

Micro mini black holes should be entirely save to use for fusion powered electric generating power plants here on Earth and starships as well --- Save for gamma radiation waves --- Which can be safely shielded by a water blanket.

It's not some mad scientists dream --- However, we must be cautious.

a reply to: Erno86

en.m.wikipedia.org...(film)

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

In theory...mankind should be able to harness the polar jets being emitted from a spinning micro mini black hole and use as a source of propulsion; as it's directed towards thruster outlet tubes on a starship at near the speed of light.

a reply to: Erno86

Trouble is, maneuvering or braking at near relativistic speeds without some form of inertial dampening is going to turn any occupants of said starship into strawberry jam?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

So an answer to my question is as follows…..

How fast does the ISS travel per hour?

about 17,500 miles

The ISS travels at about 17,500 miles/28,000 kilometers per hour. At this speed, the ISS orbits the Earth every 90 minutes, which gives the crew 16 sunrises and sunsets every day. Since humans have been living and working on the space station, it has orbited Earth tens of thousands of times.

Yet the astronauts in zero gravity weightlessness are able to live at that speed.

So I then think to myself……if the ISS was traveling that fast in our gravity atmosphere…..the astronauts would have to be scrapped off the switches and buttons.

So then UFO occupants that purportedly travel in those high speeds….appear to continue living not having to be scrapped off their own instrumentation panels.

Similarly to the ISS in operational theory……could it be that UFO occupants create a weightless zero gravity within their craft to avoid the G-Forces traveling through our atmosphere that would otherwise crush them within the craft?

Zero gravity within the craft would essentially be like inertia dampening within the craft?

A crazy thought yes….but a reasonable thought nevertheless.

👽

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: play4keeps


Look forward to your response to questions posed by Mahogany.

He'll need time to google the questions from Mahogany.
We may not hear from him for a while, due to the possibility that one of Mahogany's
questions, will purposely lead him down an an erroneous path.

'He staggered back out after being in there a couple of minutes, and outside it was four hours later,' he said. 'There was all kinds of time distortion and space distortion.'

That's the wrong type of time dilation. Yeah it's no wonder all the occupants were dead.

Do you think they can control the speed of time inside the craft?

Maybe normally it runs slower inside, but for some reason they had to speed it up, and they all died from old age?

Seems like quantum space does not have distance between things. What ever things are in Quantum space. If ship interior somehow exists at a state between Quantum and our reality, that could explain?


Quantum is the singularity and the matter and energies that make our reality “project” from there where there is no time. What exists here does not exist in the quantum we are a product with our own laws of physics.

If ship interior can exist in between then size has no limit.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

That is not relativistic speed, ie a significant percentage of the speed of light.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

It's a matter of inertia not gravity.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

No no no and no Just to clarify there is gravity on the space station. The effects of gravity is what keeps it in orbit. Technically the space station is not zero G it's just in a constant free fall. It is constantly falling towards the earth its speed is why it keeps missing as the earth has moved before it can slam into the ground.


Now to do this on a space ship you would need alot of mass for it to orbit think planet or moon. So it's not going to stop space aliens from splatting on the interior walls.

If you wanted to prevent this you need negative energy. This goes back to Einsteins equation of energy is mass. If you could figure out how to create negative energy then you can offset the mass of the vehicle. If you do that and can get it to zero you will automatically travel at the speed of light no engine needed.
The other important thing to remember about relativity is that things in an inertial frame *always* look normal from the point of view of an observer in that frame. So when we see a craft distorted by traveling the speed of light to an outside observer it will appear smaller while the people inside wouldn't see a change to their craft.

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: play4keeps

Larger inside than on the outside.

Dr Who's Tardis it is then.

Bah, that's just a rip off of Gay Deceiver, a spaceship that was modified by the good witch Glenda in the land of Oz.

a reply to: alldaylong

Oh shoot, I was hoping to mention the Tardis first!

a reply to: tanstaafl

I think the Dr would have dated Glenda, but he has the better ride.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: tanstaafl

I think the Dr would have dated Glenda, but he has the better ride.

Admittedly I'm not a Dr Who fan so cannot compare, but it would have to be one helluva ride to even come remotely close to beating out Gay Deceiver (for anyone who doesn't know, this is from Robert Heinleins fantastic novels, specifically, 'The Number of the Beast'.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Oh my! You should watch the remakes of Dr. Who. Starting with the 9th Dr. (my fav) Christopher Eccleston, the 10th was nicely done by David Tennant, and then the 11th, a haunting role played by Matt Smith.

You need to have a sense of the absurd and the woo is pretty hysterical but the underlying storyline of the relationships between Dr. Who and his 'companions' is complex and harkens back to "Time Enough for Love" my fav Heinlein. Dr Who and Lazarus Long are similar archtypes in my psyche.

You might enjoy it for that reason, it's all over the streaming services. Highly rated series when these 3 played the Dr.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: tanstaafl

Oh my! You should watch the remakes of Dr. Who. Starting with the 9th Dr. (my fav) Christopher Eccleston, the 10th was nicely done by David Tennant, and then the 11th, a haunting role played by Matt Smith.

So, skip everything before these?

I'm honestly not sure why I never got into it. I do recall trying to watch it a long time ago, but for some reason it just didn't take.

You need to have a sense of the absurd and the woo is pretty hysterical but the underlying storyline of the relationships between Dr. Who and his 'companions' is complex and harkens back to "Time Enough for Love" my fav Heinlein. Dr Who and Lazarus Long are similar archtypes in my psyche.

You might enjoy it for that reason, it's all over the streaming services. Highly rated series when these 3 played the Dr.

I may put it on my play list... I wonder if it is on Netflix or Prime?