10,000 Images Leaked From Hunter Biden Laptop

a reply to: socialmediaclown

May be a bit off topic, but Prince Harry admitted in his book "Spare" to taking weed coc aine and magic mushrooms. But didn't declare that when he applied to emigrate to the US.

Should that not get him kicked out?

I'd have thought so.

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
How's that?

There is absolutely no law in which one can be prosecuted for being filmed doing drugs. Drug laws are possession, manufacturing, and distribution. Which one would this be?

We know he is doing real drugs in those pictures and videos, but there is no way to prove it in court.

a reply to: LordAhriman

I didn't claim he'd be prosecuted. I said technically you can be arrested for doing drugs on video. And that's of course if you're caught. I didn't say that people do get arrested or even that it's common. I said you can and that was in response to the claim that you can't.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Way off topic.

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
I said technically you can be arrested for doing drugs on video.

No you can't.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
I said technically you can be arrested for doing drugs on video.

No you can't.

If you're streaming your drug use on video into an underage forum you probably can be arrested.

People are illegally arrested all the time.
Interesting some sell that does not happen.

originally posted by: carewemust
If you're streaming your drug use on video into an underage forum you probably can be arrested.

I doubt it, but who is doing that? What would the charge be?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
People are illegally arrested all the time.
Interesting some sell that does not happen.

Not saying you're wrong, but who would illegally arrest the son of the president?

a reply to: LordAhriman
Whatever butthole cop that wanted to.
Interesting you selling cops don’t illegally arrest people.

a reply to: LordAhriman

Why not?

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
a reply to: LordAhriman

Why not?

We've already addressed that.

a reply to: LordAhriman

We? No I don't think you have.

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
We? No I don't think you have.

Username checks out. 🤡

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: LordAhriman
Whatever butthole cop that wanted to.
Interesting you selling cops don’t illegally arrest people.

What? They do. Too often.

a reply to: LordAhriman

I get it. You want attention.

originally posted by: stevieray

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: TheMadTitan
I am surprised people showed up to defend poor hunter.
There are a lot of sick people today.

Meh, same people who loved Avenatti and Juicy Smellit. Cohen and Blaise Ford. Gascon and Bragg.
Need I go on ?

Ah , Please " Go On " Stevieray , PARTY ON !

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: ASrubWhoDiedAgain

[Quote]Im actually not surprised that adults think that government (or anybody ) has a non existing technology that can index and make sense of the unfathomable amount of data that is the internet in any reasonable time period.

nsa.gov1.info...

Background
The Utah Data Center, code-named Bumblehive, is the first Intelligence Community Comprehensive National Cyber-security Initiative (IC CNCI) data center designed to support the Intelligence Community's efforts to monitor, strengthen and protect the nation.

Our Utah "massive data repository" is designed to cope with the vast increases in digital data that have accompanied the rise of the global network



Yes. We. Can.
-Love, the NSA.

You linked a datacenter. Google has them. So does Amazon. Rackspace. The list goes on. The existence of a data center (they've existed for awhile now) has nothing to do with the post you replied to.

No you (not even the NSA) can't.
-Love, someone that understands the science.

I used to think your name was “a scrub”.
Did it change for Mandela Effect ?
Is it supposed to be ASSrub ?

Whatever happened to that “analbumcover” guy ?

a reply to: ASrubWhoDiedAgain

The original claim was that what is on the internet stays on the internet. That's not true, governments and private groups have various censorship methods to suppress, block or remove information.