10,000 Images Leaked From Hunter Biden Laptop

a reply to: CrawlingChaos

I don't need to have first hand knowledge. I'm simply guestimating the odds of Hunter soliciting sex from an underaged prostitute. Without fully delving into the statistics, I found data that states a minor is exploited in the sex industry every two minutes which indicates the numbers run high. Hunter spent tens of thousands of dollars on prostitutes. I don't know what the going rate is but I assume that amount of cash can buy up thousands of hookers. So statistically speaking, what are the odds that Hunter had sex with a minor or minors? I'd say the chances are fairly high.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: carewemust
Every U.S. Vice President should have an official advisor who was kicked out of the Navy for being a Cocaine Addict.

Oh, I didn't know that Hunter had an official government position. That changes things. Enlighten us!

I just saw him listed as an advisor in another location. I suppose it's whatever you want it to be as usual.

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
a reply to: CrawlingChaos

I don't need to have first hand knowledge. I'm simply guestimating the odds of Hunter soliciting sex from an underaged....

He did not solicit sex directly, you are correct there... He solicited sex to be arranged, from a foriegn madame which whom was red flagged, outside of the country; Through an illegal multistate prostitution ring...

Sir, those odds got better. Not worse.

originally posted by: Tough2fool

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
Right. Because these people have no means to censor, stifle, destroy, hide, lie about, obfuscate or detract data. They have no power at all to hide their crimes. They are totally transparent. They disclose everything to the public!

What's on the internet, is always on the internet. There would be no way to hide it. Campaigns would be in place to make them be held accountable for their crimes. Believe me, I've been on the good guy end of it. The dark web will ruin your life for far less crimes.

Things get taken off the internet all the time . You are wrong there . I’m surprised an adult would think that . You said you troll in forums , I think we all already know that . You don’t have to tell us , we can see just fine

Of course things can be removed from the internet on a per domain basis. There exists no such technolgy that would prevent someone that that had a local copy of whatever content that was removed fron domain A simply adding said content to domain B. Over and over again. See the pirate bay and other sites like it.

Im actually not surprised that adults think that government (or anybody ) has a non existing technology that can index and make sense of the unfathomable amount of data that is the internet in any reasonable time period.

LordAhriman, you will never get proof of the allegations of pedophilia.

a reply to: ASrubWhoDiedAgain

[Quote]Im actually not surprised that adults think that government (or anybody ) has a non existing technology that can index and make sense of the unfathomable amount of data that is the internet in any reasonable time period.

nsa.gov1.info...

Background
The Utah Data Center, code-named Bumblehive, is the first Intelligence Community Comprehensive National Cyber-security Initiative (IC CNCI) data center designed to support the Intelligence Community's efforts to monitor, strengthen and protect the nation.

Our Utah "massive data repository" is designed to cope with the vast increases in digital data that have accompanied the rise of the global network



Yes. We. Can.
-Love, the NSA.

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
Just because you personally haven't seen what you deem "evidence" floating around the internet, doesn't mean there is no evidence. There is no conclusive evidence that you are aware of. Which doesn't mean much.

That's a REALLY convenient stance for you guys!

Just because there is no evidence floating around the internet showing that you punch babies, doesn't mean that there is no evidence!

Hunter is a crackhead, idiot, criminal, sex addict, probably many other bad things. Garbage, piece of sh1t human being. I'm not defending him. But pedophilia is about THE WORST thing someone can possibly do, and using it as just an insult is sickening.

If you have evidence, change my mind.

a reply to: LordAhriman

If you have evidence, change my mind

That's a really convenient stance for you guys!

Just because there is no evidence floating around the internet showing that you punch babies, means that there is no evidence!

Hardly using it as an insult. Hunter Biden is a lawbreaker including the high probability of soliciting sex from minors. Or the pimp of minors.

originally posted by: socialmediaclown

This is America. Innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.

That requires evidence. Anything, whatsoever that could count as evidence would help you here. Whatcha got?

a reply to: LordAhriman

I got about as much as you've got. Vouching for his character. Making the claim that even through he's a grade A scumbag who had sex with thousands of hookers, he never not once touched a minor because you didn't witness him do it with your own eyes.

He's been found guilty of using illicit drugs.

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
I got about as much as you've got.

So nothing. What you want from me is proof that nothing doesn't exist. That's not how it works. Double negatives are a no no for a reason.

originally posted by: socialmediaclownVouching forhis character. Making the claim that even through he's a grade A scumbag who had sex with thousands of hookers, he never not once touched a minor because you didn't witness him do it with your own eyes.

Never. Not even once. You're making things up now.

Well... it didn't just start now, but now you're making things up about me with pages of evidence against you.

originally posted by: socialmediaclownHe's been found guilty of using illicit drugs.

Again, I DO NOT CARE! Do drugs, bang hookers, live life like you want to live it unless it hurts someone else. If it hurts a kid, you deserve death.

a reply to: LordAhriman

Well you're still here defending his innocence either way you want to look at it. I'm fairly certain drug possession is against the law.

a reply to: LordAhriman

I agree with you. Hunter's degenerate behavior has nothing to do with being a pedophile unless he was actually sleeping with minors.

Right-wingers have beeing adopting "pedophile" and "groomer" as insults the past couple years and they don't realize that its just going to dillute the actually seriousness of it.

Eventually no one is going to take accusations of real pedophilia serious if they just think its right wingers throwing petty insults at people they don't like.

Pedophilia and grooming is a serious accusation. It's tiring to see it thrown around so carelessly. Ive seen people on ATS call others "groomers" or "pedophilia supporters" for simple taking the side of trans people on a social issue.

I have no idea if hunter is a pedo or not, but this whole "all leftists are pedos because i dont like them" makes the right look absolutely retarded.

a reply to: socialmediaclown

Drug possession and using hookers is a slap on the wrist if anything. As it should be. No one should face jail time for using drugs or consentual paid sex. Yea, its gross to buy young (adult) hookers but its not pedophilia.

I hope people keep looking into Hunter. I can imagine he's probably got even deeper dirt on him. But when people jump to conclusions and assumptions as truth and start posting conspiracies about it across the internet that are debunkable - it only gives ammo for the MSM to just say "look this stuff about hunter or whoever has been debunked as silly baseless conspiracy theories" and create predictive programming for regular everyday folk to think everything else related is BS.

a reply to: Turquosie

Drug possession and using hookers is a slap on the wrist if anythin

That depends. People serve prison for possession of marijuana.

No one should face jail time for using drugs

That maybe so but it's inconsequential. ATM, we have laws.

Yea, its gross to buy young (adult) hookers but its not pedophilia.

Sex with a minor is against the law.

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
Sex with a minor is against the law.

You seem to have a reading comprehension problem. Did you not see this person specifically say "...young (adult) hookers"...?

The arguement, as touched on, is plain wrong. It isn't 'is Hunter a pedophile'. A pedophile by definition targets children, specificly.

No, Hunter is an oppurtunist, not a pedophile. He bangs, whatever the Ukrainian Madame brings him. If thats a minor... well we can see from his texts he demands he "gets his moneys worth".

The man would have absolutly no issue committing the act. I have little doubt given time, it'll surface like a boiled (anthony) Wiener...

a reply to: CrawlingChaos

Good point. The pedophile definition was brought up earlier but it was ignored.

Noun
pedophile (plural pedophiles) (American spelling)

(psychiatry, sexology) A person aged 16 years old or older who is mostly or only sexually attracted toward prepubescent children.

a reply to: daskakik

Yes, I should have just responded to the tailend of that statement

but its not pedophilia

by saying that sex with minors doesn't automatically mean that you fit the criteria of a pedophile but it does make you a criminal.

a reply to: Turquosie

Ive heard Jim Jordan called Gym and pedophile by the LEFT hundreds of times on social media. And the fakenews about Jordan was about collegiate wrestlers! not even minors!

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
Yes, I should have just responded to the tailend of that statement

but its not pedophilia

by saying that sex with minors doesn't automatically mean that you fit the criteria of a pedophile but it does make you a criminal.

If they are adults, which they specified and your reading comprehension kept you from registering, means it would not be pedophelia or a crime.

Why is that so hard for you to see?

ETA: The tail end of that statement came after they said adult hookers. Do you think cherry picking part of their statement and lopping off that part where they said "adults" makes you right?