NASA to hold historic public meeting about UFOs TODAY

a reply to: combatmaster

Yeah i am in the same boat. I don't even believe aliens have been to earth or at least somewhat r3cently.. All i see now when i see NASA come out with a stunt like this or any material that is sourced from these so called official channels is a play l used when it suits them.

a reply to: noonebutme

The truth is too much to handle for most people!

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

One thing is obvious…..neither NASA or the FAA have a dedicated office to handle UFO’s UAP’s....(that we know of 😉)

Yes mate, as for other agencies
John Greenewald Junior basically shows below how NORAD are lying through their teeth just by citing their own documents (the part where he nails NORAD about CIRVIS Military pilot UFO reports is around 0:15:00).

“Moreover, reports of unidentified flying objects which could affect national security are made in accordance with JANAP 146 or Air Force Manual 55-11, and are not part of the Blue Book system.”

Document

originally posted by: combatmaster
a reply to: noonebutme

The truth is too much to handle for most people!

Said by someone who doesn’t know it. How can you know that an unknown cannot be handled by those you don’t even know?

a reply to: karl 12

Easynow good to see you mate and yes it truly was - what a pantomime lol.

Thanks! Same to you !

It Really was an insult to intelligence lol

The fact that there's nobody on the research team that's a UFO-Experiencer (Someone ProUFO & experienced the phenomena) ... tells me everything I need to know about their "Scientific" approach ... lol

originally posted by: karl 12

originally posted by: easynow

Watched parts of it and as expected it was painful to watch lol

Easynow good to see you mate and yes it truly was - what a pantomime lol.

Haven't seen Major Oberg for a while but was reminded of this letter from Colonel Senn to Lieutenant General Crow of NASA regarding (the prevention of reopening) international UFO investigations,

September 1st, 1977:

link

Completely contradictory as ever suppose the NASA Info Sheet selling the line that 'no government agency has engaged in UFO research since 1969' is also worth a repost.

Especially as there are completely contradictory documents found in this book.


PDF File

The research went to private entities connected to the Breakaway Civilization
and there are MANY agents out there looking for classified leaks to protect the secrets.




A History of Government Management of UFO Perceptions through Film and
Television



fortyninthparalleljournal.files.wordpress.com...



Maybe this is why they want to ignore all the previous evidence ?

Harassment of the NASA panelists? Say it isn’t so……

Dialogue of the NASA panel host at the podium…..

It's disheartening to note that several of them have been subjected to online abuse due to their decision to participate on this panel.

A NASA security team is actively addressing this issue.

We at NASA are acutely aware of the considerable public interest in UAP. However, it's critical to understand any form of harassment towards our panelists only serves to detract from the scientific process which requires an environment of respect and openness. Now, every member of our team is a recognized authority in their respective field and they have our unequivocal support. NASA stands in solidarity with them, advocating for a respectful discourse that permits their expertise and the significance of their work. Thanks.

Another NASA administrator at the podium….

Before I begin though, I really do want to double down on Dan's words that it is really disheartening to hear of the harassment that our panelists have faced online all because they're studying this topic. NASA stands behind our panelists and we do not tolerate abuse. Harassment only leads to further stigmatisation of the UAP field significantly hindering the scientific progress and discouraging others to study this important subject matter. Your harassment also obstructs the public's right to knowledge. Our panelists are leading experts in the scientific, aeronautics and data analytics communities. We are very lucky to have them on board to share their invaluable insights to inform NASA on what possible data could be collected in the future and how it can be collected to help us better understand the nature of UAP.

Could this harassment be from the UFOs and Aliens Don’t Exist crowd? Or the You Better Not Disclose UFOs and Aliens in Earths Orbit crowd?

Is there a Ring Leader to the opposing crowd(s)?

I can only suspect 2 people behind this concerted effort to prevent possible and eventual full disclosure……and 1 of them is long dead.

Ehhhhh, anyway……that CRACK team of NASA Security is coming after you!

👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
Harassment of the NASA panelists? Say it isn’t so……

Dialogue of the NASA panel host at the podium…..

It's a heartening to note that several of them have been subjected to online abuse due to their decision to participate on this panel.

A NASA security team is actively addressing this issue.

We at NASA are acutely aware of the considerable public interest in UAP. However, it's critical to understand any form of harassment towards our panelists only serves to detract from the scientific process which requires an environment of respect and openness. Now, every member of our team is a recognized authority in their respective field and they have our unequivocal support. NASA stands in solidarity with them, advocating for a respectful discourse that permits their expertise and the significance of their work. Thanks.

Another NASA administrator at the podium….

Before I begin though, I really do want to double down on Dan's words that it is really disheartening to hear of the harassment that our panelists have faced online all because they're studying this topic. NASA stands behind our panelists and we do not tolerate abuse. Harassment only leads to further stigmatisation of the UAP field significantly hindering the scientific progress and discouraging others to study this important subject matter. Your harassment also obstructs the public's right to knowledge. Our panelists are leading experts in the scientific, aeronautics and data analytics communities. We are very lucky to have them on board to share their invaluable insights to inform NASA on what possible data could be collected in the future and how it can be collected to help us better understand the nature of UAP.

Could this harassment be from the UFO and Aliens Don’t Exist crowd? Or the You Better Not Disclose UFO and Aliens in Earths Orbit crowd?

Is there a Ring Leader to the opposing crowd(s)?

I can only suspect 2 people behind this concerted effort to prevent possible and eventual full disclosure……and 1 of them is long dead.

Ehhhhh, anyway……that CRACK team of NASA Security is coming after you!

👽

It is very odd that people out there would not want to know the results of what they may or may not find.

I am leaning more so to the religious extremists who are at odds with what they interpret as God's intent/plan that only humans were created as the dominant species in the universe. As if they know what God's plan is or was ever meant to be.

a reply to: quintessentone

I suspect they, the religious extremists, or zealots, could be part of the NASA Harassment crowd.

By now, the general religious world are coming around and smelling the UFO/Aliens coffee, with stories such as…..

For Pope Francis, It’s About More than Martians

And…..

Vatican scientist says belief in God and aliens is OK

Etc…

👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: quintessentone

I suspect they, the religious extremists, or zealots, could be part of the NASA Harassment crowd.

By now, the general religious world are coming around and smelling the UFO/Aliens coffee, with stories such as…..

For Pope Francis, It’s About More than Martians

And…..

Vatican scientist says belief in God and aliens is OK

Etc…

👽

From your link:

It is a poignant message about not withholding baptism, especially given the Pope’s previous comments that churches should not refuse baptism to children of unmarried parents. Francis is even thought to have called an unwed mother himself and told her that he would baptize her child himself if she could not find a priest to do it.

What does that tell us about priests? Priests follow their own interpretations of the Bible and the flock follows without question.

originally posted by: TXRabbit


Thanks for sharing that Karl. RD is one of the few researchers and personalities I admire.

The folks in today's "briefing" came across as victims of a bloated agency who got stuck on this group simply to make it appear as if they're interested. I'm sure there's some chuckleheads in the background, having a laugh

He has his moments mate and whatever his beliefs about UFO origin do think this book is an excellent one.

Really do wonder who put that 'nasa' team together (feels more like psyops) and no bloody wonder they are hyper sensitive about criticism.

originally posted by: ITSALIVE

originally posted by: combatmaster
a reply to: noonebutme

The truth is too much to handle for most people!

Said by someone who doesn’t know it. How can you know that an unknown cannot be handled by those you don’t even know?

The behavior of those in the know or able to handle is self evident to the point of being persecuted since time immemorial.

That is how i can know.

As for your assumption that I do not know.... well, that is your choice to believe in a baseless assumption... I prefer to follow empirical data.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

The agency that has been covering up UFOs ever since the first satellite was spotted is in charge of UFO disclosure.

SMH

a reply to: Tortuga

I guess your comment invites my response of my UFO blog 144, where I share less than 5 minutes of UFO footage I filmed, of which I blogged some math proof explaining why this thing filmed is a UFO, and what I believe its message to me is.

ufo144.blogspot.com...

Here’s the official NASA UAP website…..

NASA SCIENCE - SHARE THE SCIENCE UAP For Researchers

👽

originally posted by: karl 12

Really do wonder who put that 'nasa' team together (feels more like psyops) and no bloody wonder they are hyper sensitive about criticism.

I wonder too. I posted this comment in another thread and stand behind my opinion

Here's the way I see it regarding the NASA panel....

[my opinion]

Let's imagine that you have have concrete proof that bigfoot exists, whether it be video, physical evidence or copies of documented data.

The public starts inquiring, repeatedly "does bigfoot exist???" and looks to YOU to provide an answer. Now, you really don't want them to know and in fact, you wish they'd simply go away but you NEED to respond in some way, shape or form. How do you do it?

option 1 - Bring in a circle of friends, social media influencers, fringe-journalists and tabloid reporters to disseminate the narrative that "Bigfoot MIGHT exist" based in limited evidence you provide.

option 2 - Surround yourself with some of the best accredited folks you can find. Scientists, biologists, PhDs and data engineers. You give them enough data to form INCONCLUSIVE results to present to the public.

Which option would be best suited to provide the general public? Which would be most believed?

I think we're seeing option 2 at play here.

[/my opinion]

a reply to: karl 12

Thx K12

Just bought the book for cheap on eBay. Should be a good read….and a must, for my meager UFO library

🍺

👽

And then there’s this…..

UFOs: Five revelations from Nasa's public meeting

👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
And then there’s this…..

UFOs: Five revelations from Nasa's public meeting

👽

So basically nothing!

I don't believe aliens are visiting Earth. I do believe in advanced and classified prototypes that won't be disclosed. I also consider private groups with advanced technology a possibility.

originally posted by: karl 12

Haven't seen Major Oberg for a while…..

EXACTLY!

Perhaps plotting his crew’s next wave of deterring the new NASA UAP Team (N.U.T.) (panelists)..…Bwahhhhhhhh ha ha

👽