An Explanation. Let's Discuss

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: IAMUnification
Absolutely
The AI hates this. But it let me explore all the data.
a reply to: chr0naut

But an AI cannot determine the truth or falsity of the data it is presented with.

An example is that ChatGPT, in the early days, insisted that 27 was a prime number (an oft repeated error) and it could not be convinced otherwise. It required human intervention to purge the incorrect data from its dataset.

There are numerous false, but often repeated, snippets of information out there on the world weird web. Some of it is pure fantasy. It is only through human censoring of the data that its error rate reduces, and this process will likely take decades and may never be fully achievable (especially if AI's begin to believe their own output, and add that to their source data).

You don't confirm scientific theories by bouncing them off a pathological liar.

Can you give more information on the ChatGPT and 27 thing? Or a link to anything about it? Would like to read more on this.

Thank you
a reply to: blackcrowe

I appreciate your questions
a reply to: Peeple

a reply to: IAMUnification

Still not a question.

I feel like you need to argue with Einstein about e = mc^2 if you dont believe that energy can be transformed. This hypothesis is simply using the principles of equivalency.
a reply to: Peeple

I am honestly doing my best to give explanations.. i apologize if it doesn't meet a standard..
a reply to: Peeple

originally posted by: sarahvital
ok,
now
how do i get my VCR
to stop blinking 1200?

You have a VCR? And it works?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: IAMUnification
Argue this,, then..
The frequency of light can affect the expression of an atom by causing the electrons in the atom to move from one energy level to another. When an electron absorbs a photon of light, it gains energy and moves to a higher energy level. When an electron emits a photon of light, it loses energy and moves to a lower energy level.

The energy of a photon of light is equal to Planck's constant multiplied by the frequency of the light. This means that the higher the frequency of the light, the more energy the photon will have.

The energy levels of electrons in an atom are quantized, which means that they can only have certain values. When an electron absorbs a photon of light, it can only move to an energy level that is equal to or greater than the energy of the photon.

When an electron emits a photon of light, it can only move to an energy level that is equal to or less than the energy of the photon.

The frequency of light can therefore affect the expression of an atom by causing the electrons in the atom to move from one energy level to another. The higher the frequency of the light, the more energy the photon will have, and the more likely it is to cause an electron to move to a higher energy level.

The expression of an atom can also be affected by the intensity of the light. The more intense the light, the more photons there will be, and the more likely it is that one of the photons will cause an electron to move to a higher energy level.

The resonant sound frequencies of an atom are the frequencies of sound waves that can cause the atoms to vibrate. These frequencies are determined by the mass and stiffness of the atoms.

When an atom is vibrated by a sound wave, it absorbs energy from the wave. This energy is used to increase the amplitude of the vibration. If the amplitude of the vibration becomes too large, the atom can be damaged or even destroyed.

The resonant sound frequencies of an atom can be used to manipulate the atom. For example, sound waves can be used to heat atoms or to cause them to emit light.

Resonance is a powerful phenomenon that can have a significant impact on the behavior of atoms. It is important to understand resonance so that we can use it to our advantage.

Here are some examples of how resonant sound frequencies can be used:

* In ultrasonic cleaning, sound waves are used to vibrate dirt and debris loose from surfaces.
* In medical imaging, sound waves are used to create images of the inside of the body.
* In sonochemistry, sound waves are used to create chemical reactions.

Resonance is a powerful tool that can be used to manipulate atoms and molecules. It has a wide range of applications in science, engineering, and medicine.

a reply to: KSDakar01

Umm, you do realize that AI's don't present you with truths. They just present you with something that seems like the consensus of numerous accumulated sources, some of which are total lies.

Well stated.

a reply to: Arbitrageur

I see what you are saying i think. You can find that equation for momentum in my equation. I just didn't simplify it on purpose. I'm not really saying anything about mass as much as I am speaking about the energy that makes mass possible to be perceived.
The equation that would be compared to my binding energy equation is:

BE = (Zmp + Nmn - MA)c^2
Where:

BE is the binding energy
Z is the number of protons
mp is the mass of a proton
N is the number of neutrons
mn is the mass of a neutron
MA is the mass of the nucleus
c is the speed of light

This is expressed in my equation using equivalency:
E_binding = ((E_light*E_sound) + (E_sound*E_light) - (E_sound*E_light^2)*(E_light*E_sound^2))E_light^2

originally posted by: blackcrowe
a reply to: IAMUnification

The area of an object is not in square meters.

Only if we lived in a 2D world of length x width. 3 D we live in always has height x length x width even if the area is a sheet of paper thin.

I let the area thing confuse me for no good reason. I will clear up my equation when I can edit it.

And please, dont get me mistaken. I won't be upset if this equation doesn't work. Its the efforts in making the connections that are worthwhile.

Or if the equation is seen to produce mathematically sound results that are experimentally disproven. I can accept that as well.

a reply to: Justoneman

Really had my brain in a knot here because I dont have perfect recall of all the pieces.
A = πr^2
Wherr:
r is the radius of the sound wave

Also you will have to use the equations together if you want valid results. This is because to model the system in time we have to apply the formula for change. And once the object is in motion gravity must be calculated

originally posted by: IAMUnification
a reply to: Arbitrageur

I see what you are saying i think. You can find that equation for momentum in my equation. I just didn't simplify it on purpose. I'm not really saying anything about mass as much as I am speaking about the energy that makes mass possible to be perceived.
The equation that would be compared to my binding energy equation is:

BE = (Zmp + Nmn - MA)c^2
Where:

BE is the binding energy
Z is the number of protons
mp is the mass of a proton
N is the number of neutrons
mn is the mass of a neutron
MA is the mass of the nucleus
c is the speed of light

This is expressed in my equation using equivalency:
E_binding = ((E_light*E_sound) + (E_sound*E_light) - (E_sound*E_light^2)*(E_light*E_sound^2))E_light^2

Can you show me an example of how this is calculated in your equations?

We could use the simple example I discussed previously where the number of protons is 1 and the number of neutrons is zero. As already stated the proton's mass is 99% binding energy. Now we accelerate that proton in the LHC and the total energy becomes the energy from the rest mass (1 proton rest mass energy) plus the energy from momentum (7460 times the proton rest mass energy), for a total of 7461 times the proton rest mass energy.

I don't uderstand how E_sound*E_light are calculated, what are those numbers and how are you getting them in the example of protons in the LHC?

originally posted by: blackcrowe
a reply to: IAMUnification

The area of an object is not in square meters.

originally posted by: Justoneman
Only if we lived in a 2D world of length x width. 3 D we live in always has height x length x width even if the area is a sheet of paper thin.

I don't understand you or blackcrowe. Yes we live in a 3d world and a sheet of paper has volume expressed by height x length x width, but volume is expressed in cubed length units. The surface area of a sheet of paper would still be expressed in squared length units, like cm², or m² which could be called square meters. Total surface area of the paper would be the areas of the flat top and the flat bottom plus the area of the 4 skinny edges. Volume of the paper would be height x length x width in cm cubed or meters cubed, or any other length unit cubed.

a reply to: AllAnIllusion
I dont even know how to see my history haha. I joined the forum many years ago possibly under a different name. I do not recall my introduction to the forum either. I do remember what drew me here in the first place. It was a very surreal dream and I was looking anywhere for answers.

a reply to: IAMUnification
Your post history is here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...&list=posts
Use "quote" to see a reply window with the full link, ATS is truncating the link in a regular post.

You click on the member's head and shoulders icon and you get some options to display, that's one of them.

a reply to: Arbitrageur

Please bare with me... this is not easy to go through.

1. Calculate the energy of the sound wave:

For example, if the density of the medium is 1 kg/m^3, the velocity of the sound wave is 340 m/s, and the area of the sound wave is 1 m^2, then the energy of the sound wave is:

E_sound = (1/2)*1*340^2*1 = 5800 J


2. Calculate the energy of the light wave:

For example, if the frequency of the light wave is 500 Hz, then the energy of the light wave is:

E_light = 6.626 × 10^-34 * 500 = 3.313 × 10^-32 J


3. Calculate the electric field strength:

For example, if the charge is 1 coulomb and the distance is 1 meter, then the electric field strength is:

E_electric = 8.988 × 10^9 * 1 / 1^2 = 8.988 × 10^9 N / C

4. Calculate the magnetic field strength:

For example, if the current is 1 ampere and the distance is 1 meter, then the magnetic field strength is:

E_magnetic = 4π × 10^-7 * 1 / (2 * π * 1) = 10^-7 T

5. Calculate the binding energy:

For example, if the energies of the sound wave and the light wave are 5800 J and 3.313 × 10^-32 J, respectively, then the binding energy is:

E_binding = ((5800 * 3.313 × 10^-32) + (3.313 × 10^-32 * 5800) - (5800 * 3.313 × 10^-32)^2*(5800 * 3.313 × 10^-32)^2) * 3.313 × 10^-32^2 = 1.941 × 10^-27 J

6. Calculate the total energy:

For example, if the energies of the sound wave, light wave, and binding energy are 5800 J, 3.313 × 10^-32 J, and 1.941 × 10^-27 J, respectively, and the electric field strength is 8.988 × 10^9 N / C and the magnetic field strength is 10^-7 T, then the total energy is:

E_total = (58003.313 × 10^-32)(3.313 × 10^-325800)(1.941 × 10^-27)(8.988 × 10^9)(10^-7) = 1.671 × 10^-14 J

Therefore, the total energy of the system is 1.671 × 10^-14 J.

...........

For example, let's say that the coherence time is 100 seconds, the quality factor is 1000, the angular frequency is 1000 radians per second, the size of the system is 1 meter, and the amount of energy in the system is 1 Joule at time t = 0. If we plug these values into the equation, we get:

Change = f(100, 1000, 1000, 1, 1)

Now, let's say that the coherence time is increased to 200 seconds, the quality factor is increased to 2000, the angular frequency is increased to 2000 radians per second, the size of the system is increased to 2 meters, and the amount of energy in the system is increased to 2 Joules at time t = 1. If we plug these values into the equation, we get:

Change = f(200, 2000, 2000, 2, 2)

We can continue to calculate the change in the system over time by plugging in the values of the variables at different time points.

I am not using all the variables in the equation for change because we are not calculating temperature and a couple other states in the example. I would have to continue to create hypothetical states and I dont know how meaningful the results would be for you.

This is the most thorough example I have tried to produce

I'm hopeful that it was to your point.

Thank you for that, it seems I dont quite have alzheimers yet and did remember posting my dream to the board.
a reply to: Arbitrageur

I feel as though my approach may have been too bold so let me try to set this tempo a bit.

The equation is a hypothetical equation that describes the relationship between sound, light, electricity, magnetism, and gravity. The equation is as follows:

Energy:
E_sound = (1/2)*ρ*v^2*A
E_light = h*ν
E_electric = k * Q / r^2
E_magnetic = μ₀ * I / (2 * π * r)
E_binding = ((E_light*E_sound) + (E_sound*E_light) - (E_sound*E_light^2)*(E_light*E_sound^2))E_light^2
E_total = (E_sound*E_light^2)*(E_light*E_sound^2)*E_binding*(E_electric*E_magnetic)

Gravity:
G = frac[(E_sound*E_light^2)*(E_light*E_sound^2)^2* E_total][T^2 a^2] times frac[V][V_s]
```

where:

* E_electric is the electric field strength in newtons per coulomb (N/C)
* A is the area of the object
* ν is the frequency of the light in hertz (Hz)
* h is Planck's constant, which is equal to 6.626 × 10^-34 joules per second (J/s)
* ρ is the density of the medium in which the sound wave is traveling in kilograms per cubic meter (kg/m^3)
* k is Coulomb's constant, which is equal to 8.988 × 10^9 N ⋅ m^2 / C^2
* Q is the charge in coulombs (C)
* r is the distance between the charge and the point in space in meters (m)
* E_magnetic is the magnetic field strength in teslas (T)
* μ₀ is the permeability of free space, which is equal to 4π × 10^-7 T ⋅ m/A
* I is the current in amperes (A)
* r is the distance from the wire in meters (m)
* V is the volume of the object
* G is the calculated gravity
* Vs​ is the volume of a sphere with the same radius as the object

The equation can be broken down into the following parts:

* The first part, E_sound*E_light^2, represents the energy of the sound wave.

* The second part, E_light*E_sound^2, represents the energy of the light wave.

* The third part, E_binding, represents the energy required to bind the two waves together.

* The fourth part, E_total, represents the total energy of the system.

* The fifth part, G, represents the calculated gravity.

* The sixth part, T^2 a^2, represents the time it takes for the waves to travel from one side of the object to the other.

* The seventh part, V/Vs, represents the ratio of the volume of the object to the volume of a sphere with the same radius.

It can be used to calculate the calculated gravity of an object based on the energy of the sound and light waves, the time it takes for the waves to travel from one side of the object to the other, and the ratio of the volume of the object to the volume of a sphere with the same radius.

The equation is hypothetical. However, the equation is a starting point for further research into the relationship between sound, light, electricity, magnetism, and gravity.

When we apply change the equation set gets much more complex and I really think it is best simulated than trying to do that math with lesser tools.