BREAKING: Nashville’s Covenant School Files Motion To Stop Release Of Shooter’s Manifesto

NASHVILLE – A court filing made by The Covenant School’s legal team on Monday seeks to intervene in ongoing lawsuits that demand the public release of shooter Audrey Hale‘s writings.
The National Police Association (NPA) and Tennessee Firearms Association (TFA) have separately filed suits against the city with the same objective.

What exactly is in this mentaly broken individuals manifesto that the police and the school want hushed up?

What could possibly be so detrimental?

Abuse?
Names?
High profile manipulation?
Contacts?


This entire story is quite the CT playground.

Link

The school argues that the release of the information “could pose security and safety risks for the school, its staff, and students.”

The motion further asserts that the requested records in the lawsuits may contain sensitive information owned by the school, such as facility schematics and confidential data of employees and students.

“The outcome of this case could hinder our ability to protect our interests and the privacy of our employees and students,” states the motion.

...why dont I buy any of this? Precedent perhaps?

a reply to: JinMI

didn't the almighty fbi and the nashville police say that they weren't going to release the wackdo's manifesto.
has something changed?

a reply to: JinMI

Simple, have the Judge rule to remove any school schematics and security information and ONLY that.

Oh, yeah, that will never happen.

a reply to: JinMI

Whatever doesn't fit the narrative is a security risk.

a reply to: JinMI

If this excuse is to be taken seriously, they could just redact the information that is in question.

But, I don't think this is to be taken seriously, as, it appears to be some malarkey going on. Maybe some malarkey about working for the FBI?

Wouldn't surprise me...

originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: JinMI

didn't the almighty fbi and the nashville police say that they weren't going to release the wackdo's manifesto.
has something changed?

Yes, then no, then maybe, then no.

IIRC

originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: JinMI

If this excuse is to be taken seriously, they could just redact the information that is in question.

But, I don't think this is to be taken seriously, as, it appears to be some malarkey going on. Maybe some malarkey about working for the FBI?

Wouldn't surprise me...

If only we had a "no malarkey" themed administration!

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: JinMI

If this excuse is to be taken seriously, they could just redact the information that is in question.

But, I don't think this is to be taken seriously, as, it appears to be some malarkey going on. Maybe some malarkey about working for the FBI?

Wouldn't surprise me...

If only we had a "no malarkey" themed administration!

Who else is tired of drowning in malarkey

originally posted by: lordcomac

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: JinMI

If this excuse is to be taken seriously, they could just redact the information that is in question.

But, I don't think this is to be taken seriously, as, it appears to be some malarkey going on. Maybe some malarkey about working for the FBI?

Wouldn't surprise me...

If only we had a "no malarkey" themed administration!

Who else is tired of drowning in malarkey

75% of the US population....arguably

a reply to: JinMI

I wonder if any arrest have been made with anyone that has previously worked at the school?
If names and not cool activities are in it then one would think people would have atleast been taken into custody.

a reply to: JinMI

Too much info in there implicating her "handlers"?

She was...ahem... obviously "trained".

a reply to: JinMI
Hmm
That is interesting

I'm thinking it might have something to do with long standing abuse of children that's been swept under the rug and FBI 'grooming' of the shooter.

The school wasn't even the original target of choice, so who knows what's lurking behind those walls-and the original target?

If this 'person' (is that politically correct enough ?) had been right-wing we'd have had the whole story with all the details within hours. Whatever they're covering up must be massively damaging for any chance of a 2024 'win' to be believable.

a reply to: JinMI

I ain't buying their excuses either.

So blackmail? Threats? Bribes? All of the above?

If it were a public school, I would suspect that higher-ups threatened to withhold funds or something similar. But this is a private school, so I would expect outside interference.

And, since my default is to always blame the Feds if they are involved, I'm thinking it's the FBI making them offers they cannot refuse.

a reply to: Boadicea

Abuse or grooming seem to be the prevailing thought so far


To this I ask, why then the kids? They didnt have to die over this.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Boadicea

Abuse or grooming seem to be the prevailing thought so far


To this I ask, why then the kids? They didnt have to die over this.

Maybe in that twisted mind, the thought was they would be better off.

originally posted by: Klassified

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Boadicea

Abuse or grooming seem to be the prevailing thought so far


To this I ask, why then the kids? They didnt have to die over this.

Maybe in that twisted mind, the thought was they would be better off.

Yes, rationalization may be off the table.

However logic may not be.

a reply to: JinMI

Think about this maybe…..

What has been the big narrative from Biden and his goons, the woke FBI, the woke military, the woke school districts for quite some time?

“It’s good to be Trans, it’s good to change your gender, we all want you to change your gender”

Her manifesto probably derails the entire Trans ideology, it drove her to kill.
They don’t want that kind of thing to get out.

a reply to: RazorV66

Wouldnt a Christian school want that out though?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Boadicea

Abuse or grooming seem to be the prevailing thought so far

It definitely seems to be the preferred narrative. And I'm not buying that either. I looked into it, and the worst I could find was one known abuser, and a couple failed lawsuits against the church for allowing the abuser to remain a member.

Perhaps more has been exposed that I'm not aware of, but if all they have is the one known abuser, then they've got nothing.

To this I ask, why then the kids? They didnt have to die over this.

Exactly... the kids wouldn't be her target!!!

And there would not have been other -- preferred -- targets, only ruled out because of too much security. She (reportedly) put quite a bit of research and effort into her plan. This was premeditated.

If avenging her abuse were her motive, then she would not have considered (much less preferred) any other target, and she would not be targeting kids. She would have figured out how to target the administrators and teachers -- the ones who would have presumably failed her... and/or victimized her.