Durham Report Incoming

a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Where in the report was Trump exonerated? It did nothing to refute the Mueller investigation and even states that the Trump campaign had a "series of troubling contacts" with Russian assets.

a reply to: RickyD

It's a 300+ page report. That takes a bit of time to read.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Where in the report was Trump exonerated? It did nothing to refute the Mueller investigation and even states that the Trump campaign had a "series of troubling contacts" with Russian assets.

An opinion, which even if true is not criminal in any way shape or form. You’re not even being serious here.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

and the fantasy version you have in your head isn't even close to reality. You should read it. I did.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Where in the report was Trump exonerated? It did nothing to refute the Mueller investigation and even states that the Trump campaign had a "series of troubling contacts" with Russian assets.

You probably should start portraying a different profession.

The American legal system requires that the accusers / prosecutors prove someone guilty.

Absent that, their target is exonerated, not guilty, innocent.

That’s only the number one, most bedrock principle of our legal system.

As you continue to fixate on Trump proving himself not guilty, you are shown to be a pretender.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Where in the report was Trump exonerated? It did nothing to refute the Mueller investigation and even states that the Trump campaign had a "series of troubling contacts" with Russian assets.

You people
Is trump his campaign?
No
Yet they continued investigating the former president.

But you guys approved that guilt by association bull crap right?

By that same logic they should be tapping potato joes phone because of his nasty son, right?

originally posted by: stevieray

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Where in the report was Trump exonerated? It did nothing to refute the Mueller investigation and even states that the Trump campaign had a "series of troubling contacts" with Russian assets.

You probably should start portraying a different profession.

The American legal system requires that the accusers / prosecutors prove someone guilty.

Absent that, their target is exonerated, not guilty, innocent.

That’s only the number one, most bedrock principle of our legal system.

As you continue to fixate on Trump proving himself not guilty, you are shown to be a pretender.

Perhaps she is just a little confused about the law.

a reply to: stevieray
The Durham report presents evidence of specific crimes by specific people.

The idea that the American system currently does not prosecute democrats, or their various voting / donating constituents, is a whole other discussion.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: RickyD

It's a 300+ page report. That takes a bit of time to read.

Yes , but it does Point Out Who the Culprits Are.................

a reply to: network dude

One thing I've always wondered. What happened to 'lock her up'? That was a major campaign promise that was never mentioned again.

Why didn't he ask for a special counsel right away from HIS Doj? He would have taken the center of the board and could have held it.

It would have changed the course of history.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: network dude

One thing I've always wondered. What happened to 'lock her up'? That was a major campaign promise that was never mentioned again.

Why didn't he ask for a special counsel right away from HIS Doj? It would have changed the course of history.

Little known fact: Hillary was granted immunity during the FBI investigations. That's why they never put her under oath during that final questioning meeting. 😁

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: network dude

One thing I've always wondered. What happened to 'lock her up'? That was a major campaign promise that was never mentioned again.

Why didn't he ask for a special counsel right away from HIS Doj? He would have taken the center of the board and could have held it.

It would have changed the course of history.

this is just a guess, but I'd say he had some "trusted advisors" that told him to leave that alone as it would just look vindictive and petty. (But knowing Trump, he's all about vindictive and petty, so I likely haven't a clue)

a reply to: Xcalibur254

" Trump Slams 'Impotent' Barr After Durham Report "

" Former President Donald Trump lashed out at former Attorney General Bill Barr on Wednesday on Truth Social after the release of the Durham Report earlier in the week.

"I only wish that Bill Barr, as the Attorney General of the United States, was able to act," Trump wrote. "Sadly, he was afraid of the Radical Left Democrat Lunatics, and their constant threats against him of impeachment, and was absolutely impotent on the subject of the Durham Report. He should have taken strong action."

Trump added that "even more importantly, he did nothing on the massive voter fraud which took place during the 2020 presidential election. Remember, you get NOTHING from RINOS. An honor to have fired him!" "





www.newsmax.com...



Whatever Happened to the Barr Report ? That Rhino Coward Bowed Down to the Left out of Fear of Ridicule instead of Defending his Commander In Chief at the Time ..

a reply to: Xcalibur254

"No evidence" means nothing, diddly squat, zero, nada.

Then they opened the investigation anyways, and still found
no crime. Stick to the LIE, that is all they ever had.

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

I noticed with many of Trump hires, they seemed to be working with him at first, then his abrasive personality rubbed them wrong and you could see it when they started acting butthurt and then they dug their heels in.

He really has a problem hiring lawyers.

I did not know that!

They really were determined not to allow the peaceful transition of power. Indeed, America has been fundamentally changed. We wrote songs and school children sang them!

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: network dude

One thing I've always wondered. What happened to 'lock her up'? That was a major campaign promise that was never mentioned again.

Why didn't he ask for a special counsel right away from HIS Doj? It would have changed the course of history.

Little known fact: Hillary was granted immunity during the FBI investigations. That's why they never put her under oath during that final questioning meeting. 😁

a reply to: network dude

Trump has never given a fig about looking vindictive and petty. He's KNOWS his base would have been behind him 100% and don't care about vindictive and petty either!

A comment above reports that Hillary had been granted immunity by Obama DoJ. So that was that.

And Sessions was a HUGE mistake. Talk about Derp...

Trump picked them and managed them, so the failure lies with him.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

That's because it didn't happen.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

I noticed with many of Trump hires, they seemed to be working with him at first, then his abrasive personality rubbed them wrong and you could see it when they started acting butthurt and then they dug their heels in.

He really has a problem hiring lawyers.

No , you have it Completely Wrong . President Trump when Elected in 2016 was having a Hard Time getting People he Wanted for his Administration Confirmed , He eventually had to Settle from a " Short List " of Nominees Selected for him to Choose . He was Setup . Most of them were Deep State Plants who Eventually Showed their True Colors in Betraying his Confidence and Undermining his Presidency . Even Unbeknownst to him , his VP in Pence was Also on the Deep States Payroll . If he gets Nominated Again and Wins a Second Term , I Hope he is More Careful about the People he Might put his Trust in .

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: CoyoteAngels

That's because it didn't happen.

Here is a link I found that backs up Xuenchen's comment. I wouldn't jump to calling Trump a liar after what has been released this week.

abcnews.go.com...