It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I have been keeping up with the news about the proposals for 15 minute cities, and of course always considered them a horrible idea.
Revolution or suicide.
originally posted by: knoxie
Are you implying if you live in a 15 minute city you can’t go outside it?
From the Oxford city council site as of March 3, 2023:
"The traffic filters are not physical barriers of any kind and will not be physical road closures. They are simply traffic cameras that can read number plates.
If a vehicle passes through the filter at certain times of the day, the camera will read the number plate and (if you do not have an exemption or a residents’ permit) you will receive a fine in the post.
Oxford residents (and residents of some surrounding villages) will be able to apply for a permit to drive through the filters on up to 100 days a year. Residents living in the rest of Oxfordshire will be able to apply for a permit to drive through the filter on up to 25 days a year."
originally posted by: underpass61
originally posted by: knoxie
Are you implying if you live in a 15 minute city you can’t go outside it?
That's ultimately the plan-
From the Oxford city council site as of March 3, 2023:
"The traffic filters are not physical barriers of any kind and will not be physical road closures. They are simply traffic cameras that can read number plates.
If a vehicle passes through the filter at certain times of the day, the camera will read the number plate and (if you do not have an exemption or a residents’ permit) you will receive a fine in the post.
Oxford residents (and residents of some surrounding villages) will be able to apply for a permit to drive through the filters on up to 100 days a year. Residents living in the rest of Oxfordshire will be able to apply for a permit to drive through the filter on up to 25 days a year."
LINK
Apply for a permit or get fined - all the while being constantly surveilled.
But they will stop there and take it no further right?
Yeah right
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Moon68
Although tolls could be implemented for whatever reason. If you are going to use the roads often then said roads will need repairing more often, therefore those who use it most often should pay the larger portion for said repairs.
originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: Moon68
My goodness, you and LSU, what places. Please can you get a couple of containers (I'll pay) put them in the middle of nowhere, then when SHTF here in the UK I can run away to you.
originally posted by: Moon68
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Moon68
Although tolls could be implemented for whatever reason. If you are going to use the roads often then said roads will need repairing more often, therefore those who use it most often should pay the larger portion for said repairs.
Should government set up tolls for soccer moms walking on the sidewalks to help pay repairs? Everyone pays a portion for taxes collected for infrastructure repair. Commercial traffic will cause more damage to a roadway than Joe Snuffy going to visit his elderly mother a couple times a week.
This is nothing more than a control play from those that consider themselves the betters of the average citizen.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Moon68
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Moon68
Although tolls could be implemented for whatever reason. If you are going to use the roads often then said roads will need repairing more often, therefore those who use it most often should pay the larger portion for said repairs.
Should government set up tolls for soccer moms walking on the sidewalks to help pay repairs? Everyone pays a portion for taxes collected for infrastructure repair. Commercial traffic will cause more damage to a roadway than Joe Snuffy going to visit his elderly mother a couple times a week.
This is nothing more than a control play from those that consider themselves the betters of the average citizen.
I would propose walking surfaces not made of materials that would need constant maintenance. Our manmade materials have come a long way baby, so let's think long-term money savings and comfort for walking, biking and scootering.
originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: Moon68
My goodness, you and LSU, what places. Please can you get a couple of containers (I'll pay) put them in the middle of nowhere, then when SHTF here in the UK I can run away to you.
originally posted by: Moon68
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Moon68
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Moon68
Although tolls could be implemented for whatever reason. If you are going to use the roads often then said roads will need repairing more often, therefore those who use it most often should pay the larger portion for said repairs.
Should government set up tolls for soccer moms walking on the sidewalks to help pay repairs? Everyone pays a portion for taxes collected for infrastructure repair. Commercial traffic will cause more damage to a roadway than Joe Snuffy going to visit his elderly mother a couple times a week.
This is nothing more than a control play from those that consider themselves the betters of the average citizen.
I would propose walking surfaces not made of materials that would need constant maintenance. Our manmade materials have come a long way baby, so let's think long-term money savings and comfort for walking, biking and scootering.
Again, the point is missed. I find it fundamentally wrong for a government to determine a zone for people to live and fine those people if they try leaving that zone too much.
This isn't the f-ing Hunger Games..........yet.