First Graders Allegedly Force Girl to Perform Sex Act

originally posted by: ToneDeaf

posted by:Allaroundyou
Kids don't need Ipads in elementary school.

Better still . . .
security cameras with audio
in ALL classrooms!!!
and have security codes
for all parents to have access,
seeing for themselves what their
own children are being subjected to.
This must be a mandated as a human right.

For heaven's sake,
they do this at doggy daycare centers
but not for our children ???
If it wasn't for the ipad the incident
might have been
swept under the carpet.
As for the 'education' in schools,
it has overstepped sex/biology/precautions
they ARE indeed PUSHING indoctrinated
sexualization, pornography and grooming.



___________________

Good idea.
How about Body cams on every school official, including the janitors.

originally posted by: dandandat2


But I have to say thats a very powerful meme. Getting it to trend on social media should be a goal of those who feel strongly on these issues.

I agree.

a reply to: Quadrivium

What you are wanting is a police state. Every action will be recorded via camera's and facial recognition.

I cannot believe we've come this far as people wanting this.

originally posted by: litterbaux
a reply to: Quadrivium

What you are wanting is a police state. Every action will be recorded via camera's and facial recognition.

I cannot believe we've come this far as people wanting this.

I don't want children abused. There is absolutely no reason the school couldn't have body cams
It would cut down on BS like this and violence in schools.

a reply to: Quadrivium

After reading your comment, I'm even more on the fence of government supervision. On one hand it does make sense to have body cams on these deranged teachers allowing sexual acts in first grade. On the other hand I don't want the government media telling me that a .223 round is excessive while a .22 round is fine.

We are in a weird place right now in this country and I would definately agree that they are targetting the children for whatever reason. I hope it's not to exploit them in some sexual way but all of the evidence so far says, yeah.

Noah? The boat? Anytime now.....

THat's real sad. I can't speak much as im not a parent. But if i was, id restrict my kids from internet access (without full control of what they view) until they are teens.

Kids are curious and adventurous. I remember talking about sex when i was a young kid. We had some ideas but nothing to go off of. Kids often don't understand many concepts of right and wrong yet. They are just fresh minds abosrbing information.

I really think kids should have very limited access to the internet. Even youtube kid channels have very questionable and outright sexualized stuff on it.

Sex shouldn't be seen as bad, but man.. no kids should ever be introduced to porn and have an idea of what that is at least before being a teen.

Then again, im not a parent so i dont know what its like. I just can't imagine letting kids have free reign on the internet.

originally posted by: litterbaux
a reply to: Quadrivium

After reading your comment, I'm even more on the fence of government supervision. On one hand it does make sense to have body cams on these deranged teachers allowing sexual acts in first grade. On the other hand I don't want the government media telling me that a .223 round is excessive while a .22 round is fine.

We are in a weird place right now in this country and I would definately agree that they are targetting the children for whatever reason. I hope it's not to exploit them in some sexual way but all of the evidence so far says, yeah.

Noah? The boat? Anytime now.....

.223 vs .22 has nothing to do with it. Police have to wear body cameras for their safety and for the safety of the public.
Why shouldn't teachers?

a reply to: Quadrivium

I just used that example with caliber on how the media has brainwashed everyone.

As far as teachers and police officers using body camera's, I think you already know the answer to that. Police officers need that to clear them of crimes, first grade teachers would be indicted of crimes.

a reply to: Allaroundyou

But, their moms and dads, sisters and brothers do...layin all around the house.

I hesitate to suggest this but ask a child to go to the comptr/phone and show you a "dirty" picture. They can and will. My niece was 5. I was appalled. She wasnt bothered.

But boy, this is some crazy stuff for 1st graders...and that 6 year old who shot her teacher.

Serious problems require drastic actions to correct them, and I don't understand why it seems that so many people are unwilling to even discuss, much less implement them.
One doesn't need to be a genius to realize that many, many current problems, in particular problems with today's youth, are caused and fueled by information available to anyone with a computer. Porn websites, YouTube trash, social media, video games, etc, all DESIGNED TO CAUSE ADDICTION, to desensitze, and to exploit our children, and to exploit US THROUGH OUR CHILDREN! WHEN WILL WE STAND UP TO THESE NOUVEAU RICHE MUTHER#ERS AND REMOVE THEIR HANDS FROM OUR CHILDREN?
Its time for DRASTIC MEASURES! Children do not need cell phones, or social media, or any of it! Anyone who believes otherwise is either 1. getting rich from them, or 2. stupid. Mankind survived, and flourished, for many years before the internet got shoved down our throats. I DO NOT CARE how much money silicon valley and big-tech will lose, or how much influence they will lose!
In addition to big "tech", the entertainment biz is destroying us. Drastic actions need to include BANNING ALL WEAPONS from entertainment media... and while on the subject BAN ALL MURDER AND GLORIFICATION OF ILLICIT DRUGS too.
I saw some comments regarding FAULT is this tragedy in the elementary school. In my opinion the fault lies with all who allowed the matters discussed above to become part of everyday life (you and I)... and the fault of allowing it to continue lies with anyone who would oppose the suggested remedial, drastic actions discussed above.

posted by: litterbaux
What you are wanting is a police state

You've got that backwards.
Definition : A police state
describes a state whose government institutions
exercise an extreme level of control
over civil society.

Security cameras with audio would be for the
benefit of the families, parents, and students;
obviously not for the benefit of the administration.


____________________

a reply to: Quadrivium

Nice Avatar / Profile Pic.

I love it!

a reply to: infolurker
Dandandat2 gave me the idea.
I would like to see it more.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: litterbaux
a reply to: Quadrivium

After reading your comment, I'm even more on the fence of government supervision. On one hand it does make sense to have body cams on these deranged teachers allowing sexual acts in first grade. On the other hand I don't want the government media telling me that a .223 round is excessive while a .22 round is fine.

We are in a weird place right now in this country and I would definately agree that they are targetting the children for whatever reason. I hope it's not to exploit them in some sexual way but all of the evidence so far says, yeah.

Noah? The boat? Anytime now.....

.223 vs .22 has nothing to do with it. Police have to wear body cameras for their safety and for the safety of the public.
Why shouldn't teachers?

They will never go for it and their UNIION has a full stranglehold on education. Many got busted during the pandemic remote school over the internet when parents heard the crap they were pushing. Their entire plan was stealth and still is. They surely don't want people posting twitter videos of them full on recruiting kids.

a reply to: infolurker
Yeah, IMHO, it would be cheaper and better if we just did away with the Department of Indoctrination.
Children have learned less, consistently, since Carter inacted it, on a federal level, in 1978/79.
They are dumbing our youth down.

originally posted by: litterbaux
I remember those faces of death videos, where did we get them?

Most of Faces of Death was reenactment. Traces of Death, however, was all real footage. There was an "age limit" on them, but back then "18" meant that you could walk to the video store. Cigarettes were just as easy to buy as a minor.

originally posted by: nugget1
That explains a lot.

Does it? Elaborate.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: nugget1
That explains a lot.

Does it? Elaborate.

Think they mean, by your posting history, you seem disturbed.
It seems like you are stuck in a victimhood mentality and can't find your way out.
If your story is true, you were traumatized as a child.
You now lash out at those that resemble the people who, you think, should have protected you, as a child.


You asked and this is just my opinion.

originally posted by: Quadrivium
Think they mean, by your posting history, you seem disturbed.
It seems like you are stuck in a victimhood mentality and can't find your way out.
If your story is true, you were traumatized as a child.
You now lash out at those that resemble the people who, you think, should have protected you, as a child.


You asked and this is just my opinion.

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

Are you f#cking kidding me?

I seem "disturbed" to you because r/TheDonald got shut down, and all of those idiots flooded places like this, r/conspiracy, etc...

"Victimhood"? On THE site to come and express how straight, white males are victims now?

I am a straight, white male, and I have never felt like I'm the victim. I laugh at you for thinking that you are one.

I had an amazing childhood. Nobody ever abused me, nobody needed to protect me.

WTF are you f#cking talking about?

Wasn't it in Brave New World, all the children played sexual games and explored each other in some "education garden" (or whatever) while the creepy adults would hang out and watch, while conversating?

Something like that iirc.

I could never make it through that book because of those early scenes.