It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JinMI
Link
Covenant investigation update: Due to pending litigation filed this week, the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department has been advised by counsel to hold in abeyance the release of records related to the shooting at The Covenant School pending orders or direction of the court.
Apologies, can't add to existing thread on the topic.
A 180 degree position from last week, due to some litigation apparently.
If only it were a SCOTUS leak..........
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: ancientlight
a reply to: JinMI
My guess, 100% certain is due to the shooter being trans. Wouldn't fit the obvious agenda.
Or, the public promotion of said manifesto was just what the shooter wanted to achieve, and could possibly also contribute to the radicalization of others towards extremism (as has happened in the past)?
...right.
Lets decided to break precedent now.
The shooter was another dangerous kook, trying to justify a minority viewpoint. I don't think they need to be given a platform.
Anyone in most modern countries can already express their opinion in ways that are not deadly or dangerous.
That is the problem with those who suggest that 'free speech' is being opposed, just because someone wants to withhold offensive material.
There are other ways that allow freedom of expression, and perhaps, some particular things need to be censored as being inappropriate ways to achieve 'free speech'.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Bet there's names named.
Names that don't want to be named. š
Big Names š
Not Releasing The Manifesto Clown Score = 3Clownsš¤”š¤”š¤”
Key Tennessee Republicans are calling for Metro Nashville authorities to release documents written by The Covenant School shooter, saying it is critical to know the motive behind the murders before a special legislative session is held on gun laws.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: chiefsmom
I know ... sort of like Epstein's Client List and the Congressional Hush Money fund list ... two other things we were told we didn't need to ever see.
originally posted by: chr0naut
Thats the very definition of Censorship.
originally posted by: Dalamax
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: ancientlight
a reply to: JinMI
My guess, 100% certain is due to the shooter being trans. Wouldn't fit the obvious agenda.
Or, the public promotion of said manifesto was just what the shooter wanted to achieve, and could possibly also contribute to the radicalization of others towards extremism (as has happened in the past)?
...right.
Lets decided to break precedent now.
The shooter was another dangerous kook, trying to justify a minority viewpoint. I don't think they need to be given a platform.
Anyone in most modern countries can already express their opinion in ways that are not deadly or dangerous.
That is the problem with those who suggest that 'free speech' is being opposed, just because someone wants to withhold offensive material.
There are other ways that allow freedom of expression, and perhaps, some particular things need to be censored as being inappropriate ways to achieve 'free speech'.
Offensive material? Itās not like itās pornography in school libraries.
My take is that the tranny renigged on their tranny-ism and denounced the āmovementā as evil.
Probably exhorting kids who are being brainwashed into mutilation to reconsider.
Canāt have that kind of stuff being released into the Wild. It might be contagious.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Dalamax
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: ancientlight
a reply to: JinMI
My guess, 100% certain is due to the shooter being trans. Wouldn't fit the obvious agenda.
Or, the public promotion of said manifesto was just what the shooter wanted to achieve, and could possibly also contribute to the radicalization of others towards extremism (as has happened in the past)?
...right.
Lets decided to break precedent now.
The shooter was another dangerous kook, trying to justify a minority viewpoint. I don't think they need to be given a platform.
Anyone in most modern countries can already express their opinion in ways that are not deadly or dangerous.
That is the problem with those who suggest that 'free speech' is being opposed, just because someone wants to withhold offensive material.
There are other ways that allow freedom of expression, and perhaps, some particular things need to be censored as being inappropriate ways to achieve 'free speech'.
Offensive material? Itās not like itās pornography in school libraries.
My take is that the tranny renigged on their tranny-ism and denounced the āmovementā as evil.
Probably exhorting kids who are being brainwashed into mutilation to reconsider.
Canāt have that kind of stuff being released into the Wild. It might be contagious.
No, it is more likely a froot loop making up 'reasons' to justify killing innocent people who had no idea of who the froot loop even was, let alone their 'issues'.
originally posted by: Dalamax
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Dalamax
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: ancientlight
a reply to: JinMI
My guess, 100% certain is due to the shooter being trans. Wouldn't fit the obvious agenda.
Or, the public promotion of said manifesto was just what the shooter wanted to achieve, and could possibly also contribute to the radicalization of others towards extremism (as has happened in the past)?
...right.
Lets decided to break precedent now.
The shooter was another dangerous kook, trying to justify a minority viewpoint. I don't think they need to be given a platform.
Anyone in most modern countries can already express their opinion in ways that are not deadly or dangerous.
That is the problem with those who suggest that 'free speech' is being opposed, just because someone wants to withhold offensive material.
There are other ways that allow freedom of expression, and perhaps, some particular things need to be censored as being inappropriate ways to achieve 'free speech'.
Offensive material? Itās not like itās pornography in school libraries.
My take is that the tranny renigged on their tranny-ism and denounced the āmovementā as evil.
Probably exhorting kids who are being brainwashed into mutilation to reconsider.
Canāt have that kind of stuff being released into the Wild. It might be contagious.
No, it is more likely a froot loop making up 'reasons' to justify killing innocent people who had no idea of who the froot loop even was, let alone their 'issues'.
That doesnāt seem a very sound reason to keep it out of the public domain, does it?