What will cause the end of society as we know it...

a reply to: Munkh

Chicken Little, meet KFC. The solution for the problem of little chickens...

a reply to: nugget1

I cant argue that at all.

That being said, I don't see us uniting any time soon. We cant even agree what bathroom to use...

a reply to: M5xaz

I think those are one and the same. Not working in our best interests, thats or sure.

a reply to: burntheships

An interesting take with the AI aspect - certainly possible the way things are going.

Human or otherwise, some kind of overlord will emerge and the masses will either bend or break...

a reply to: Vroomfondel

When robots can fix themselves, AI will announce it's sentience.

Everything up to that point is preparing you to become digital.

a reply to: BeNotAfraid

Action or the absence of...either will get it done.

a reply to: Maxmars

I like that perspective. But I also like George Carlins viewpoint: "Planet Earth is fine. The people are phucked, but the planet is fine."

a reply to: watchitburn

Which communists? The real ones or the ones one side calls the other to marginalize their point of view? Actually, having said that, I think both would work...

a reply to: Deetermined

I see your point, but I don't think we were supposed to be so willing to get it all going. I always thought of it more as something to be avoided...but thats me...

The answer to the threat title is a simple one.
Democrats.

What will cause the end of society as we know it...

It will be accidental...eventually some weaponized bio/chem will breech containment and float around the globe on the breeze.

or

yellowstone could blow and bring on a never ending winter.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

Something VERY close to this. A couple items are out of place / names but you will get the idea.

endtimenews.net...

What will cause the end of society as we know it...?

The end of American society? I would ask which one, but...

What would anyone identify as The sign that American society has come to an end?

When that sign is brought down, it will be over.

What is it? Name it.

?

Logged back in real quick to say: Bacon is not a sign. It's a signifier, but whatever. Bacon doesn't count.

Carry on.

a reply to: 7UNCLE7SNAKE7HANDS7

Well, it was more a philosophical exercise rather than a delineated sequence of events. I listed the things I see as pretty big tears in the fabric of society. The idea that there is always some horrific end right around the corner, the manipulation of facts and information, the constant pitting groups against each other, the countless vacuous distractions, it all leads to something that feels nefarious at a visceral level.

Can I tell you the exact moment society, any society ends? No. But when we have the problems we are currently experiencing and the general population is more focused on things like kardashians and transtesticle story time for 5 year olds... we are a long way from our happy place.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

The end of society as we know it will come about when there is no bacon left.

Although it is true, the pinchgut isn’t submerged.

The tide at fort Denison in port Jackson is regularly 10-13 cm above what is predicted.

Sydney harbour is in Canada.

a reply to: Moon68

a reply to: Vroomfondel

I hear you.

For me it must be a sign.

The repeating penultimate sign, to me, has been for the for the last 15 years the sign that reads "$4.99 Cheeseburger Meal".

And also pixies. A sudden proliferation of pixies is definitely a sign.

a reply to: Vroomfondel

The so called corrupt to the core psychopatic 'elites' . They want to own the world and control us 100%.
This will not end well

originally posted by: Vroomfondel
For years now, decades actually, we have heard "the end" is near. But what is it? The end of what?

In the 60's we were told that we would run out of oil in the 70's.
We were told there would be wide spread famine in the 70's.
In the 70's we were told there was a new ice age about to happen.
We were told the ozone would disappear and all life on Earth would end.
We were told the killer bees were going to get us all.
We were told there would be food rationing by the 80's.
In the 80's we were told acid rain would kill flora and fauna in huge numbers.
We were told the oceans were going to rise and wipe out huge swaths of coastal land.
In the 90's we were told Y2K would be the end of us all, and the polar ice caps were going to be gone by 2010.
In the 2000's we were told it would be terrorism, famine, and plagues.
In the 2010's we were told it was global warming and the Mayan calendar.
Now its everything from cow farts to fossil fuels to murder hornets to endless covid variants.

We are nowhere near running out of oil.
Wide spread famine never materialized.
The new ice age disappeared as fast as it arrived.
The ozone is actually better now than it was then.
Food rationing never happened.
Acid rain never happened.
The oceans didn't rise.
Y2K was nothing but a minor inconvenience, but a lot of people made a lot of money...
Terrorism, famine, and plagues are manageable if we are allowed to manage them.
The calendar started over at the beginning - like calendars do.
Global warming is the new ice age - and not happening.
The rest is too stupid to even comment on.

One of the biggest things now is the rising oceans. This is a great device since only retrospect will serve as proof. The people warning us about rising oceans are all buying beach front property their private jets take them to whenever they need to unwind. The banks are still financing this construction, even though we are supposed to believe it will soon be under water and worthless.

In 1620 Plymouth rock was above sea level. In 1720 it was above sea level. In 1820 it was above sea level. In 1920 it was above sea level. In 2020 it was above sea level. Call me when it goes under. Until then stfu.

Why is biden trying to convert the entire US to electric cars by 2030? California cant meet its own energy needs now even though they already borrow power from three neighboring states. They still have rolling brown outs and black outs when the air conditioners turn on. And that is not the biggest problem with this plan. Even if we ran every power generation station at its max output, including all the fossil fuel and nuclear plants, we could not generate enough energy to meet the projected needs of that many ev's. And even if we could generate that much energy, our electrical grid could not handle transmitting that much power. Even if our grid could handle that much power, by far the greater majority of homes are not wired to deliver that much power. In order to make the plan a reality we would have to dramatically increase our power generation capability, retool the entire electrical grid from coast to coast, and rewire the majority of homes in this country - all in the next 6 1/2 years. Is there one single person on this planet who thinks democrats can accomplish these goals in that time frame? Bueller...? Bueller...?

So why are TPTB so intent on having us believe that there is always some overwhelming calamity just around the corner ready to wipe us out? Why is nothing of value being done to prevent these alleged certainties? Why does the media bang on about it day after day and offer no suggestions or solutions?

Why are TPTB so intent on pitting us against each other? It doesn't matter what groups we are talking about or what the core ideology is, as long as they are in direct opposition to each other they serve the purpose. It is obvious that someone is setting us against each other in every imaginable way. But the question is why? What is the payoff? Why invest that much time and effort? What is the end game for the people doing this?

Any two groups who oppose each other are part of the equation. It doesn't matter who they are or what they believe as long as they are in direct opposition. TPTB, the media, the players in this sick game, fan the flames of that opposition every chance they get. They try to get people so rabid and angry that they see the other side as less than human, not worthy of inclusion in society, too dumb to be of value, not worth saving. They have been dehumanized. Shackles and slurs dehumanize. Obscuring identities dehumanize. Restricting communities dehumanize.

White against non-white.
Secular against non-secular.
Rich against poor.
Young against old.
Conservative against progressive.
Skinny against fat.
Urban against rural.
Straight against gay.
Meat eaters against vegans.
Citizens against illegal aliens.
Republicans against democrats...

I believe less than 1% of the population of this country fails to land in one of those categories. Simply put, 99% of the population of the USA has been, in someone's eyes, dehumanized to varying degrees.

The conservative traditionalists (the basket of deplorables) vs. the liberal progressives (the bowl of granola - froots nuts and flakes).

So why is this agenda so damned important?

When the opposition has been sufficiently dehumanized, human rights are no longer an issue.

When we see one group dehumanize another we all feel it deep in our hearts, a piece of humanity lost. Even if it is two groups whom we have no interest in, it still affects us all. When one person loses their humanity our collective population has lost one person's worth of humanity. How many do we have to lose before it all falls apart?

What percentage of the population has to be devalued before the whole can no longer be saved? Imagine if 50% of the population were seen as not good enough, not worth saving, unredeemable. Society would be lost. What if it were 40%? Would that be enough? 30%? 20%? What if just 10% of the population was deemed unworthy? That would mean society has been decimated. You never hear the word "decimated" and think, "That is a good thing." That is because it isn't. The definition of decimated is literally one in ten - 10%. Attrition for the win.

Most people think that they are not capable of seeing someone as less than human, no matter how much they disagree on something. If you could snap your fingers and all opposition to your most critical beliefs would just disappear, would you do it? If getting them on your side was not an option, would you eliminate them for what you believe to be the greater good? Would you sacrifice a limb to save the body? For every person who said "yes" there is a person on the other side who also said "yes".

We just wished ourselves into oblivion - for the greater good...

(forgive me if this seems disjointed or incongruous. It was written 'stream of consciousness' style and left as is.)

Great questions. Divided & scared people are easy to control.