Man in England gets pregnant! The madness reloaded

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The most pertinent question to humanities sake

You sure have a unhealthy fascination with the topic... I wonder where all the fear is coming from?

What you should really ask is, can a biological female feel more comfortable in the masculine role, and is that any of my business if she adapts another role?

You being an expert in biology, i have to ask... Is it a rhetorical question?

The 'fear factor' is called trabsphobia according to the transgender ideology. But that's a strawman argument...

I am fascinated though about the stupidity of the human race. Or at least a large part of it.

I see you get offended whenever such topics for conversation are coming up. It's not surprising given that you believe in this ideology. Just a little while ago you made some claims that the thread is transphobic. Not surprising at all.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The most pertinent question to humanities sake

You sure have a unhealthy fascination with the topic... I wonder where all the fear is coming from?

What you should really ask is, can a biological female feel more comfortable in the masculine role, and is that any of my business if she adapts another role?

You being an expert in biology, i have to ask... Is it a rhetorical question?

You need to stop the trans apologetics and the denialism of reality.

Here you go again with the masculine role... A woman doesn't need to 'transition' if she wants to have a more 'masculine' role. Whatever this means in your ideology. There have always been masculine women and feminine men. But they are stil women and men.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Seemed like a reasonable post and question to me.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Nope.

There are 4 lights, NOT 5.

A woman got pregnant and some people have chosen to take part in their fantasy. It's that simple.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Seemed like a reasonable post and question to me.

You need to stop the trans apologetics and the denialism of reality please.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

I did either of those things, where?

You need to be more tolerant of other folks views.

As I have told you before, I'm not that invested in this issue.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I did either of those things, where?

You need to be more tolerant of other folks views.

As I have told you before, I'm not that invested in this issue.

I am impressed there are five stars in your reply as you have spoken about tolerance applying the principles of populism very well.

You don't have to be invested in this subject to appreciate the insanity that has infected society.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

I didn't mention or refer to "populism", either.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

No one said she has to transition, but she can if she likes.

what's your issue with it?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I didn't mention or refer to "populism", either.

Your whole argument above relies on populism. Bringing up tolerance in the discussion in the absence of any other valid arguments.

As before, you don't have to be invested in this subject to appreciate the insanity that has infected society.

Monty Python nailed this nonsense 44 years ago.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

It's interesting that your topics are very much garnered to the echo chamber of ATS, combine that with your S&F fixation, and your populism accusations start to sound alot like projection....

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Asmodeus3

No one said she has to transition, but she can if she likes.

what's your issue with it?

The issue of insanity that has infected society. The Guardian claims that a dad has given birth. Naaah! A woman has given birth. Men cannot give birth.

Are you asking me if I am an expert in biology?!
That's hilarious. Shouldn't you ask the self declared experts who claim there are 72 genders where did they obtain their degrees.

Do you believe there are 72 genders? If and if so, can you name them.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Asmodeus3

It's interesting that your topics are very much garnered to the echo chamber of ATS, combine that with your S&F fixation, and your populism accusations start to sound alot like projection....

The topic of the insane transgender ideology is discussed pretty much everywhere. So your argument is incorrect.

A woman doesn't need to 'transition' if she wants to have a more 'masculine' role. Whatever this means in your ideology. There have always been masculine women and feminine men. But they are stil women and men.

originally posted by: mtnshredder
Monty Python nailed this nonsense 44 years ago.

Prophetic!

Well ahead of their times!

a reply to: Asmodeus3

The problem is you're not laughing, or I don't get your humor

a reply to: Asmodeus3

I didn't actually raise any "argument".

I just suggested that you might be more tolerant of other folks opinions

Is all.

Try it some time.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Asmodeus3

No one said she has to transition, but she can if she likes.

what's your issue with it?

Still you haven't commented on the topic of the thread: A dad who has given birth.

Don't you not see anything wrong with it?!

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The problem is you're not laughing, or I don't get your humor

I have asked a few questions and you seem to want to disregard them as if they were never asked. Why is this?

a reply to: Asmodeus3

She was never a man.

To quote the article "...He considered a hysterectomy, but never went through with it – partly because he had not ruled out the possibility of having children."

So, as a proposed acid test - a man cannot EVER have, or have had, a hysterectomy.