Man in England gets pregnant! The madness reloaded

www.theguardian.com...

In a few words and for the purpose of saving people from confusion and all the ambiguity when it comes to transgender individuals, a transman is a biological male who has now 'transitioned'. In our days you don't need to go through surgery, 'hormonal therapy', and receive other types of medications. You just identity as a man or woman and that's about it in most cases.

In the most traditional version of transgender individuals, surgery, 'hormonal therapy', and the use of drugs, are integral parts of the 'transitioning' process. Freddy McConnell, is one such case, and he is a transman who gave birth to a healthy baby boy called Jack.

Generally speaking, I wish them well, and wish they are healthy and live a long and productive life. What I don't see however is that the words pregnancy and man don't go together. It's very misleading to say that a dad gave birth but you can't expect anything better from the left-wing Guardian which has been possessed by the woke culture and ideology. Freddy McConnell is still a woman and not a man, that's why she gave birth.

Men cannot give birth. Period. The transgender ideology must be the most absurd one that I have come across in all the years I have been on this planet...

From the article.

McConnell, 32, started taking testosterone at 25 and had “top surgery” to remove breast tissue a year later. He considered a hysterectomy, but never went through with it – partly because he had not ruled out the possibility of having children. In the film, we see how discombobulated McConnell becomes when he stops taking testosterone as he tries to conceive, using a sperm donor, and his body, in effect, goes into reverse. He starts having periods again (“I don’t like the idea that I’ve got tampons in my bag,” he winces); his facial hair gets wispier, his hips broaden, his tummy softens and he starts to speak less from his chest and more from his throat. “Every time I think about it, I think, ‘What the # am I doing?’” he says. At one point, a tearful McConnell sobs into the camera in the middle of the night: “I feel like a #ing alien.”

In the same month, the government published figures showing that, over the past 12 months, anti-trans hate crimes had risen by almost a third (from 1,248 in 2017, to 1,651 in 2018). McConnell believes much of the antipathy has been fuelled by unlikely bedfellows – the “alt-right” and some feminists, who argue that biology is destiny and therefore trans women are not really women and trans men are not really men.

As ridiculous as it sounds we need to ask the question for the sake of humanity:

Can men get pregnant?

originally posted by: Asmodeus3


As ridiculous as it sounds we need to ask the question for the sake of humanity:

Can men get pregnant?

no. It's not possible, Biology and science and junk.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Asmodeus3


As ridiculous as it sounds we need to ask the question for the sake of humanity:

Can men get pregnant?

no. It's not possible, Biology and science and junk.

The way the Guardian is presenting it: The dad who gave birth. It makes you think how ridiculous journalism has become in our days.

The concept is rather simple.

You have biological females who decide to 'transition' to men. Then they give birth as they are still women, and then you have the left wing press and the woke crowd to cheer that finally even men can get pregnant and give birth. Let's put an end to transphobia, bigotry, and discrimination.

Was it the Chernobyl nuclear accident back in 1986 that perhaps poisoned our air and water and gave rise to a whole generation of squirrely people who cannot decide what gender they are, whether or not they should ever work or should even have to, preferring instead to text or scream into their cell phones all day long as they stand in the middle of the road completely oblivious, trying desperately to decide what platform they can possibly be victimized on and file lawsuit after lawsuit and become instant millionaires.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

their not a man if they still have ovaries or a uterus, plain and simple. well maybe with out ovaries, but you differently have to have a womb / uterus.
cutting stuff off or sewing something on does not the other gender make.

It's all part of the left's ongoing war with reality. Remember, these are the same people who are always telling us how important it is to fight disinformation and misinformation.

originally posted by: ColeYounger
It's all part of the left's ongoing war with reality. Remember, these are the same people who are always telling us how important it is to fight disinformation and misinformation.

Yep! Because misinformation and disinformation exist only within the cycles of right wing conspiracy theorists.

a reply to: RonnieJersey

You should ask Moon68 about his theory on crazy sometime, it makes a lot of sense.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: RonnieJersey

You should ask Moon68 about his theory on crazy sometime, it makes a lot of sense.

Thank you, I will look out for him!!

originally posted by: RonnieJersey

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: RonnieJersey

You should ask Moon68 about his theory on crazy sometime, it makes a lot of sense.

Thank you, I will look out for him!!

Mornin' Ronnie. Here's a quick bit of my theory:

In the 80's, as part of negotiations for Reagan's financial reforms, Democrats demanded that all mental asylums be closed down. All but the most dangerous, criminally insane mental defectives were released to the public. We're talking a minimum of 10's of thousands, I've read estimates of upwards of 300k. I'm fairly certain that many of them procreated, some with other unstable individuals. The United States has literally been breeding insanity bringing societal shift to where we are now. Two, going on three generations in and we sit around wondering what's changed in the last 30 years. We've propagated crazy and society and the policies that govern it.

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: RonnieJersey

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: RonnieJersey

You should ask Moon68 about his theory on crazy sometime, it makes a lot of sense.

Thank you, I will look out for him!!

Mornin' Ronnie. Here's a quick bit of my theory:

In the 80's, as part of negotiations for Reagan's financial reforms, Democrats demanded that all mental asylums be closed down. All but the most dangerous, criminally insane mental defectives were released to the public. We're talking a minimum of 10's of thousands, I've read estimates of upwards of 300k. I'm fairly certain that many of them procreated, some with other unstable individuals. The United States has literally been breeding insanity bringing societal shift to where we are now. Two, going on three generations in and we sit around wondering what's changed in the last 30 years. We've propagated crazy and society and the policies that govern it.

Sounds like crazy right wing conspiracy theory...

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Um, dad is a very gender-biased term.

They are just a birthing person, no matter if they choose to identify as a mom or dad.

Silly diversity and inclusion propagandists, gender neutral terms means there is no "trans" man or woman and no dads who give birth. It's just a bunch of non-men and non-women doing gender neutral activities that are totally not at all related to bioligical reality.

How odd is it that people advocate to render meaningless these labels that they also claim are lifesaving affirmations that must be repeated at them like mantras everywhere they go.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: RonnieJersey

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: RonnieJersey

You should ask Moon68 about his theory on crazy sometime, it makes a lot of sense.

Thank you, I will look out for him!!

Mornin' Ronnie. Here's a quick bit of my theory:

In the 80's, as part of negotiations for Reagan's financial reforms, Democrats demanded that all mental asylums be closed down. All but the most dangerous, criminally insane mental defectives were released to the public. We're talking a minimum of 10's of thousands, I've read estimates of upwards of 300k. I'm fairly certain that many of them procreated, some with other unstable individuals. The United States has literally been breeding insanity bringing societal shift to where we are now. Two, going on three generations in and we sit around wondering what's changed in the last 30 years. We've propagated crazy and society and the policies that govern it.

Sounds like crazy right wing conspiracy theory...

More like anecdotal observation over the last 40 years

Incremental insanity until we've hit the tipping point where it's no longer just on the fringe but in your face everyday, you must not only accept but celebrate the madness.

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: RonnieJersey

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: RonnieJersey

You should ask Moon68 about his theory on crazy sometime, it makes a lot of sense.

Thank you, I will look out for him!!

Mornin' Ronnie. Here's a quick bit of my theory:

In the 80's, as part of negotiations for Reagan's financial reforms, Democrats demanded that all mental asylums be closed down. All but the most dangerous, criminally insane mental defectives were released to the public. We're talking a minimum of 10's of thousands, I've read estimates of upwards of 300k. I'm fairly certain that many of them procreated, some with other unstable individuals. The United States has literally been breeding insanity bringing societal shift to where we are now. Two, going on three generations in and we sit around wondering what's changed in the last 30 years. We've propagated crazy and society and the policies that govern it.

Sounds like crazy right wing conspiracy theory...

More like anecdotal observation over the last 40 years

Incremental insanity until we've hit the tipping point where it's no longer just on the fringe but in your face everyday, you must not only accept but celebrate the madness.

Inclusiveness and tolerance

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: RonnieJersey

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: RonnieJersey

You should ask Moon68 about his theory on crazy sometime, it makes a lot of sense.

Thank you, I will look out for him!!

Mornin' Ronnie. Here's a quick bit of my theory:

In the 80's, as part of negotiations for Reagan's financial reforms, Democrats demanded that all mental asylums be closed down. All but the most dangerous, criminally insane mental defectives were released to the public. We're talking a minimum of 10's of thousands, I've read estimates of upwards of 300k. I'm fairly certain that many of them procreated, some with other unstable individuals. The United States has literally been breeding insanity bringing societal shift to where we are now. Two, going on three generations in and we sit around wondering what's changed in the last 30 years. We've propagated crazy and society and the policies that govern it.

Sounds like crazy right wing conspiracy theory...

More like anecdotal observation over the last 40 years

Incremental insanity until we've hit the tipping point where it's no longer just on the fringe but in your face everyday, you must not only accept but celebrate the madness.

Inclusiveness and tolerance

Objective reality

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
The concept is rather simple.

You have biological females who decide to 'transition' to men. Then they give birth as they are still women, and then you have the left wing press and the woke crowd to cheer that finally even men can get pregnant and give birth. Let's put an end to transphobia, bigotry, and discrimination.

I Have a Better Idea.
Let's Put an End to Stupidity.
Grab a Biology Book and do some Reading.

a reply to: bluesman462002

a reply to: Asmodeus3

The most pertinent question to humanities sake

You sure have a unhealthy fascination with the topic... I wonder where all the fear is coming from?

What you should really ask is, can a biological female feel more comfortable in the masculine role, and is that any of my business if she adapts another role?

You being an expert in biology, i have to ask... Is it a rhetorical question?

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The most pertinent question to humanities sake

You sure have a unhealthy fascination with the topic... I wonder where all the fear is coming from?

What you should really ask is, can a biological female feel more comfortable in the masculine role, and is that any of my business if she adapts another role?

You being an expert in biology, i have to ask... Is it a rhetorical question?

The 'fear factor' is called trabsphobia according to the transgender ideology.

I am fascinated though about the stupidity of the human race. Or at least a large part.

I see you get offended whenever such topics for conversation are coming up. It's not surprising given that you believe in this ideology. Just a little while ago you made some claims that the thread is transphobic. Not surprising at all.