Husband of BBC presenter killed by the Covid vaccine is suing Astrazeneca

a reply to: ScepticScot

You seem not to read any research papers but only engaging in vaccine apologetics. It's a great irony to ask for links featuring research papers when you don't even read any of them. It's not surprising you don't know this paper the other member was talking about and for which at least one thread was made and it has been discussed extensively in most other threads.

a reply to: ScepticScot


Let's see the facts again as the facts speak for themselves:

Deaths due to the vaccine
Debilitating conditions due to the vaccine
Severe adverse reactions due to the vaccine
Withdrawal of the vaccine from most countries


Hardly a success story and hardly the miracle of science as it has been described by the press and the journalists who themselves played a crucial role in propagating misinformation and disinformation all along.

Are you still arguing the AZ vaccine has not been cancelled in the UK?

a reply to: alldaylong

Still waiting from you since yesterday the link that says the AZ vaccine is still used in the UK.

There isn't any I am afraid. The vaccine has been

CANCELLED!!!

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: ScepticScot

You seem not to read any research papers but only engaging in vaccine apologetics. It's a great irony to ask for links featuring research papers when you don't even read any of them. It's not surprising you don't know this paper the other member was talking about and for which at least one thread was made and it has been discussed extensively in most other threads.

Happy to read them when people follow common courtesy and provide sources. More unsupported claims about other members from you again.

There are thousands of studies and hundreds of threads on this site. Just saying it was mentioned previously doesn't cut it.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: ScepticScot


Let's see the facts again as the facts speak for themselves:

Deaths due to the vaccine
Debilitating conditions due to the vaccine
Severe adverse reactions due to the vaccine
Withdrawal of the vaccine from most countries


Hardly a success story and hardly the miracle of science as it has been described by the press and the journalists who themselves played a crucial role in propagating misinformation and disinformation all along.

Are you still arguing the AZ vaccine has not been cancelled in the UK?

Why do you keep copy pasting your own posts?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot

"Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults"

Wel done. However that is one of study that has been fairly comprehensively ripped apart for several reasons.

Not least because they gave the risk by counting numbers if SAEs , not numbed of people affected.

If you google the study name that comes up as well...

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: ScepticScot

You seem not to read any research papers but only engaging in vaccine apologetics. It's a great irony to ask for links featuring research papers when you don't even read any of them. It's not surprising you don't know this paper the other member was talking about and for which at least one thread was made and it has been discussed extensively in most other threads.

Happy to read them when people follow common courtesy and provide sources. More unsupported claims about other members from you again.

There are thousands of studies and hundreds of threads on this site. Just saying it was mentioned previously doesn't cut it.

You don't seem to read anything. This is a famous publication usually avoided by the vaccine apologists and the denialists of reality.

Ye ye ye... There are thousands of studies that...bla bla bla. We know the story. You still haven't read them either.

a reply to: ScepticScot

So you didn't read it......

You heard that it's been ripped apart.

Have you got a link to the fact check site?

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot

"Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults"

Wel done. However that is one of study that has been fairly comprehensively ripped apart for several reasons.

Not least because they gave the risk by counting numbers if SAEs , not numbed of people affected.

If you google the study name that comes up as well...

It's only ripped in your mind and understanding. Try not to copy paste whatever you see online when at the same time you haven't read any other papers and you have claimed there are thousands that support the narrative. Partially true though as they are getting funded by the pharmaceuticals and other nefarious interests.


Therefore they are CANCELLED!!!

Your arguments have been refuted.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot

So you didn't read it......

You heard that it's been ripped apart.

Have you got a link to the fact check site?

Desperate attempts when he hasn't even read them. But he has come to the conclusion it's being ripped apart. Credible...

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot

"Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults"

Wel done. However that is one of study that has been fairly comprehensively ripped apart for several reasons.

Not least because they gave the risk by counting numbers if SAEs , not numbed of people affected.

If you google the study name that comes up as well...

It's only ripped in your mind and understanding. Try not to copy paste whatever you see online when at the same time you haven't read any other papers and you have claimed there are thousands that support the narrative. Partially true though as they are getting funded by the pharmaceuticals and other nefarious interests.

Therefore they are CANCELLED!!!

Yes only the studies (tiny number) that you think agree with your position are valid.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

That's why I was reluctant to share any link because I know the poster has no interest in reading it.

So predictable.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot

"Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults"

Wel done. However that is one of study that has been fairly comprehensively ripped apart for several reasons.

Not least because they gave the risk by counting numbers if SAEs , not numbed of people affected.

If you google the study name that comes up as well...

It's only ripped in your mind and understanding. Try not to copy paste whatever you see online when at the same time you haven't read any other papers and you have claimed there are thousands that support the narrative. Partially true though as they are getting funded by the pharmaceuticals and other nefarious interests.

Therefore they are CANCELLED!!!

Yes only the studies (tiny number) that you think agree with your position are valid.

Your arguments have been refuted.

Let's see the facts again.

Deaths due to the vaccine
Debilitating conditions due to the vaccine
Severe adverse reactions due to the vaccine
Withdrawal of the vaccine from most countries


Hardly a success story and hardly the miracle of science as it has been described by the press and the journalists who themselves played a crucial role in propagating misinformation and disinformation all along.

Are you still arguing the AZ vaccine has not been cancelled in the UK?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot

So you didn't read it......

You heard that it's been ripped apart.

Have you got a link to the fact check site?

Does your Google not work.

Isn't that the new standard?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Asmodeus3

That's why I was reluctant to share any link because I know the poster has no interest in reading it.

So predictable.

Yes it's up to you whether to share any links or not. Obviously the member doesn't have any interest in reading the paper. He hasn't even created a thread yet on this site. Why is this??

It's a bit sad when these threads turn into an echo chamber with folk discussing other posters rather than the thread topic.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: ScepticScot

So you didn't read it......

You heard that it's been ripped apart.

Have you got a link to the fact check site?

Does your Google not work.

Isn't that the new standard?

I read links when they are supplied......

The pre rollout trials showed 1 in 800 chance of a serious adverse event.....it has not been ripped apart unless you can show otherwise.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
It's a bit sad when these threads turn into an echo chamber with folk discussing other posters rather than the thread topic.

You are sad to even bother to post that.

a reply to: ScepticScot

We've got a right pair of wallies here.

a reply to: alldaylong

Wallies are false teeth were ScepticScot is.