It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Yeah they just want their privacy and to be left alone. That's why they don mankinis and parade around our streets covered in glitter, are overly represented throughout our media and need to tell their stories to children in schools.
originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: Grenade
My point is that perverts are everywhere, linked them with a specific group of people when there aren't (as far as I know) any data to support that idea is, to me, dangerous, as it inflames even more the "us versus them" situation that only helps those that want to divide the population.
originally posted by: DragonsDemesne
My question to any of the people who think there are more than two genders is this:
Can you name a third gender?
None of them can. Because there are two.
1. Agender: A person who does not identify themselves with or experience any gender. Agender people are also called null-gender, genderless, gendervoid, or neutral gender.
2. Abimegender: Associated with being profound, deep, and infinite. The term abimegender may be used alone or in combination with other genders.
3.Adamas gender: A gender that is indefinable or indomitable. People identifying with this gender refuse to be categorized in any particular gender identity.
4.Aerogender: Also called evaisgender, this gender identity changes according to one’s surroundings.
originally posted by: Grenade
I get it, there's several professions i also associate with sexual perversion.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: Grenade
I get it, there's several professions i also associate with sexual perversion.
That's also my point, do not associate specific professions with sexual perversion, a pervert can be anywhere.
In fact, most of the cases of sexual abuse of minors happen in the family or close "friends" circles.
Sure, predators will look for victims where they have more chances of getting them and avoid being caught (and that's why in Portugal we have criminal checks for anyone that works with children, although that, naturally, is not enough), but generalising is never good.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Are you sure this isn't the case when drag queens are around little children trying to teach them about sex or sexual habits and sexual behaviour.
I mean it's rather obvious there something fundamentally wrong when adult males are dressed up like women trying to teach sex and genders to kids.
originally posted by: ketsuko
You should.
Any job where you gain access to children is prone to pedophile interest especially if you are an adult placed in a special position of trust with those children.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Are you sure this isn't the case when drag queens are around little children trying to teach them about sex or sexual habits and sexual behaviour.
No, I'm not sure, as I don't know the person.
And, according to the second article, the one that talks about the results of the investigation, says that the person was invited to talk about "gender-neutral language and the concept of gender in the LGBTQ+ environment" and that sex was never mentioned.
I mean it's rather obvious there something fundamentally wrong when adult males are dressed up like women trying to teach sex and genders to kids.
That was not the case, according to the results of the investigation (apparently).
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
What investigation and what results? If you mean the Guardian Article, we all know this is a leftist newspaper that tries to downplay the incident and similar incidents.
Yes, he/she was invited to the School. Didn't turn up on their own. But he/she shouldn't have been invited in the first place.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
What investigation and what results? If you mean the Guardian Article, we all know this is a leftist newspaper that tries to downplay the incident and similar incidents.
I mean the investigation that the Guardian article talks about, mentioned by the education minister Julie Edge.
Yes, he/she was invited to the School. Didn't turn up on their own. But he/she shouldn't have been invited in the first place.
I agree. If the intention was to talk about "gender neutral language and the concept of gender in the LGBTQ+ environment" they should have invited specialists on both topics, not someone that is not expected to have an impartial opinion about something that is not black and white.