Tucker Carlson releases the first wave of videos from Jan 6th

a reply to: IAMTAT

A load of them were from other places bar Washington IAMTAT.

They did not have all those weapons confiscated going to sing "Kum ba yah" but "Hang Mike Pence".

And they were not a random group of people, but there for a specific reason, aka to do the bidding of Trump and stop the proceedings taking place in the building.

Make as many excuses for them as you please IAMTAT, but their intentions were clear and the world can see that just fine.

Same as your courts did, and continue to do so.

No
The entire focus of the January 6 Committee was to create a false narrative to stop Trump from reelection.
As evidence in this thread that got destroyed in 1 segment by Tucker Carlson.

It must suck to be married to the liberal left right now

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Arnie123

Here's the thing you seem to be ignoring. Footage of people being violent and breaking the law is proof that people were being violent and breaking the law. Footage not showing people being violent nor breaking the law does not prove that that people weren't being violent nor breaking the law.

The J6 committee was focused on the violence and law breaking going on that day so of course they're going to show the footage that shows those things.

What exactly does Tucker's footage prove?

Schumer + McConnell = UniParty?

Source: townhall.com...

What's the definition of UniParty?

a reply to: Nevercompromise

Like when Chris Christie slipped up to let everyone know he will be indicted just before the first RNC debate?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

The armed mob smashed open a window AndyFromMichigan, entered through the window, and either opened the doors from the inside themselves or had them opened.

That's not how you get invited into a building by my guess, or anything reminiscent of such.

More like a home invasion than any sort of invitation.

And what about the gallows they erected outside the place, and the chants about hanging people?

The people were there for more than just a picnic, they were there for blood and to disrupt the proceedings.

HA! Yeah, just a bunch of ol Johnny Ringos running around, hahaha!!! You guys are so dramatic

a reply to: litterbaux

How many people do you know that bought into this "insurrection" hook, line and sinker? Were they also the ones that put a mask on and lined up for experimental injections?

A lot appearantly.
As to the injections,

Matt Hancock wanted to “deploy” a new Covid variant to “frighten the pants off” the public and ensure they complied with lockdown, leaked messages seen by The Telegraph have revealed. The Lockdown Files – more than 100,000 WhatsApp messages sent between ministers, officials and others – show how the Government used scare tactics to force compliance and push through lockdowns.

That was just as sinister.


Interesting how some scream when the timeline and facts are revealed.

originally posted by: SourGrapes
a reply to: andy06shake

"Armed mob"?

They had Trump signs and Trump flags. Yes the left were claiming they were armed because of that.

According to the filing of Brunson v Adams the basis is there were 100 Congressmen that wanted and intended to question and investigate these allegations of fraud.
By Constitutional mandate, according to the filing, they were mandated to hear it and investigate it.
This is the motive for Nancy and co. to orchestrated the Reishtag event on January 6.
And now it gets exposed

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
a reply to: Xcalibur254
Do you think after the 5 swing states stopped counting votes at the same time with Trump ahead and did not complete vote totals for over a week, over 5k sworn affidavits of election workers and others witnessing election fraud And mathematical anomalies that were not characterized as circumstantial but characterized as not possible....do you think at that point that Congress had a Constitutional obligation to pause the certification and investigate?

a reply to: LSU2018
Trump is a dangerous thing.

As the left grapples with their failing narrative, I can't help but laugh.

Truly amazing to see.

This is the expected norm, nothing the democrats have accused have come to pass.

You'll think, after so many failed attempts....

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: LSU2018
Trump is a dangerous thing.

To the liberal progressive Hive minds, YUP.

originally posted by: Arnie123
As the left grapples with their failing narrative, I can't help but laugh.

Truly amazing to see.

This is the expected norm, nothing the democrats have accused have come to pass.

You'll think, after so many failed attempts....

Nope
Same bull crap from the same peddlers

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: DBCowboy

I counted and watched the videos.

True but it's what they had in their paws that were dangerous and of concern.

Most of the evil insurrectionists and MAGA mobsters did have arms.

Well, it would have been rather hard to storm buildings and smash the place up or build those gallows using only their feet.

So now you're mocking the handicapable.

Well done.

First they came for the MAGA
But I was not MAGA so I didn't care
Then they came for the handicapable
But I was not handicapable so I did not care. . . .

The Schummer-0-Luv taught me that only pallets of bricks and shields can be used to destroy things and fight/attack police in a true peaceful protest. There was also nothing looted and stolen from the Capitol (besides an attempt at democrat souls) or set ablaze so that's a big negative too, and also takes away from the qualifiers of what makes a protest peaceful. Breaking out one window, screaming at a cop, and forcing yourself through one door isn't peaceful, it's an insurrection.

I was very disappointed in the Supreme Court for passing on that however I did read the Brunson Brothers are still working on it.
I guess the constitutional oath our elected officials take is just for show.

originally posted by: Nevercompromise
According to the filing of Brunson v Adams the basis is there were 100 Congressmen that wanted and intended to question and investigate these allegations of fraud.
By Constitutional mandate, according to the filing, they were mandated to hear it and investigate it.
This is the motive for Nancy and co. to orchestrated the Reishtag event on January 6.
And now it gets exposed

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
a reply to: Xcalibur254
Do you think after the 5 swing states stopped counting votes at the same time with Trump ahead and did not complete vote totals for over a week, over 5k sworn affidavits of election workers and others witnessing election fraud And mathematical anomalies that were not characterized as circumstantial but characterized as not possible....do you think at that point that Congress had a Constitutional obligation to pause the certification and investigate?

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
a reply to: Xcalibur254
Do you think after the 5 swing states stopped counting votes at the same time with Trump ahead and did not complete vote totals for over a week, over 5k sworn affidavits of election workers and others witnessing election fraud And mathematical anomalies that were not characterized as circumstantial but characterized as not possible....do you think at that point that Congress had a Constitutional obligation to pause the certification and investigate?

You're wasting your time. They got the results they wanted. Dominion could come out and give a message that they were paid to screw with the votes, the poll workers could make a statement that they were paid to miscount in Biden's favor, and the left still wouldn't change their mind. They don't care about honesty, not these days, they just care about power and that's why the democrat party and all involved with it are a cancer on this country.

It's emerging that Nancy Pelosis is the sole architect of this endeavor.

Make no mistake, Pelosis is the Palpatine of the Democrat forces. She certainly is a political master and one Trump fought tooth an nail with over the course of his Presidency.

She was on National TV when she said, "He won't be in office", too bad, her election apparatus was sleeping on the job and it has been nothing but revenge for her.

a reply to: andy06shake

for something that's supposed to be so clear cut and shock proof, why does the wiki have to use so many biased and 2nd hand references and sources????? 😁

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
a reply to: Xcalibur254
Do you think after the 5 swing states stopped counting votes at the same time with Trump ahead and did not complete vote totals for over a week, over 5k sworn affidavits of election workers and others witnessing election fraud And mathematical anomalies that were not characterized as circumstantial but characterized as not possible....do you think at that point that Congress had a Constitutional obligation to pause the certification and investigate?

You're wasting your time. They got the results they wanted. Dominion could come out and give a message that they were paid to screw with the votes, the poll workers could make a statement that they were paid to miscount in Biden's favor, and the left still wouldn't change their mind. They don't care about honesty, not these days, they just care about power and that's why the democrat party and all involved with it are a cancer on this country.

It's truly an impressive force, mass formation. By using orange man as the storyline villain, they can justify anything to prevent him from being president or even having relevance. The ends justify the means, allowing for any atrocity, making the Nazi's look like boy scouts.

a reply to: andy06shake

Or an insurrection. The colonists would have gotten their butts handed to them by the Brits with that ... oh, they had guns.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Lots of these pics and vids are staged and some are "shopped" for better effects. Notice how oh-so perfect they all are 😁