Almost 10% of blood sampled in blood bank contaminated with MRNA from vaccines.

igorchudov.substack.com...

Vaccinated Blood is Contaminated with COVID Vaccine mRNA, Study Finds

We surprisingly found fragments of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA up to 28 days postvaccination in blood from chronic HCV patients vaccinated with mRNA vaccines from both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

…

of the 108 patient samples, 10 samples (9.3%) had partial or up to full sequences of the vaccine mRNA sequence (Fig. 1), identified from one to 28 days postvaccination. There was ~100% identity between the detected mRNA nucleotide sequences found in plasma and the specific mRNA vaccine given. The 10 samples had a median of 5.5 million raw read pairs available (see Table S1). Breadth and depth of coverage of the vaccine mRNA sequences ranged from completeness and >20 000, respectively, to short fragments with a depth of coverage of 100 (Fig. 1). None of the negative or the HCV-positive controls had SARS-CoV-2 matching reads.

So lets all hope we have no need for blood infusion in the future, because if your blood is pure now, it may not be afterwards.

No injections/boosters in my body. Wonder if my clean blood will be wanted now?

Unless tptb snuck the mrna in my body somehow.

Us purebloods better keep quiet , we might be harvested for our blood. Or use us for breeding!

originally posted by: Enduro
No injections/boosters in my body. Wonder if my clean blood will be wanted now?

Unless tptb snuck the mrna in my body somehow.

Us purebloods better keep quiet , we might be harvested for our blood. Or use us for breeding!

Shedding would accomplish that. Pfizers own documentation said to keep pregnant women out of the same room as vaccinated people. It's definitely spreading to the unvaxxt to some degree.

Why wouldn't it have mRNA? Everyone has mRNA in their body.

a reply to: JBurns

Unsurprisingly the nucleotide sequences caveat went over your head.

originally posted by: JBurns
Why wouldn't it have mRNA? Everyone has mRNA in their body.

Ummm. learn to read?

"We surprisingly found fragments of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA up to 28 days postvaccination in blood from chronic HCV patients vaccinated with mRNA vaccines from both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna"...

Highlighted the hard parts for ya...

Although I'm not sure why they were surprised.

Also, I'm actually very surprised iwas only 10%...

a reply to: MaxxAction

There is some good news there.

More than 10% of the population has received at least the first shots. That means that at least some people who have had the shot are donating and not contaminated. That would mean it doesn't stay in your system forever. So any damage should be limited.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Ah, my mistake No need to take it so personally.

originally posted by: JBurns
Why wouldn't it have mRNA? Everyone has mRNA in their body.

So any mRNA that codes for anything is ok because it's "mRNA"? It's not even normal mRNA, they substituted uridine for pseudouridine.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: JBurns

Unsurprisingly the nucleotide sequences caveat went over your head.

As a non-scientist it is not surprising to me either

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yeah, it seems OK to me. I haven't see any evidence showing that is harmful. That 10% seems to be doing quite fine, or was there more to the story?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

How can you tell though?

I hug my vax mother and sister from time to time and definitely work in an office with at least 50% vax people and so yeah?

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

How can you tell though?

I hug my vax mother and sister from time to time and definitely work in an office with at least 50% vax people and so yeah?

You can't, right now alot of these things are theories but there is evidence from Pfizer themselves and unvaxxt can mysteriously get the same symptoms as vaxxt counterparts after sharing bodily fluids.

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yeah, it seems OK to me. I haven't see any evidence showing that is harmful. That 10% seems to be doing quite fine, or was there more to the story?

So any mRNA is OK no matter what it codes for? You're being serious?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

As a non-scientist I would clearly benefit from an explanation.

What is wrong with this blood? Is it not usable?

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

As a non-scientist I would clearly benefit from an explanation.

What is wrong with this blood? Is it not usable?

How are you making arguments about any of this without basic knowledge?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I am thankful then that I do not swap bodily fluids with my family or my coworkers lol.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

What arguments have I made? I am asking for clarification.

What is the big deal about vaccine markers showing up in 10% of blood donations? Far more than 10% have gotten a shot. Just not sure what you think these numbers demonstrate.

Where is the harm? What is the danger?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

That evil mRNA, first discovered in 1956.

Time travelling sneaky vaccines again:

www.britannica.com...

We all have it and always have.