Dr Anastasia Loupis: This is the biggest scandal in medical history, Pfizer Trial Hid injuries

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The mother of the injured girl wants treatments for these types of harms. Nobody is saying the vaccines do not cause severe adverse reactions, only that they don't cause these severe adverse reactions in the high numbers you want us to believe.

The mother of the girl and the group behind the ad have not provided any evidence that the girl was diagnosed as harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine.

The ad was paid for by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, an anti-vaccine group founded last month by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch, known for inventing the optical mouse, and more recently for advocating unproven Covid cures and against vaccines, which he calls “toxic.”

Burgert warned these tactics could be effective.

“They’re going to get their claws into a new group of hesitant families that otherwise have got all of their vaccines on time,” she said. “I’m concerned that they’re going to be able to use their manipulation tactics and psychological tactics to harness a new group of formerly pro-vaccine families into vaccine hesitancy.”

In a statement, the girl’s mother, Stephanie de Garay, said her entire family was “pro-vaccine” and that ads like the one featuring her daughter were necessary to “develop treatments for these harms.”

“It is unfortunate that ‘pro-vaccine advocates’ feel the need to dismiss those injured by vaccines in order to promote vaccines,” she said in an email.

www.nbcnews.com...

We need to follow-up with the findings of the judge in the court case to see if the harm was actually caused by the vaccine.

I don't think so. There's been 1000s of threads of evidence on ATS alone. 1500+ studies, Nobel prize winners, most published doctors, top statisticians, whistle blowers, a former VP of Pfizer, whistle blower from WHO, nurses, doctors from every field, under takers, the guy who was the VP of eco health alliance, the world expert on patents. There's way more than enough evidence already and has been for over a year.

Well if harm can be proved then they deserve to be compensated and the company dismantled. Is there even a court case pending, I can't find one? In fact all that is out there is vaccine hesitancy people and groups using this poor girl as their poster child in their posts.

Harm has been proved on many other occasions where coroners or medical examiners have been involved and autopsies performed. If autopsies are allowed to go ahead and if the coroners or medical examiners are willing to do their job properly

Here is one such case

ground.news...

Autopsy Reveals Healthy 36-Year-Old Mother Died from First Dose of Covid Pfizer Vaccine
Summary by Ground News

Dawn Wooldridge received her first dose of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine last June 4. After eleven days following her vaccination, she died unexpectedly. An inquest heard that the unexpected death was likely caused as a result of the vaccination. Dr Sukhvinder Ghataura told the coroner: 'It is more than likely Dawn died in response to the Covid jab' Her husband Ashley was visibly shocked in the coroner's room.

So should Pfizer be dismantled? As you said above.

What vaccine hesitancy are you talking about?? Are you living in a different universe??

I suppose I am living in a different world than most of you, I live in a world where evidence-based science which is peer reviewed, so, yes, I am.

This poor child is being exploited by vaccine hesitancy groups and people all over the net, it's shameful.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The mother of the injured girl wants treatments for these types of harms. Nobody is saying the vaccines do not cause severe adverse reactions, only that they don't cause these severe adverse reactions in the high numbers you want us to believe.

The mother of the girl and the group behind the ad have not provided any evidence that the girl was diagnosed as harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine.

The ad was paid for by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, an anti-vaccine group founded last month by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch, known for inventing the optical mouse, and more recently for advocating unproven Covid cures and against vaccines, which he calls “toxic.”

Burgert warned these tactics could be effective.

“They’re going to get their claws into a new group of hesitant families that otherwise have got all of their vaccines on time,” she said. “I’m concerned that they’re going to be able to use their manipulation tactics and psychological tactics to harness a new group of formerly pro-vaccine families into vaccine hesitancy.”

In a statement, the girl’s mother, Stephanie de Garay, said her entire family was “pro-vaccine” and that ads like the one featuring her daughter were necessary to “develop treatments for these harms.”

“It is unfortunate that ‘pro-vaccine advocates’ feel the need to dismiss those injured by vaccines in order to promote vaccines,” she said in an email.

www.nbcnews.com...

We need to follow-up with the findings of the judge in the court case to see if the harm was actually caused by the vaccine.

I don't think so. There's been 1000s of threads of evidence on ATS alone. 1500+ studies, Nobel prize winners, most published doctors, top statisticians, whistle blowers, a former VP of Pfizer, whistle blower from WHO, nurses, doctors from every field, under takers, the guy who was the VP of eco health alliance, the world expert on patents. There's way more than enough evidence already and has been for over a year.

Well if harm can be proved then they deserve to be compensated and the company dismantled. Is there even a court case pending, I can't find one? In fact all that is out there is vaccine hesitancy people and groups using this poor girl as their poster child in their posts.

Harm has been proved on many other occasions where coroners or medical examiners have been involved and autopsies performed. If autopsies are allowed to go ahead and if the coroners or medical examiners are willing to do their job properly

Here is one such case

ground.news...

Autopsy Reveals Healthy 36-Year-Old Mother Died from First Dose of Covid Pfizer Vaccine
Summary by Ground News

Dawn Wooldridge received her first dose of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine last June 4. After eleven days following her vaccination, she died unexpectedly. An inquest heard that the unexpected death was likely caused as a result of the vaccination. Dr Sukhvinder Ghataura told the coroner: 'It is more than likely Dawn died in response to the Covid jab' Her husband Ashley was visibly shocked in the coroner's room.

So should Pfizer be dismantled? As you said above.

What vaccine hesitancy are you talking about?? Are you living in a different universe??

I suppose I am living in a different world than most of you, I live in a world where evidence-based science which is peer reviewed, so, yes, I am.

This poor child is being exploited by vaccine hesitancy groups and people all over the net, it's shameful.

You said that if harm can be proved, which has been proved in many other cases, then the victims must be compensated and the pharmaceuticals to be dismantled. I think most will agree with you on this one.

I gave you two examples of deaths caused by these vaccines.

I don't think anyone is exploiting the case.

I am referring you to Dr Anastasia Loupis from which I have learnt the case myself who said that this is the biggest scandal in medical history.

It looks like many doctors are also seeing what we are all seeing.

Your relationship with science and peer reviewed publications is non existent as many of us we have noticed. You are struggling in the basic definitions I am afraid.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The mother of the injured girl wants treatments for these types of harms. Nobody is saying the vaccines do not cause severe adverse reactions, only that they don't cause these severe adverse reactions in the high numbers you want us to believe.

The mother of the girl and the group behind the ad have not provided any evidence that the girl was diagnosed as harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine.

The ad was paid for by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, an anti-vaccine group founded last month by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch, known for inventing the optical mouse, and more recently for advocating unproven Covid cures and against vaccines, which he calls “toxic.”

Burgert warned these tactics could be effective.

“They’re going to get their claws into a new group of hesitant families that otherwise have got all of their vaccines on time,” she said. “I’m concerned that they’re going to be able to use their manipulation tactics and psychological tactics to harness a new group of formerly pro-vaccine families into vaccine hesitancy.”

In a statement, the girl’s mother, Stephanie de Garay, said her entire family was “pro-vaccine” and that ads like the one featuring her daughter were necessary to “develop treatments for these harms.”

“It is unfortunate that ‘pro-vaccine advocates’ feel the need to dismiss those injured by vaccines in order to promote vaccines,” she said in an email.

www.nbcnews.com...

We need to follow-up with the findings of the judge in the court case to see if the harm was actually caused by the vaccine.

I don't think so. There's been 1000s of threads of evidence on ATS alone. 1500+ studies, Nobel prize winners, most published doctors, top statisticians, whistle blowers, a former VP of Pfizer, whistle blower from WHO, nurses, doctors from every field, under takers, the guy who was the VP of eco health alliance, the world expert on patents. There's way more than enough evidence already and has been for over a year.

Well if harm can be proved then they deserve to be compensated and the company dismantled.

Your words

Harm has been proven in many other cases. Should the Pharmaceuticals be dismantled?

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Yes, I do not dismiss injury claims from others, but it seems doubtful that this family can prove injury when the doctor's have already diagnosed it as not being vaccine related. I just can't find any information anywhere about a court case, can you?

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The mother of the injured girl wants treatments for these types of harms. Nobody is saying the vaccines do not cause severe adverse reactions, only that they don't cause these severe adverse reactions in the high numbers you want us to believe.

The mother of the girl and the group behind the ad have not provided any evidence that the girl was diagnosed as harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine.

The ad was paid for by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, an anti-vaccine group founded last month by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch, known for inventing the optical mouse, and more recently for advocating unproven Covid cures and against vaccines, which he calls “toxic.”

Burgert warned these tactics could be effective.

“They’re going to get their claws into a new group of hesitant families that otherwise have got all of their vaccines on time,” she said. “I’m concerned that they’re going to be able to use their manipulation tactics and psychological tactics to harness a new group of formerly pro-vaccine families into vaccine hesitancy.”

In a statement, the girl’s mother, Stephanie de Garay, said her entire family was “pro-vaccine” and that ads like the one featuring her daughter were necessary to “develop treatments for these harms.”

“It is unfortunate that ‘pro-vaccine advocates’ feel the need to dismiss those injured by vaccines in order to promote vaccines,” she said in an email.

www.nbcnews.com...

We need to follow-up with the findings of the judge in the court case to see if the harm was actually caused by the vaccine.

I don't think so. There's been 1000s of threads of evidence on ATS alone. 1500+ studies, Nobel prize winners, most published doctors, top statisticians, whistle blowers, a former VP of Pfizer, whistle blower from WHO, nurses, doctors from every field, under takers, the guy who was the VP of eco health alliance, the world expert on patents. There's way more than enough evidence already and has been for over a year.

Well if harm can be proved then they deserve to be compensated and the company dismantled.

Your words

Harm has been proven in many other cases. Should the Pharmaceuticals be dismantled?

Harm needs to be proven in this case but it is doubtful that it will be.

a reply to: quintessentone

Let leave this case for a moment.

You said

Well if harm can be proved then they deserve to be compensated and the company dismantled

Well, it has been proven in many other cases. I gave you two in this thread. So should Pfizer and Moderna be dismantled?

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: quintessentone

Let leave this case for a moment.

You said

Well if harm can be proved then they deserve to be compensated and the company dismantled

Well, it has been proven in many other cases. I gave you two in this thread. So should Pfizer and Moderna be dismantled?

I am asking specifically about this case and since you are pushing that other cases have been proven, why isn't the company dismantled right now?

So should Pfizer be dismantled?

As more is gradually coming out with all the confidential agreements signed, this thing is bigger than Pfizer. Even if Pfizer was to be forced to shut down, what is to stop a change in the corporate name as business continues as usual?

At the moment Pfizer is going 'the government told me to do it' and it does look like Defense Department has a big hand it in. It is those that organized and directed Event 201 that are high on this suspect list.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The mother of the injured girl wants treatments for these types of harms. Nobody is saying the vaccines do not cause severe adverse reactions, only that they don't cause these severe adverse reactions in the high numbers you want us to believe.

The mother of the girl and the group behind the ad have not provided any evidence that the girl was diagnosed as harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine.

The ad was paid for by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, an anti-vaccine group founded last month by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch, known for inventing the optical mouse, and more recently for advocating unproven Covid cures and against vaccines, which he calls “toxic.”

Burgert warned these tactics could be effective.

“They’re going to get their claws into a new group of hesitant families that otherwise have got all of their vaccines on time,” she said. “I’m concerned that they’re going to be able to use their manipulation tactics and psychological tactics to harness a new group of formerly pro-vaccine families into vaccine hesitancy.”

In a statement, the girl’s mother, Stephanie de Garay, said her entire family was “pro-vaccine” and that ads like the one featuring her daughter were necessary to “develop treatments for these harms.”

“It is unfortunate that ‘pro-vaccine advocates’ feel the need to dismiss those injured by vaccines in order to promote vaccines,” she said in an email.

www.nbcnews.com...

We need to follow-up with the findings of the judge in the court case to see if the harm was actually caused by the vaccine.

I don't think so. There's been 1000s of threads of evidence on ATS alone. 1500+ studies, Nobel prize winners, most published doctors, top statisticians, whistle blowers, a former VP of Pfizer, whistle blower from WHO, nurses, doctors from every field, under takers, the guy who was the VP of eco health alliance, the world expert on patents. There's way more than enough evidence already and has been for over a year.

Well if harm can be proved then they deserve to be compensated and the company dismantled. Is there even a court case pending, I can't find one? In fact all that is out there is vaccine hesitancy people and groups using this poor girl as their poster child in their posts.

Harm has been proved on many other occasions where coroners or medical examiners have been involved and autopsies performed. If autopsies are allowed to go ahead and if the coroners or medical examiners are willing to do their job properly

Here is one such case

ground.news...

Autopsy Reveals Healthy 36-Year-Old Mother Died from First Dose of Covid Pfizer Vaccine
Summary by Ground News

Dawn Wooldridge received her first dose of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine last June 4. After eleven days following her vaccination, she died unexpectedly. An inquest heard that the unexpected death was likely caused as a result of the vaccination. Dr Sukhvinder Ghataura told the coroner: 'It is more than likely Dawn died in response to the Covid jab' Her husband Ashley was visibly shocked in the coroner's room.

So should Pfizer be dismantled? As you said above.

What vaccine hesitancy are you talking about?? Are you living in a different universe??

I suppose I am living in a different world than most of you, I live in a world where evidence-based science which is peer reviewed, so, yes, I am.

This poor child is being exploited by vaccine hesitancy groups and people all over the net, it's shameful.

As it is a minor child endangerment charges would be appropriate, for the parents and corporation.

originally posted by: kwakakev

So should Pfizer be dismantled?

As more is gradually coming out with all the confidential agreements signed, this thing is bigger than Pfizer. Even if Pfizer was to be forced to shut down, what is to stop a change in the corporate name as business continues as usual?

At the moment Pfizer is going 'the government told me to do it' and it does look like Defense Department has a big hand it in. It is those that organized and directed Event 201 that are high on this suspect list.

WEF funded event 201 about "fictional" coronavirus pandemic along with Bill Gates. Coronavirus "magically mutates" in nature within a few months and causes pandemic in 2020, right on cue for Agenda 2030 and the great reset which Klaus schwab published his book covid 19 the great reset within a few months of the declared pandemic.

Its later discovered the vaccines were created by DoD and darpa as medical counter measures and only distributed through big pharma. Because of the public private partnership this shields big pharma.

Why did they push these counter measures so hard and who was really behind it? Seems like bilderberg and the national security state.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: quintessentone

Let leave this case for a moment.

You said

Well if harm can be proved then they deserve to be compensated and the company dismantled

Well, it has been proven in many other cases. I gave you two in this thread. So should Pfizer and Moderna be dismantled?

I am asking specifically about this case and since you are pushing that other cases have been proven, why isn't the company dismantled right now?

Yes that's a very good question. If you say harm merits compensation for the families and merits punishment for the pharmaceuticals, it looks like only the former happens but in a controlled way where the victims are paid directly by the State and not by the pharmaceuticals.

a reply to: quintessentone

From the opening page

The US District Court of Texas ordered FDA to release documents of clinical trials of the Covid-19 shots after getting sued by attorneys at Siri & Glimstad. The documents revealed Pfizer classifying adverse events as non-related to the vaccine

In a few words Pfizer lying and deceiving the authorities and the public for once more.

She was too outspoken according to what the Danish government liked...

This article is from 2021:

Danish doctor censored

a reply to: Asmodeus3
The way Maddie has been treated by her doctors parallels something in a family I know.

A teen girl developed full body tremors. I've seen a video of her strapped down in the hospital. Her doctors insist it's psychological as her sister is dying. She will have been vaccinated as she the older sister isn't doing well with leukemia and is in/out of hospital with the family spending much time with her. The doctors refuse to do any further testing on the younger daughter to find any physical cause of her tremors as she had an epileptic fit as a young child and they insist that if it isn't psychological it's epilepsy. The family can't even get as second opinion and one of the mother's friends have offered to take the girl to another region to stay so that she can go to emergency when it happens and get treated by a fresh set of doctors.

Terrible is has to go this far, but this is the situation we are in now whether it's vaccine adverse reactions or even a consult about something else as the doctors will not budge and are not open to suggestions or input from the patients/family. Pathetic medical system that is full of lies and those who sold their souls for a career/money.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
twitter.com...

Dr Anastasia-Maria Loupis is another Medical Doctor from Denmark among the very many who have expressed their concerns in relation to the mRNA products that could cause serious harms and death.

The comment made by the Dr Loupis was in relation to the 12 year old (at that time)Maddie de Garay who was a volunteer in a Covid-19 vaccine study by Pfizer and her life changed dramatically post vaccination. The very healthy girl is now in a wheelchair and also requires a feeding tube.

Dr Loupis has responded on the 11th of January 2023 saying that this is the biggest scandal in medical history. She is obviously referring to the vaccination campaign as a whole as far as I understand it.


It is very interesting to see how Pfizer has dealt with such cases.

ehlinelaw.com...

Pfizer Trial Hid Injuries

Before signing up for her Covid-19 vaccine shot, Maddie de Garay was a healthy individual. However, after taking the vaccine, she suffered a severe systemic adverse reaction that changed her life forever.

Stephanie de Garay, a parent of three, allowed her daughters to sign up for the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine shot as the family would financially benefit from taking the “life-saving” vaccine shot as each visit would pay her $119.

Maddie received her first dose of the Pfizer vaccine on December 30, 2020.

After receiving the second dose of the clinical trial shot, the once-healthy Maddie de Garay suffered a severe systemic adverse reaction. The doctors on the first visit to the ER stated that she was probably suffering from the vaccine’s side effects and that it would get better over the next couple of days.

It did not.

As Maddie’s symptoms progressed, Stephanie noted all the details in her notebook. However, things soon headed for worse as Maddie’s health deteriorated. Stephanie took Maddie to the ER three times in one week before finally getting her admitted on her third visit on January 23, 2021.

Instead of medical testing and consultations with medical specialists, the hospital referred Maddie to psychologists as they believed that Maddie’s symptoms arose from her anxiety

Maddie’s symptoms started worsening, and she developed new symptoms, causing her pain and suffering. Soon, she stopped eating and could not continue with her daily routine.

Stephanie retook Maddie to Cincinnati Children’s Hospital (CCH), where Dr. Amal Assa’ad diagnosed her with a functional neurological disorder, stating that her symptoms weren’t the result of the shots.

Assa’ad, in his notes, advised against a further investigation into the matter as it could drive the patient to think that her symptoms have something to do with the vaccine, delaying the necessary psychological intervention she needs.

Frenck, director Vaccine Research Center at CCH, was responsible for ensuring and monitoring the trial participant’s safety and any adverse reactions arising from the vaccine. Disappointingly, he did not offer any help to Maddie despite her health condition becoming worse.

Maddie fainted on February 19, 2021, and started to exhibit memory problems. Medical professionals blamed it on a rubber allergy and hooked her up to an IV. While at the hospital, Maddie woke up during an MRI and fell. Since then, the young girl has been unable to walk.


When signing up for the vaccine trials, the family assumed that Pfizer would take care of any adverse conditions. However, they refused to pay for Maddie’s medical bills and treatments, stating that the expenses were not research-related.

For 1.5 months at the hospital, the doctors treated Maddie’s symptoms as a psychological issue, not a physical one. After Maddie showed no progress, the medical doctors moved her to a mental institution but looking at the conditions at the facility, Maddie’s parents moved her back home.

Pfizer disclosed Maddie’s case to the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) as generalized neuralgia and said she was suffering from functional abdominal pain. Many doctors refused to take the case and provide a proper diagnosis because they feared risking their careers.

After a year and a half, with the help of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) and React19, a nonprofit that offers support for those suffering from long-term COVID-19 shot adverse events, they found doctors willing to conduct the proper tests, who diagnosed several health conditions arising from the Covid-19 vaccination.

The US District Court of Texas ordered FDA to release documents of clinical trials of the Covid-19 shots after getting sued by attorneys at Siri & Glimstad. The documents revealed Pfizer classifying adverse events as non-related to the vaccine.

This is one very important cases as this unfortunate girl who had to go through this ordeal and almost died as a result of these very dangerous products has not been given any help and the doctors 'thought' she was suffering from some sort of psychological condition... Pfizer disclosed Maddie's case as generalised neuralgia.


Not surprising that Pfizer classified serious adverse reactions as non-related to the vaccine.

I listened to her mother speak at the senate hearing with with senator Ron Johnson.

rumble.com...


I also listened to her speak on twitter spaces. At the time they made it seem like this was just another phase of clinical trials, but that was a lie because it was never tested and these are medical countermeasures produced by the DoD which legally don't require any testing.


Pfizer put her paralysis down as a stomach issue in the trial results. Insane lie.


Also in the trials there were more deaths in the vaccine group than in the control group, but what they did was use relative risk instead of absolute risk to hide these results.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Australia’s equivalent of the FDA, the TGA, has been caught (1) having assigned causation to two childhood covid vaccine deaths and then (2) hiding those from the public. One was a 7-year-old boy, the other a 9-year-old girl.

The TGA’s excuse? They “didn’t want to undermine public confidence.”

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Australia’s equivalent of the FDA, the TGA, has been caught (1) having assigned causation to two childhood covid vaccine deaths and then (2) hiding those from the public. One was a 7-year-old boy, the other a 9-year-old girl.

The TGA’s excuse? They “didn’t want to undermine public confidence.”

This is what Pfizer did in the US as well when they lied about trial results. It's what they always do historically.

Poor litle child


Childs trust adults, well mostly anyway, it is the responsibility of adults
To take care children.

The science is settled, the jab is a weapon and causing horrors and deaths IMO.

a reply to: infolurker

The TGA’s excuse? They “didn’t want to undermine public confidence.”

Got a similar line with the last Royal Commission into Child Abuse. There is a lot of toxic stuff for those exposed to it.

originally posted by: Kenzo


Poor litle child

Childs trust adults, well mostly anyway, it is the responsibility of adults
To take care children.

The science is settled, the jab is a weapon and causing horrors and deaths IMO.

It's possible that we haven't seen the worst of it yet. I hope we have but many are suggesting it hasn't even started yet.