Dr Anastasia Loupis: This is the biggest scandal in medical history, Pfizer Trial Hid injuries

twitter.com...

Dr Anastasia-Maria Loupis is another Medical Doctor from Denmark among the very many who have expressed their concerns in relation to the mRNA products that could cause serious harms and death.

The comment made by the Dr Loupis was in relation to the 12 year old (at that time)Maddie de Garay who was a volunteer in a Covid-19 vaccine study by Pfizer and her life changed dramatically post vaccination. The very healthy girl is now in a wheelchair and also requires a feeding tube.

Dr Loupis has responded on the 11th of January 2023 saying that this is the biggest scandal in medical history. She is obviously referring to the vaccination campaign as a whole as far as I understand it.


It is very interesting to see how Pfizer has dealt with such cases.

ehlinelaw.com...

Pfizer Trial Hid Injuries

Before signing up for her Covid-19 vaccine shot, Maddie de Garay was a healthy individual. However, after taking the vaccine, she suffered a severe systemic adverse reaction that changed her life forever.

Stephanie de Garay, a parent of three, allowed her daughters to sign up for the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine shot as the family would financially benefit from taking the “life-saving” vaccine shot as each visit would pay her $119.

Maddie received her first dose of the Pfizer vaccine on December 30, 2020.

After receiving the second dose of the clinical trial shot, the once-healthy Maddie de Garay suffered a severe systemic adverse reaction. The doctors on the first visit to the ER stated that she was probably suffering from the vaccine’s side effects and that it would get better over the next couple of days.

It did not.

As Maddie’s symptoms progressed, Stephanie noted all the details in her notebook. However, things soon headed for worse as Maddie’s health deteriorated. Stephanie took Maddie to the ER three times in one week before finally getting her admitted on her third visit on January 23, 2021.

Instead of medical testing and consultations with medical specialists, the hospital referred Maddie to psychologists as they believed that Maddie’s symptoms arose from her anxiety

Maddie’s symptoms started worsening, and she developed new symptoms, causing her pain and suffering. Soon, she stopped eating and could not continue with her daily routine.

Stephanie retook Maddie to Cincinnati Children’s Hospital (CCH), where Dr. Amal Assa’ad diagnosed her with a functional neurological disorder, stating that her symptoms weren’t the result of the shots.

Assa’ad, in his notes, advised against a further investigation into the matter as it could drive the patient to think that her symptoms have something to do with the vaccine, delaying the necessary psychological intervention she needs.

Frenck, director Vaccine Research Center at CCH, was responsible for ensuring and monitoring the trial participant’s safety and any adverse reactions arising from the vaccine. Disappointingly, he did not offer any help to Maddie despite her health condition becoming worse.

Maddie fainted on February 19, 2021, and started to exhibit memory problems. Medical professionals blamed it on a rubber allergy and hooked her up to an IV. While at the hospital, Maddie woke up during an MRI and fell. Since then, the young girl has been unable to walk.


When signing up for the vaccine trials, the family assumed that Pfizer would take care of any adverse conditions. However, they refused to pay for Maddie’s medical bills and treatments, stating that the expenses were not research-related.

For 1.5 months at the hospital, the doctors treated Maddie’s symptoms as a psychological issue, not a physical one. After Maddie showed no progress, the medical doctors moved her to a mental institution but looking at the conditions at the facility, Maddie’s parents moved her back home.

Pfizer disclosed Maddie’s case to the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) as generalized neuralgia and said she was suffering from functional abdominal pain. Many doctors refused to take the case and provide a proper diagnosis because they feared risking their careers.

After a year and a half, with the help of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) and React19, a nonprofit that offers support for those suffering from long-term COVID-19 shot adverse events, they found doctors willing to conduct the proper tests, who diagnosed several health conditions arising from the Covid-19 vaccination.

The US District Court of Texas ordered FDA to release documents of clinical trials of the Covid-19 shots after getting sued by attorneys at Siri & Glimstad. The documents revealed Pfizer classifying adverse events as non-related to the vaccine.

This is one very important cases as this unfortunate girl who had to go through this ordeal and almost died as a result of these very dangerous products has not been given any help and the doctors 'thought' she was suffering from some sort of psychological condition... Pfizer disclosed Maddie's case as generalised neuralgia.


Not surprising that Pfizer classified serious adverse reactions as non-related to the vaccine.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not surprising that Pfizer classified serious adverse reactions as non-related to the vaccine.

How they ever convinced the masses that "serious adverse reactions" are not related to the vaccinations is beyond me. The very name of "adverse reactions" can only apply to a vaccination. When you're sick with something, it's called being "infected." Of course the body has "reactions" to sickness. "Adverse reactions" is a term for something other than sickness induced "reactions."

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not surprising that Pfizer classified serious adverse reactions as non-related to the vaccine.

How they ever convinced the masses that "serious adverse reactions" are not related to the vaccine is beyond me. The very name of "adverse reactions" can only apply to a vaccine. When you're sick with something, it's called being "infected." Of course the body has "reactions" to sickness. "Adverse reactions" is a term for something other than sickness induced "reactions."

Mass formation psychosis maybe the answer.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

The mother of the injured girl wants treatments for these types of harms. Nobody is saying the vaccines do not cause severe adverse reactions, only that they don't cause these severe adverse reactions in the high numbers you want us to believe.

The mother of the girl and the group behind the ad have not provided any evidence that the girl was diagnosed as harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine.

The ad was paid for by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, an anti-vaccine group founded last month by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch, known for inventing the optical mouse, and more recently for advocating unproven Covid cures and against vaccines, which he calls “toxic.”

Burgert warned these tactics could be effective.

“They’re going to get their claws into a new group of hesitant families that otherwise have got all of their vaccines on time,” she said. “I’m concerned that they’re going to be able to use their manipulation tactics and psychological tactics to harness a new group of formerly pro-vaccine families into vaccine hesitancy.”

In a statement, the girl’s mother, Stephanie de Garay, said her entire family was “pro-vaccine” and that ads like the one featuring her daughter were necessary to “develop treatments for these harms.”

“It is unfortunate that ‘pro-vaccine advocates’ feel the need to dismiss those injured by vaccines in order to promote vaccines,” she said in an email.

www.nbcnews.com...

We need to follow-up with the findings of the judge in the court case to see if the harm was actually caused by the vaccine.

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The mother of the injured girl wants treatments for these types of harms. Nobody is saying the vaccines do not cause severe adverse reactions, only that they don't cause these severe adverse reactions in the high numbers you want us to believe.

The mother of the girl and the group behind the ad have not provided any evidence that the girl was diagnosed as harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine.

The ad was paid for by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, an anti-vaccine group founded last month by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch, known for inventing the optical mouse, and more recently for advocating unproven Covid cures and against vaccines, which he calls “toxic.”

Burgert warned these tactics could be effective.

“They’re going to get their claws into a new group of hesitant families that otherwise have got all of their vaccines on time,” she said. “I’m concerned that they’re going to be able to use their manipulation tactics and psychological tactics to harness a new group of formerly pro-vaccine families into vaccine hesitancy.”

In a statement, the girl’s mother, Stephanie de Garay, said her entire family was “pro-vaccine” and that ads like the one featuring her daughter were necessary to “develop treatments for these harms.”

“It is unfortunate that ‘pro-vaccine advocates’ feel the need to dismiss those injured by vaccines in order to promote vaccines,” she said in an email.

www.nbcnews.com...

We need to follow-up with the findings of the judge in the court case to see if the harm was actually caused by the vaccine.

No need for vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality and no need for defending of the Pharmaceuticals

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The mother of the injured girl wants treatments for these types of harms. Nobody is saying the vaccines do not cause severe adverse reactions, only that they don't cause these severe adverse reactions in the high numbers you want us to believe.

The mother of the girl and the group behind the ad have not provided any evidence that the girl was diagnosed as harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine.

The ad was paid for by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, an anti-vaccine group founded last month by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch, known for inventing the optical mouse, and more recently for advocating unproven Covid cures and against vaccines, which he calls “toxic.”

Burgert warned these tactics could be effective.

“They’re going to get their claws into a new group of hesitant families that otherwise have got all of their vaccines on time,” she said. “I’m concerned that they’re going to be able to use their manipulation tactics and psychological tactics to harness a new group of formerly pro-vaccine families into vaccine hesitancy.”

In a statement, the girl’s mother, Stephanie de Garay, said her entire family was “pro-vaccine” and that ads like the one featuring her daughter were necessary to “develop treatments for these harms.”

“It is unfortunate that ‘pro-vaccine advocates’ feel the need to dismiss those injured by vaccines in order to promote vaccines,” she said in an email.

www.nbcnews.com...

We need to follow-up with the findings of the judge in the court case to see if the harm was actually caused by the vaccine.

No need for vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality and no need for defending of the Pharmaceuticals

The mother of the injured girl is defending pharmaceuticals, in so much as she wants treatments for these types of harms. Try to read my posts next time.

What was done to push this through is inexcusable.

This is the doctor's diagnosis of the girl's condition.

The only diagnosis we've gotten for her is that it's Conversion Disorder or Functional Neurologic Symptom Disorder and they are blaming it on anxiety. Ironically she did not have anxiety before the vaccine. And the problem that we had is this was noted in her records early on -- so any time she saw any new specialist, because it was all in the same hospital, they already had their diagnosis before they even saw her.

leadstories.com...

From the Functional Neurological Disorder Society:

We have become aware of a very small number of high-profile social media videos suggesting major neurological complications following vaccination against COVID 19. Whilst we do not wish to comment specifically on any case, we would state, as general comment, that many of the clinical features reported and observed on video in some cases are those of functional neurological disorder (FND). FND can be diagnosed with good accuracy from videos on social media where they are often confused with other neurological conditions.

Hiding adverse reactions in testing should be grounds for loss of indemnity as it removed informed consent - the company needs to be run out of business and executives need be jailed.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

The comment made by the Dr Loupis was in relation to the 12 year old (at that time)Maddie de Garay who was a volunteer in a Covid-19 vaccine study by Pfizer

Wait what!? This mother subjected her daughter to be a Guinea Pig for big Pharma?!?!

The mom should be the one in the wheelchair for what she did.

Poor little girl.

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The mother of the injured girl wants treatments for these types of harms. Nobody is saying the vaccines do not cause severe adverse reactions, only that they don't cause these severe adverse reactions in the high numbers you want us to believe.

The mother of the girl and the group behind the ad have not provided any evidence that the girl was diagnosed as harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine.

The ad was paid for by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, an anti-vaccine group founded last month by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch, known for inventing the optical mouse, and more recently for advocating unproven Covid cures and against vaccines, which he calls “toxic.”

Burgert warned these tactics could be effective.

“They’re going to get their claws into a new group of hesitant families that otherwise have got all of their vaccines on time,” she said. “I’m concerned that they’re going to be able to use their manipulation tactics and psychological tactics to harness a new group of formerly pro-vaccine families into vaccine hesitancy.”

In a statement, the girl’s mother, Stephanie de Garay, said her entire family was “pro-vaccine” and that ads like the one featuring her daughter were necessary to “develop treatments for these harms.”

“It is unfortunate that ‘pro-vaccine advocates’ feel the need to dismiss those injured by vaccines in order to promote vaccines,” she said in an email.

www.nbcnews.com...

We need to follow-up with the findings of the judge in the court case to see if the harm was actually caused by the vaccine.

I don't think so. There's been 1000s of threads of evidence on ATS alone. 1500+ studies, Nobel prize winners, most published doctors, top statisticians, whistle blowers, a former VP of Pfizer, whistle blower from WHO, nurses, doctors from every field, under takers, the guy who was the VP of eco health alliance, the world expert on patents. There's way more than enough evidence already and has been for over a year.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
What was done to push this through is inexcusable.

Inexcusable is one of the words that can be used in these cases. What about what Dr Anastasia Loupis said i.e that this is the biggest scandal in medical history. I think that is more appropriate.

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The comment made by the Dr Loupis was in relation to the 12 year old (at that time)Maddie de Garay who was a volunteer in a Covid-19 vaccine study by Pfizer

Wait what!? This mother subjected her daughter to be a Guinea Pig for big Pharma?!?!

The mom should be the one in the wheelchair for what she did.

Poor little girl.

I won't put it this way as she didn't obviously want her child to go through this. She was also fooled and was naive to think that blind experiments like this one are completely safe or safe in general. No parent should have to go through this.

originally posted by: Phoenix
Hiding adverse reactions in testing should be grounds for loss of indemnity as it removed informed consent - the company needs to be run out of business and executives need be jailed.

I agree with you in everything you said.

One more comment. Pfizer is not new when it comes to scandals, fraud, and deception.

a reply to: Asmodeus3
I submit criminal charges are appropriate.

originally posted by: Phoenix
Hiding adverse reactions in testing should be grounds for loss of indemnity as it removed informed consent - the company needs to be run out of business and executives need be jailed.

This company has been the subject of several lawsuits and has paid billions of dollars in criminal fines for all sort of offences they have committed. Fraud, deception, falsification of data, or harming people with their products.

The company must be dismantled and there is no doubt about this.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The mother of the injured girl wants treatments for these types of harms. Nobody is saying the vaccines do not cause severe adverse reactions, only that they don't cause these severe adverse reactions in the high numbers you want us to believe.

The mother of the girl and the group behind the ad have not provided any evidence that the girl was diagnosed as harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine.

The ad was paid for by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, an anti-vaccine group founded last month by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch, known for inventing the optical mouse, and more recently for advocating unproven Covid cures and against vaccines, which he calls “toxic.”

Burgert warned these tactics could be effective.

“They’re going to get their claws into a new group of hesitant families that otherwise have got all of their vaccines on time,” she said. “I’m concerned that they’re going to be able to use their manipulation tactics and psychological tactics to harness a new group of formerly pro-vaccine families into vaccine hesitancy.”

In a statement, the girl’s mother, Stephanie de Garay, said her entire family was “pro-vaccine” and that ads like the one featuring her daughter were necessary to “develop treatments for these harms.”

“It is unfortunate that ‘pro-vaccine advocates’ feel the need to dismiss those injured by vaccines in order to promote vaccines,” she said in an email.

www.nbcnews.com...

We need to follow-up with the findings of the judge in the court case to see if the harm was actually caused by the vaccine.

I don't think so. There's been 1000s of threads of evidence on ATS alone. 1500+ studies, Nobel prize winners, most published doctors, top statisticians, whistle blowers, a former VP of Pfizer, whistle blower from WHO, nurses, doctors from every field, under takers, the guy who was the VP of eco health alliance, the world expert on patents. There's way more than enough evidence already and has been for over a year.

Well if harm can be proved then they deserve to be compensated and the company dismantled. Is there even a court case pending, I can't find one? In fact all that is out there is vaccine hesitancy people and groups using this poor girl as their poster child in their posts.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Asmodeus3

The mother of the injured girl wants treatments for these types of harms. Nobody is saying the vaccines do not cause severe adverse reactions, only that they don't cause these severe adverse reactions in the high numbers you want us to believe.

The mother of the girl and the group behind the ad have not provided any evidence that the girl was diagnosed as harmed by a Covid-19 vaccine.

The ad was paid for by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, an anti-vaccine group founded last month by veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Kirsch, known for inventing the optical mouse, and more recently for advocating unproven Covid cures and against vaccines, which he calls “toxic.”

Burgert warned these tactics could be effective.

“They’re going to get their claws into a new group of hesitant families that otherwise have got all of their vaccines on time,” she said. “I’m concerned that they’re going to be able to use their manipulation tactics and psychological tactics to harness a new group of formerly pro-vaccine families into vaccine hesitancy.”

In a statement, the girl’s mother, Stephanie de Garay, said her entire family was “pro-vaccine” and that ads like the one featuring her daughter were necessary to “develop treatments for these harms.”

“It is unfortunate that ‘pro-vaccine advocates’ feel the need to dismiss those injured by vaccines in order to promote vaccines,” she said in an email.

www.nbcnews.com...

We need to follow-up with the findings of the judge in the court case to see if the harm was actually caused by the vaccine.

I don't think so. There's been 1000s of threads of evidence on ATS alone. 1500+ studies, Nobel prize winners, most published doctors, top statisticians, whistle blowers, a former VP of Pfizer, whistle blower from WHO, nurses, doctors from every field, under takers, the guy who was the VP of eco health alliance, the world expert on patents. There's way more than enough evidence already and has been for over a year.

Well if harm can be proved then they deserve to be compensated and the company dismantled. Is there even a court case pending, I can't find one? In fact all that is out there is vaccine hesitancy people and groups using this poor girl as their poster child in their posts.

Harm has been proved on many other occasions where coroners or medical examiners have been involved and autopsies performed. If autopsies are allowed to go ahead and if the coroners or medical examiners are willing to do their job properly

Here is one such case

ground.news...

Autopsy Reveals Healthy 36-Year-Old Mother Died from First Dose of Covid Pfizer Vaccine
Summary by Ground News

Dawn Wooldridge received her first dose of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine last June 4. After eleven days following her vaccination, she died unexpectedly. An inquest heard that the unexpected death was likely caused as a result of the vaccination. Dr Sukhvinder Ghataura told the coroner: 'It is more than likely Dawn died in response to the Covid jab' Her husband Ashley was visibly shocked in the coroner's room.

So should Pfizer be dismantled? As you said above.

What vaccine hesitancy are you talking about?? Are you living in a different universe??

The Mother of this poor kid, allowed her 3 children to participate in these trials for financial gain ! The other 2 kid’s apparently received the placebo and have since rejected taking the actual jab. I’d imagine this mother feels a lot of guilt and perhaps she’s not actually able to admit that what happened to her child was totally unnecessary because there was NEVER a benefit to society, especially children, to develop these bio weapons and yeah, that’s what it looks like we’re dealing with !

a reply to: quintessentone

And another one here. This time a 68 year old died due to the Moderna vaccine.

www.dailymail.co.uk...

A 68-year-old Kansas woman who died after receiving the Moderna COVID vaccine suffered an allergic reaction to the shot which caused her airway to close, her autopsy has revealed - but she also had a history of hypertension and an allergic reaction disorder which was triggered by other medicines in the past

Now, an autopsy obtained by The Topeka Capital Journal has revealed that she had an allergic reaction to the vaccine which caused her airway to close.

Evans' family say they intend to file a lawsuit against Moderna for wrongful death