TREASON! Rep. Waltz Says DOD Told Him China Spy Balloons Crossed US During Trump Years But Gen. Matt

Rep. Waltz said that General Mattis was Secretary of Defense at the time and decided not to inform President Trump because the Pentagon thought Trump was “too provocative and aggressive!” This is a treason if true. Mattis put the US in danger, offered comfort to the enemy, allowed Chinese spying on US installations, and then hid this from his superiors, including the President of the United States. House Republicans MUST call on General Mattis to immediately testify under oath! This is also quite a statement if true since President Trump is the first US president in over 40 years NOT to start a war!

Rep. Mike Waltz (R-FL): My office has been briefed by the office of the Secretary of Defense of the current Pentagon that it happened over Florida, it happened over Texas, and that it’s happened before. We have more detailed questions but what is unclear, Stuart, at this point is, did the Pentagon under the Trump Administration brief the Trump White House and give them the option to take action or did they decide not to brief them for whatever reason? And there is some speculation, I talked to Trump administration officials over the weekend, that the Pentagon deliberately did it because they thought Trump would be too provocative and too aggressive. So that’s what we need to get to the bottom of and one person that I’m waiting to hear from that we haven’t heard from that list is former Secretary of Defense, General Mattis who was the secretary during this time period. What did he know and what did he decide to pass on and brief to the president.

Either the current Pentagon is lying or the former Pentagon officials were treasonous bastards. Americans deserve the truth.

TREASON! Rep. Waltz Says DOD Told Him China Spy Balloons Crossed US During Trump Years But Gen. Mattis DID NOT TELL TRUMP – Thought He Was Too Aggressive

General Mattis didn’t tell President Trump about Chinese spy balloons when he was Secretary of Defense. And, Gen. Milley *called his Chinese handlers* behind Trump’s back and promised we wouldn’t attack them. General Mattis admits he didn’t tell the President Trump, who IS the Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces, about Chinese spy balloons, thinking President Trump was “too provocative.” Mattis and Milly have been, “giving aid to the enemy”
This is Treason!
Now, America has to find out how many of our senior military leaders, and elected officials have been/are compromised by Communist China!
The Deep State took out Gen. Flynn because, he has the highest of integrity. Gen Flynn would have been assigned to the NSA. He would have found out about all of these traitors, and would have had them all arrested.
He wasn’t compromised by China like Gen.Milley or Gen. Mattis.

Currently, America cannot trust anyone to represent us in DC that *isn’t* attacked by the Deep State.

I mean, little things like laws don't really exist anymore in the two tier justice system. So...

a reply to: Violater1

If true this is treason. I doubt anything will come of it though as DC no longer does the right thing, only what is politically expedient.

🤬🤬🤬

Where does Waltz say anything about Mattis knowing? He said that it needs to be determined that Mattis knew. Considering the existence of these other balloons weren't discovered until after the Trump administration was out of office, I'm going to guess he knew nothing about them.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Where does Waltz say anything about Mattis knowing? He said that it needs to be determined that Mattis knew. Considering the existence of these other balloons weren't discovered until after the Trump administration was out of office, I'm going to guess he knew nothing about them.

If it comes out that Mattis did know, but kept it from Trump, would you consider it treason?

a reply to: SourGrapes

No. The definition of treason as established in the Constitution requires the US to be in a state of war. Even seditious conspiracy doesn't quite fit. He could probably be charged under 18 USC § 2387. Activities affecting armed forces generally, which is a maximum jail sentence of 10 years.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Where does Waltz say anything about Mattis knowing? He said that it needs to be determined that Mattis knew. Considering the existence of these other balloons weren't discovered until after the Trump administration was out of office, I'm going to guess he knew nothing about them.

If true, someone had to know about them at the time it happened.
Otherwise, it’s safe to say that nobody would know about it now.
If it really happened, someone withheld the info from the Commander in Chief.
That’s treason and if it’s not treason, it’s still against the law.

originally posted by: SourGrapes

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Where does Waltz say anything about Mattis knowing? He said that it needs to be determined that Mattis knew. Considering the existence of these other balloons weren't discovered until after the Trump administration was out of office, I'm going to guess he knew nothing about them.

If it comes out that Mattis did know, but kept it from Trump, would you consider it treason?

The honest answer would be of course as long as it stains OMB, somehow some way, right

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: SourGrapes

No. The definition of treason as established in the Constitution requires the US to be in a state of war. Even seditious conspiracy doesn't quite fit. He could probably be charged under 18 USC § 2387. Activities affecting armed forces generally, which is a maximum jail sentence of 10 years.

You will go to any number of mental gymnastics to excuse the negative behavior of anyone who dislikes Trump. 👎🏻

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: SourGrapes

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Where does Waltz say anything about Mattis knowing? He said that it needs to be determined that Mattis knew. Considering the existence of these other balloons weren't discovered until after the Trump administration was out of office, I'm going to guess he knew nothing about them.

If it comes out that Mattis did know, but kept it from Trump, would you consider it treason?

[snipped]

Wrong again.

As a very minimum it couldn't be treason because in the US an act of treason requires that we be in a state of war, and we're not at war with China.

(ETA: I see someone beat me to it.)

I've suspected since day one all of the agency heads under Trump that were supposed to keep him briefed on all current events deliberately chose to withhold information to make sure he looked like an ineffective POTUS and keep the 'game plan' on track as much as possible.

For 8 years true patriots in key military and government positions were fired and replaced with 'woke' players who favor communism and socialism.

We didn't get here overnight; it's been a long journey, made easy by people who refuse to look at all of the facts without bias, from an intellectual view. Most seem to live life from an emotional center, fed by MSM/gov propaganda leading us to THIER end goal.

Some of us are kicking and screaming as we're being forced closer and closer to the cliff's edge every day. Darn lemmings....

a reply to: Creep Thumper

Where did I excuse negative behavior? I pointed out the exact law he could be charged with.

Does anyone really believe that Chinese spy balloons were in
over the U.S. and The Pentagon didn't know?

It would seem that they just chose to hide it from The Commander
in Chief. How many other things did they hide, lie or manipulate?

And some people on the left still try and defend this? BAMN!

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: SourGrapes

No. The definition of treason as established in the Constitution requires the US to be in a state of war. Even seditious conspiracy doesn't quite fit. He could probably be charged under 18 USC § 2387. Activities affecting armed forces generally, which is a maximum jail sentence of 10 years.

09/22/2021. President Biden declared to the United Nations on Tuesday that “for the first time in 20 years, the United States is not at war. We’ve turned the page.”
President Biden's assertion that the 20 years of war is over, is inclusive of the times of when Milley and Mathis (and many others), committed treason. If you disagree, then either you are calling the POTUS a liar, or refuse to believe in the truth.
ATS: Deny Ignorance.

www.nytimes.com...

originally posted by: nugget1
I've suspected since day one all of the agency heads under Trump that were supposed to keep him briefed on all current events deliberately chose to withhold information to make sure he looked like an ineffective POTUS and keep the 'game plan' on track as much as possible.

For 8 years true patriots in key military and government positions were fired and replaced with 'woke' players who favor communism and socialism.

We didn't get here overnight; it's been a long journey, made easy by people who refuse to look at all of the facts without bias, from an intellectual view. Most seem to live life from an emotional center, fed by MSM/gov propaganda leading us to THIER end goal.

Some of us are kicking and screaming as we're being forced closer and closer to the cliff's edge every day. Darn lemmings....

If high level officials withheld information from Trump it might be because he had a habit of inviting Russian intelligence officials into the White House and sharing sensitive information with them and also of publicly saying he trusts Putin over his own intelligence agencies.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: SourGrapes

No. The definition of treason as established in the Constitution requires the US to be in a state of war. Even seditious conspiracy doesn't quite fit. He could probably be charged under 18 USC § 2387. Activities affecting armed forces generally, which is a maximum jail sentence of 10 years.

Where does it say it requires the USA to be in a state of war to be convicted of treason?
It doesn’t.

2381. Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

a reply to: Violater1

The US has not been in an official state of war since World War II. It takes an act of Congress for war to be declared.

originally posted by: 1947boomer

If high level officials withheld information from Trump it might be because he had a habit of inviting Russian intelligence officials into the White House and sharing sensitive information with them and also of publicly saying he trusts Putin over his own intelligence agencies.

Where did you get your info from, Adam Schiff?
Indicted FBI head Charles McGonigal?

This is just another leap of logic lefties make because TDS.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: SourGrapes

No. The definition of treason as established in the Constitution requires the US to be in a state of war. Even seditious conspiracy doesn't quite fit. He could probably be charged under 18 USC § 2387. Activities affecting armed forces generally, which is a maximum jail sentence of 10 years.

WRONG.
AGAIN.


From the U.S. Government website:
www.govinfo.gov...


In case you can't read it.
§ 2381. Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be im- prisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.