It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: Sparkymedic
Not sure how many times it needs to be said before people stop spreading fake news. The actual DEFCON status is classified. It isn't on a freaking website or youtube channel.
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: Sparkymedic
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: Ilikesecrets
This could explain why the USA went to Defcon 2 earlier this evening? Weird times.
Does the US have a history of heightening the defense condition because of an earthquake in Turkey
I suspect this might have been done as Incirlik Air Base is pretty much right beside the fault line. It is a major NATO air base for the region and also is home to US tactical nuclear weapons. Would not surprise me if this is the reason for DEFCON 2 as the weapons safety could be compromised. Info I see puts DEFCON 2 around 20 hours ago. Seems to be in time line with quakes.
what info would that be? Are you connected with the military or got links Id like to read about that.
Just quick searches and some info matching here and there over the past 20 hours or so. Main info here
DEFCON levels
It could be true, but other ATS members have mentioned it's unlikely this information would be freely available on the internet, as it's classified.
Not to mention Turkey and NATO were squabbling just days before. Search
"is NATO using Turkey airbases for Ukraine?"
multiple articles
originally posted by: angelchemuel
a reply to: putnam6
Sorry to maybe sounding pedantic, at this point I don't give a FF what the Sec-Gen of UN thinks and what the hell does his comment have to do with the unfolding tragedy which is far from over. They are ALL people, period.
Sorry,
Rainbows
Jane
PS now 1,541 in Turkey. It's climbing by the 100 per hour
originally posted by: Kenzo
Still doing it...5.5 just 10-15 minuts ago
This is creepy, when it will settle down ?
I dont remember other earthquake even like this, that keep on going all day ...
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Kenzo
Still doing it...5.5 just 10-15 minuts ago
This is creepy, when it will settle down ?
I dont remember other earthquake even like this, that keep on going all day ...
Earthquake swarms are known to sometimes last for days.
Aftershocks
Numerous smaller earthquakes called aftershocks occur after every moderate or large earthquake. In general, the largest of these events is about one magnitude unit smaller than the mainshock, although there are exceptions. For example, the Whittier Narrows earthquake of October 1, 1987 was magnitude 5.9, but a magnitude 5.5 aftershock occurred three days later. There are two other rules of thumb about aftershocks. First, as the events get smaller, they become more numerous. Within ten days after the Loma Prieta mainshock, there were two after-shocks of magnitude 5.0 and larger, 20 of magnitude 4.0 and larger, and 79 of magnitude 3.0 and larger as of October 27, 1989. The second rule of thumb is that as time goes by after the mainshock, the frequency of aftershocks tends to decrease proportional to one divided by time (1/ time). For example, if there are 100 aftershocks the first day, there will be about 50 the second day (1/2), 10 the tenth day (1/10), and so on. The number of aftershocks and their magnitudes after the Loma Prieta earthquake are roughly typical for earthquakes in California. Based on statistical studies of average California aftershock sequences, the USGS estimated that there was a 12 percent chance of an aftershock of magnitude 6 or greater in the two months following October 21, 1989. Significant aftershocks of the Loma Prieta earthquake are listed in Table 3.
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Kenzo
Still doing it...5.5 just 10-15 minuts ago
This is creepy, when it will settle down ?
I dont remember other earthquake even like this, that keep on going all day ...
Earthquake swarms are known to sometimes last for days.
yes they do
but the magnitudes seem high for even earthquake swarms, well atleast the areas I watch. I have alerts set for Yellowstone and they have EQ swarms all the time but they are 2-3 sometimes 4s. Be hard-pressed to find an area rocking 17 5.0 plus earthquakes in. 24 hours.
Hell, I don't think even Fukushima shook that much for that long.
cool thing is it's all researchable, I'll check it out when I get a chance, LOL now I curious
originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: putnam6
A lot ....do they have idea what tectonic plate is creating this ? Or are all 3 together crashing together , Eurasian , African , Arabian ......
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Kenzo
Still doing it...5.5 just 10-15 minuts ago
This is creepy, when it will settle down ?
I dont remember other earthquake even like this, that keep on going all day ...
Earthquake swarms are known to sometimes last for days.
yes they do
but the magnitudes seem high for even earthquake swarms, well atleast the areas I watch. I have alerts set for Yellowstone and they have EQ swarms all the time but they are 2-3 sometimes 4s. Be hard-pressed to find an area rocking 17 5.0 plus earthquakes in. 24 hours.
Hell, I don't think even Fukushima shook that much for that long.
cool thing is it's all researchable, I'll check it out when I get a chance, LOL now I curious
I'm not expert but it's no surprise to me that the earthquake activity you see from a supervolcano is different from this.
There is no precise definition of when a mainshock-aftershock sequence becomes a swarm. In reality, the distinction is not sharp. Earthquake sequences follow a whole range of behaviors from "very mainshock-aftershock" to "very unlike mainshock-aftershock." The "swarm" designation is typically applied when we observe relatively many earthquakes within a relatively small area, which just don't fit the pattern of a mainshock-aftershock sequence.
Now for the second, more important question: What, physically, causes seismic sequences to behave as swarms rather than mainshock-aftershock sequences? This question is still a subject of active research, both at Yellowstone and elsewhere, as it gets to the heart of our goal of understanding active processes deep in the subsurface. Based on past research, we understand that swarms probably indicate that an extra "ingredient" is involved where the earthquakes are happening—an ingredient that isn't as prevalent in mainshock aftershock sequences. Sometimes this ingredient might be that a fault is slipping slowly, and small sticky patches are popping off and generating numerous small earthquakes. Sometimes, magma might be pushing up into the crust, opening up a pathway for itself by breaking the rock in front of it. But most often, swarms are probably caused by fluids (dominantly water) interacting with faults.