It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: offensive
Shouldn't the FDA have a complete understanding of any drug before they approve it?
Especially one thats going into billions of arms? How is that ok with ANYONE left right or middle?
Whats the point of even having an FDA if they dont understand the ###$ they approve?
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: offensive
No, they just give approvals based on the trials.
Just like any other gov agency, they don't have complete understanding, they just know that the companies seeking approval have met the requirements.
Why are people just now realizing this is how things work?
originally posted by: offensive
So then it has nothing to do with all the Former Pfizer execs on the FDA. Ok then
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: MaxxAction
I did some looking into this and can't find a single source outside of stupid "Rumble".
I am going to call BS most likely but I am leaving here in an hour to meet with a person that actually will know if that is true.
I doubt it but hey I will ask.
mRNA acts as a cellular messenger. DNA, which is stored in a cell’s nucleus, encodes the genetic information for making proteins. mRNA transfers a copy of this genetic information outside of the nucleus, to a cell’s cytoplasm, where it is translated into amino acids by ribosomes and then folded into complete proteins. mRNA is a short-lived molecule, meaning it degrades easily and does not last long inside cells.
By injecting cells with a synthetic mRNA that encodes a viral spike protein, an mRNA vaccine can direct human cells to make a viral spike protein and evoke an immune response without a person ever having been exposed to the viral material.
These viral spike proteins, or antigens, normally coat the surface of the virus and are recognized by antibodies and other immune cells that prepare and protect the body against the virus. If a person is later exposed to the virus, antibodies and other parts of the immune system can recognize and attack the virus before it can infect healthy cells or cause illness.
originally posted by: MaxxAction
Or were willing to hire the right people, or pay off enough of oversight to get it to market.
How many commercials a day go something like this:" If you or a loved one ended up injured or dead because you used #all, you may be entitled to compensation."
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: MaxxAction
I did some looking into this and can't find a single source outside of stupid "Rumble".
I am going to call BS most likely but I am leaving here in an hour to meet with a person that actually will know if that is true.
I doubt it but hey I will ask.
originally posted by: watchitburn
I don't understand how the millions of people who were lied to, tricked, and forced to be medical test monkeys aren't pulling out their torches and pitchforks yet.
originally posted by: MaxxAction
FFS...
rumble.com...
"we don't have a complete understanding of the nature of the way that the vaccine works as it pertains to producing an immune response."
Well that's reassuring. Why in the hell are you still recommending people take it if you don't know what it's doing in the body, or how it creates an immune response you brain dead idiot? I am convinced that we have now achieved full retard status. Those who are supposed to clear products for, and oversee public safety don't understand how it works. Brilliant.
MaxxAction
FDA admits that they haven't a clue what the "vaccines" are doing or how they work
originally posted by: watchitburn
I don't understand how the millions of people who were lied to, tricked, and forced to be medical test monkeys aren't pulling out their torches and pitchforks yet.