It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

It' s here! 2022 Annual Report On Unidentified Aerial Phenomena

page: 2
9
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 08:56 AM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

I suppose, on the U.S. side……the same could be said for the Cash-Landrum Incident.


1985 HBO documentary, "UFOs: What's Going On", Cash claimed she was treated for cancer after being exposed to the "radioactive UFO". The Landrums' health was somewhat better, though reportedly both suffered from lingering weakness, skin sores and hair loss. Cash later developed breast cancer and Landrum severe cataracts.[6][unreliable source?] A radiologist who examined the witnesses' medical records for MUFON wrote, "We have strong evidence that these patients have suffered secondary damage to ionizing radiation. It is also possible that there was an infrared component as well." (quoted in Clark, 176) However, Brad Sparks contends that, although the symptoms were somewhat similar to those caused by ionizing radiation, the rapidity of onset was only consistent with a massive dose that would have meant certain death in a few days. Since all of the victims lived for years after the incident, Sparks suggests the cause of the symptoms was some kind of chemical contamination, presumably by an aerosol.


An Observation here…..Burroughs too, lived and continues to live for years after the incident.

Imo ….radiation is a strange beast…..it sometimes and randomly affects people in different ways.
👽

edit on 13-1-2023 by Ophiuchus1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 09:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1




What a nothing burger….sheeesh


I wouldn't waste time even reading this report. We know NOTHING is going to be in it.



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 09:31 AM
link   
It's no doubt the US military, and justifiably so, does and will seek ufo crashes to obtain a military application to the advanced technology they think is there. I don’t blame them. What if the Chinese or Russians stumble on that technology?

The example of the WWII era Manhattan project that produced the atomic bomb will always be there as an example for the US to stay ahead of the technology game.

It turns out the Germans were nowhere near getting an atomic bomb, but we didn’t know that at the time.



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 09:49 AM
link   
One more thing. This report, in a nutshell, says what they always said publicly, except the lies and distortions of particular ufo incidents when they blatantly lied to the public about what caused this or that ufo: swamp gas, venus, flares, or in the case of the Hudson Valley--- military plane formations caused those many sightings by hundreds of people--the Philip Class type lies from the air force and FAA, for instance, are well known.

At least this new attitude might stop that kind of obfuscation from the government.



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 10:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: mirageman

So are these claims spurious? Were they ignored for the sake of the report? Or is there more to all of this.

I appreciate this is only a tiny part of the report. But it's an important one. Part of UFO lore is detecting 'radiation' in the vicinity of strange craft. And here we have a prime example.



(quote snippet)

Right.
I've been collecting and analyzing heaps of high-strangeness and UAP encounters, all of which feature adverse physical after-effects comparable to those brought on by microwave radiation and the like. There are quite a few them, and most of them share other unexpected common elements, perhaps too many common elements to be purely coincidental. Are each and every one of these witnesses blowing smoke or exaggerating? Some may be, but all of them?

One more thing to note is the verbiage used in this part of the report. They used the words "confirmed to contribute directly to adverse health-related effects". They won't "confirm" direct injuries, that is no surprise. "Directly" leaves "legal headroom" for indirect injuries as well, for example, the reported object itself did not cause the injury, but certain equipment installed on the object or used in conjunction with the object, or even used the vicinity of the sighting may have caused the injuries.



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 10:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
What a nothing burger….sheeesh

The government ain’t giving up squat.

👽

That's exactly what I thought, just a bunch of words.



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 11:05 AM
link   
DefenseScoop.com Journalist Brandi Vincent asks questions at the January 12, 2023, Pentagon press briefing.

Here is that exchange.
2022 UAP Report Released Today - Pentagon Addresses During Briefing



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 11:12 AM
link   
a reply to: imitator

What’s devoid in this report are any metrics dealing with Civilian reports.

It’s all Military…..and always will be such.

👽



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: wavelength




I've been collecting and analyzing heaps of high-strangeness and UAP encounters, all of which feature adverse physical after-effects comparable to those brought on by microwave radiation and the like.


You make a very good point in emphasizing the dangerousness reported by contact with ufos.

I tell people, if you see a strange craft, don’t go near it. Please don’t run to it like kumbaya, hey aliens. Hi, hello. Greetings. Hell no…you run the other way...and fast.

You might end up radiated or really f___ up. There is evidence of people dying from contact with these things and certainly evidence of serious health problems for people getting close to them.

Whatever they are, there is evidence they are inimical to human contact.

Of course, unless you are abducted, they seem to turn off the shields until they throw your ass back whence you came.



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: imitator

What’s devoid in this report are any metrics dealing with Civilian reports.

It’s all Military…..and always will be such.

👽


That’s interesting. That TTSAs agenda was ONLY military-based ufo incidents.

That may tell us something about their real agenda.

Military ufo incidents have been historically numerous.
Maybe they have risen to dangerous levels recently, i.e., the advent of TTSA to rile up congress and pay attention to this new level of the military being harassed by ufos.

We never consider the possibility, or don’t think much of it, that these ufos have indeed harassed the military in the US and worldwide.



edit on 13-1-2023 by peaceinoutz because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Cash-Landrum happened days after the Rendlesham Incident. That one sounds suspiciously like a test flight gone bad.

Burroughs himself never saw anything more than lights. His case was based purely around a comment in the UK Condign Report. “Non-Ionizing EM Effects on Humans” where it claims combinations of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiations from UFO/UAPs are capable – if being exposed at within certain distances and various frequencies, of damaging human tissues, and even affect human minds!!! With a specific but ambiguous statement referring to Rendlesham.



“The well-reported Rendlesham Forest/Bentwaters is an example where it might be postulated that several observers were probably exposed to UAP radiation for longer than normal UAP sightings period.”


The Condign report concluded that UAPs were a strange but natural plasma formation. Something Burroughs believes was being weaponized and tested in the area of Suffolk where he was assigned as an airman.

There were a lot of shenanigans involved in his legal case and Burroughs medical records appear to be classified to this day. I'd say someone doesn't want any of this to get out.



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 03:32 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 13 2023 @ 04:52 PM
link   
isn't
Rendlesham Forest/Bentwaters
the site of nuclear weapon storage?

maybe the uap
was there to check it out like the silos in kansas or nebraska, where ever.

the thing that struck me was them shutting down all the 20+ witnesses like they were trying to hide something.









posted on Jan, 14 2023 @ 12:40 PM
link   
Pentagon report reveals over 500 new UFO sightings — and experts have no explanation for 171 of them

link< br />


In the absence of being able to resolve what something is, we assume that it may be hostile," DOD official warns

Since August 2021, U.S. intelligence agencies have collected more than 500 new accounts of unidentified aerial phenomena, according to the latest report from the Pentagon. An increase in surveillance drones and weather balloons accounts for the majority of the reported UFO sightings — but 171 witness reports remain a mystery to officials. Meanwhile, a new amendment in the latest Defense budget aims to answer renewed calls for an investigation of UFO-related incidents surrounding the 1945 Trinity nuclear test site.



That's almost half. 171 of 500.

1945 Trinity nuclear test site?

Why that one?



posted on Jan, 14 2023 @ 01:18 PM
link   
a reply to: peaceinoutz

Because one of the key pieces is to be able to date the remains of what alien debris you would have recovered, for which you need ideal cases that predate the first atomic bomb.

And you need this to be the case because nuclear detonations produce Cesium 132, which is not a natural element in your atmosphere, so its absence allows you to know, in addition, where the remains you have recovered came from.

That's why.



posted on Jan, 14 2023 @ 02:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Direne

Sounds reasonable.
Then they should have information on this themselves.

I vaguely recall reading somewhere--I'll try to track it down ( maybe in Valle's book) that these were Japanese who those kids saw dead in that craft.



posted on Jan, 14 2023 @ 11:17 PM
link   
I think this sums it up rather nicely:

From Holman W. Jenkins Jr, of the Wall Street Journal - who's been following this report (and delays of the report) for some time. A spot-on synopsis:

Never Mind, Say the U.S. Government’s UFO Hunters

A whole lot of not-much-at'all...



posted on Jan, 15 2023 @ 09:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Outrageo

Would like to read entire article ……but the WSJ …,requires membership from what I could see.

Perhaps you could copy and paste pertinent paragraphs in a post to this thread?

👽
edit on 15-1-2023 by Ophiuchus1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 15 2023 @ 11:21 AM
link   
Two odd statements from this WSJ op-ed.




But the truth is out there: If 100% of explained events don’t involve aliens, what is the assumed rate of alien involvement in the unexplained events? If thousands of incidents are examined over decades and none yield proof of alien visitation, what should we assume about the background incidence of alien visitation?


This one distorts the stats, saying 100 percent of anything doesn’t explain ufos. 34 percent or 171 of the 500 were unexplained--- that is a huge rate of unknowns! What Blue Book was like 15 percent?



One puzzle remains: why the U.S. government for so long seemed pleased by its role in propagating the UFO frenzy, before turning on a dime a year ago—a shift paralleled by the overnight shift from credulous to skeptical of its chief stenographer, the New York Times.


The second is definitely distortion or an example of the writer's ignorance.

The US government DID NOT propagate a ufo frenzy. It tried to suppress it( Robertson Panel and all the years of lies by the Air force and other gov. agencies) and spread disinformation when it couldn’t suppress the Ufo " frenzy."

One can indeed say now, because of the government op TTSA, they are, likley for nefarious reasons, spreading a ufo frenzy.



posted on Jan, 15 2023 @ 12:04 PM
link   
Well now I know your not part of the military you stated that yourself or else they would have no reason to come to you because you would already be there.

And now I also know your ego is incredibly fragile. Unable to handle but one single heckling…online no less.

Abstain away.

a reply to: Archivalist


edit on 15-1-2023 by Athetos because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
9
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join