It' s here! 2022 Annual Report On Unidentified Aerial Phenomena

Delayed but just came out a few minutes ago. Haven't been able to get into it yet (working) but here's a link:

www.dni.gov...

a reply to: vlawde

Interesting item.

Page 8, subsection h. 2. K.


(K) An update on efforts underway on the ability to capture or exploit discovered unidentified aerial phenomena.


They want to catch one?

a reply to: Archivalist

They do. Not unlike back in WWII when the US militaries captured Luftwaffe aircraft to poke and prod at the enemy technology (and vice versa).
If the unidentified object possesses technology greater than that possessed by the military, the military would aim to capture and reverse engineer it to advance their capabilities.
The government wants to find every single thing they can possibly weaponize, from psychotronics to bioweapons to advanced transmedium vessels. Barbaric, yes, but that's their game. Well, what I'm saying is, they definitely don't want to capture UAPs just to go joyriding over their old high school stadiums.

To defense, anything unidentified demonstrating advanced capabilities is a potential threat (doesn't matter if it's Russians, Chinese, or ET), this is why they're encouraging reporting. The more eyes on the sky, the better their chances are of staying ahead of the game.

originally posted by: wavelength
a reply to: Archivalist

They do. Not unlike back in WWII when the US militaries captured Luftwaffe aircraft to poke and prod at the enemy technology (and vice versa).
If the unidentified object possesses technology greater than that possessed by the military, the military would aim to capture and reverse engineer it to advance their capabilities.
The government wants to find every single thing they can possibly weaponize, from psychotronics to bioweapons to advanced transmedium vessels. Barbaric, yes, but that's their game. Well, what I'm saying is, they definitely don't want to capture UAPs just to go joyriding over their old high school stadiums.

To defense, anything unidentified demonstrating advanced capabilities is a potential threat (doesn't matter if it's Russians, Chinese, or ET), this is why they're encouraging reporting. The more eyes on the sky, the better their chances are of staying ahead of the game.

Well, I have a little theory about how they could capture one of the UAP that is potentially cancelling inertia, and operating independent of friction. Although, I won't post those details here. If they want that info, they have to come to me. As far as what I know about the current US military tech, they don't have what they need to do that, on-hand, but the necessary system to capture one of those UAP is capable of being built, if they actually knew what they needed to build to do it. It could be ready and capable of being armed within 12 months. (I predict that they will know, on their own, what the necessary system is, within the next 48 months, so from right now, without any help from someone like me, they are 5 years away from being able to catch a tic-tac.) With my help, any major superpower country, would be ready to do it in 18 months.

The USA isn't the only country capable of building that type of device. The whole world could be perfectly capable of building the necessary capture device by 2040 at the latest.

Any government intel or military types that read my post, I'm willing to aid the endeavor. If you're worried about an adversary capturing one of those UAP, I would just say, pay attention to whoever is buying/amassing a lot of cooling systems and materials. For more detailed information I would only discuss that in person, OTR, and under the right conditions.

(The above post is certainly a joke, haha.)

a reply to: vlawde

From the DNI website you linked…Thanks……the report PDF

2022 Annual Report on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena

Will read at some point……but it’s about time!

👽

a reply to: Archivalist

Let me guess, your secret UAP capturing device is a giant butterfly net? Baited trap with peanut butter? C'mon, inquiring minds want to know!


Oh, and I forgot in my previous post to thank vlawde for the heads up and the link to the document. I'm still going through it, been looking forward to reading it.

In summary

- Clusters of UAP around US military maybe illusory
- 45% were identified as balloons or clutter
- 7% identified as drones
- Many reports lack the detailed data to conclude on a cause
- Some reports mention objects that *seem* to exhibit unusual motion
- So far there are Zero health effects found from encountering UAP (**this has serious implications for the Rendlesham case)
- More studies are needed....


There's your UAP report. No anti-grav spaceships in Hangars at Area 51, no dead alien bodies on ice at Homestead AFB and no Americans getting abducted while they sleep.

a reply to: wavelength

The most advanced butterfly net ever built.

The necessary system to catch a tic-tac does exist in a specific form at a single public research facility.

Although, there is no way that anyone in the military with the necessary rank to make the decision is even aware that it's what they need.
Give it 24-36 months for their special committee to figure out operation Hopscotch. Then they might know what needs to be built. 12-18 months after that, they'll have a working version.

a reply to: mirageman

This is just an unclassified report. It does not have details about any specific incidents, though they certainly have that data. There is bound to be something interesting in there. We'll know in a few decades when whoever is running Black Vault 2 gets the FOIA response.

a reply to: mirageman

**this has serious implications for the Rendlesham case)

Hmmmmm. Just reading it now.

originally posted by: wavelength
a reply to: Archivalist

They do. Not unlike back in WWII when the US militaries captured Luftwaffe aircraft to poke and prod at the enemy technology (and vice versa).
If the unidentified object possesses technology greater than that possessed by the military, the military would aim to capture and reverse engineer it to advance their capabilities.
The government wants to find every single thing they can possibly weaponize, from psychotronics to bioweapons to advanced transmedium vessels. Barbaric, yes, but that's their game. Well, what I'm saying is, they definitely don't want to capture UAPs just to go joyriding over their old high school stadiums.

To defense, anything unidentified demonstrating advanced capabilities is a potential threat (doesn't matter if it's Russians, Chinese, or ET), this is why they're encouraging reporting. The more eyes on the sky, the better their chances are of staying ahead of the game.

It's so interesting that I just watched 'The Roswell Files' on our History channel the other day, it was 6 hours on Major Jesse Marcel and other military personnel who came forward to verify Marcel's claims of a crashed interplanetary vehicle. One of the military people, I don't recall the name, claimed that one of our jet fighters was actually based on technology retrieved from that crash.

originally posted by: Archivalist
a reply to: wavelength

The most advanced butterfly net ever built.

There going to have to Super Size the net systems shown here for Sea Bats……

Now there going to need the right bait



Or, how about a drone UAV netting a UAP?


👽

Considering your not part of military, how would you even know what they have or don’t have. know or don’t know.

Your speculating at best while attempting to crown yourself smartest man alive.

a reply to: Archivalist

a reply to: mirageman

There's your UAP report. No anti-grav spaceships in Hangars at Area 51, no dead alien bodies on ice at Homestead AFB and no Americans getting abducted while they sleep.

WHAT?

Do you mean to say they can’t take ET home? Dead or alive!

Of course, we know mm, if they did have anything resembling such things, they wouldn’t tell us in that report…

It would be funny, to terrifying if they did.

If they did that, would it be a horror movie or a sci-fi thriller?

Or a combination of both?

What a nothing burger….sheeesh

The AARO reports to the policymakers on a quarterly basis…..however, the general public report is a once a year report.

On on top of that….just like this report…..it’s about metric’s.

There are no inside stories on any single reported occurrence of the hundreds of occurrences reported…………how boring is that?

It was a waist of time waiting for this report.

One unclassified report per year for the general public deflates the peoples interest.

We need the White House landing, crash into populated areas, mid-air collision scenario’s to play out.

The government ain’t giving up squat.

👽

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: mirageman

**this has serious implications for the Rendlesham case)

Hmmmmm. Just reading it now.

BB…Seems to me from this sentence in the report

In addition to the 144 UAP reports covered during the 17 years of UAP reporting included in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) preliminary assessment,

they only went as far back as 17 years, implying that anything before that has not been taken into consideration. Ergo, the Rendlesham case is still in play.

👽

a reply to: Athetos

You have no idea who or what I am.

I appreciate that you read my post, but I'm going to have to abstain from further interaction with you. Thank you.

Congress- At language development phase fed via a filtering agency managed by the DoD.
The US Army- In possession of materials alleged to be manufactured, yet none terrestrial (with a CRADA to prove it).

Whilst this obviously paradoxical scenario exists in relation to "UAPs" - expect nothing from AARO/Congress.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

they only went as far back as 17 years, implying that anything before that has not been taken into consideration. Ergo, the Rendlesham case is still in play.

Yes, for sure.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

...they only went as far back as 17 years, implying that anything before that has not been taken into consideration. Ergo, the Rendlesham case is still in play.

There's probably a lot of semantics and conditions applied to what went into the UAP report.

But while the Rendlesham incident occurred in 1980, the diagnosis and VA settlement for injuries sustained were only made in the 2010s/

An American airman has won a legal bid to force military health chiefs to pay for the treatment of an illness allegedly caused by a UFO encounter in Suffolk.

Airman First Class John Burroughs was involved in an incident in Rendlesham Forest in December 1980 which has become known as "Britain's Roswell".

He was exposed to huge doses of radiation whilst investigating a mysterious craft and claimed this left him in need of "lifesaving" heart surgery.

After decades of being "stonewalled", he has finally persuaded the US Veteran's Association (VA) to pay for his treatment.
His lawyer hailed the dramatic legal about-turn as a "de facto" admission that UFOs exist and can cause "physical injury".

...Burroughs and a colleague Jim Penniston ventured from their base to inspect the UFO at close range...l

Shortly afterwards, Burroughs fell ill with symptoms resembling radiation exposure. But the real problems started in 2011, when doctors were astonished after the mithral valve of his heart had failed - something which usually happens to men much older than 50-year-old Burroughs.

"I couldn't work and was going downhill fast," he continued.

Neither Burroughs nor his doctor were able to access his medical records, which were classified. Burroughs even claimed the Air Force denied he was employed with them at the time of the UFO incident. He asked for the help of presidential candidate Senator John McCain, who was also unable to get his hands on all the medical records.

Finally, Burroughs' legal team found two documents from the British Ministry of Defence which showed high levels of radiation were detected at the site where he encountered the mystery UFO.

The US Veterans Association and Department of Defence then agreed to pay for his treatment....


Daily Mirror [3rd March 2015]

So are these claims spurious? Were they ignored for the sake of the report? Or is there more to all of this.

I appreciate this is only a tiny part of the report. But it's an important one. Part of UFO lore is detecting 'radiation' in the vicinity of strange craft. And here we have a prime example.