It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Tories urged to bar Andrew Bridgen from standing at next election after vaccine ‘Holocaust’ tweet. Backbencher has become prominent anti-vaxxer in recent months, with messages on Twitter claiming Covid jab was harmful
originally posted by: bastion
It's not suprising he's been suspended for misleading the House, multiple false claims and insulting victims of the holocaust by tryinng to claim vaccines or lockdowns were remotely like mass extinction of millions.
BHF have been one of the UK's leading bodies in phase IV side efect monitoring and have conducted some of the best research that discovered clotting and cardio risks in those with pre-existing conditions; which caused updates in vaccination sheet info and changes in medical advice to reflect the new info.
The idea they're covering stuff up is completely false and defamatory; it bares no resemblance to reality and breaks a lot of Parliamentary laws and legislation so he was rightly struck off.
Any MP making such false claims about any subject would have the whip removed and be suspended for bringing the House into disrepute.
He's already suspended for fiddling expenses and lying to Parliament for accepting bribes and not declaring financial interests - so this is just an extra offence that breaches Parliamentary rules.
The British newspapers are claiming that he is 'spreading misinformation' which is a rather common tactic and accusation when they want to censor and silence an individual. The same has been happening in the social media over the last few years.
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
The British newspapers are claiming that he is 'spreading misinformation' which is a rather common tactic and accusation when they want to censor and silence an individual. The same has been happening in the social media over the last few years.
I feel very sorry for Mr Bridgen, and for the UK more generally, because we have lost one of the only sane, honest & God-fearing voices that remained in the heart of so-called democracy in the UK.
I listened to a podcast recently which aired just before Christmas (Irreverend), in which MP Andrew Bridgen featured as a guest. I found him to be a passionate & fiery character, and although he was a bit abrasive, his heart is in the right place, and he has access to the right sort of information proving the scandal of the COVID vaccines & all associated skullduggery..
He himself claimed in that interveiw that it seemed likely that he would be suspended within a short period of time owing to the assaults against him in the press which had been increasing over the past welve months. It seems that was self-fulfilling prophecy, and I can't say I'm surprised that 'THEY' have elected to eject him from the public space in which he was able to do much damage to 'THEIR' cause against the human race.
Hail, Mr Bridgen, you did great work. Now, the task is to continue shouting even louder, in the right places, so your good work may continue to upset 'THEIR' plans for a second Holocaust. The comparison was in no way inappropriate.
Regards, FITO.
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
The British newspapers are claiming that he is 'spreading misinformation' which is a rather common tactic and accusation when they want to censor and silence an individual. The same has been happening in the social media over the last few years.
I feel very sorry for Mr Bridgen, and for the UK more generally, because we have lost one of the only sane, honest & God-fearing voices that remained in the heart of so-called democracy in the UK.
I listened to a podcast recently which aired just before Christmas (Irreverend), in which MP Andrew Bridgen featured as a guest. I found him to be a passionate & fiery character, and although he was a bit abrasive, his heart is in the right place, and he has access to the right sort of information proving the scandal of the COVID vaccines & all associated skullduggery..
He himself claimed in that interveiw that it seemed likely that he would be suspended within a short period of time owing to the assaults against him in the press which had been increasing over the past welve months. It seems that was self-fulfilling prophecy, and I can't say I'm surprised that 'THEY' have elected to eject him from the public space in which he was able to do much damage to 'THEIR' cause against the human race.
Hail, Mr Bridgen, you did great work. Now, the task is to continue shouting even louder, in the right places, so your good work may continue to upset 'THEIR' plans for a second Holocaust. The comparison was in no way inappropriate.
Regards, FITO.
Andrew Bridgen had the whip withdrawn after claiming on Twitter that a cardiologist had told him that the vaccine campaign was the “biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust”.
They can't handle reality and truth as the entire system has invested both financially and emotionally in these products. The stakes are too high.
* "Because of the signs it was given to perform on behalf of the first beast, it deceived those who dwell on the earth, telling them to make an image to the beast that had been wounded by the sword and yet had lived. The second beast was permitted to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship it to be killed. And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead."
Revelation of St John 13: 14-16
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: WraithOfEva777
He hasn't been accused for anti-semitism but was clearly targeted and has been set up. Any 'wrong' move and the establishment will try to purge him. He shared what a cardiologist told him about the vaccines.
From the opening page
Andrew Bridgen had the whip withdrawn after claiming on Twitter that a cardiologist had told him that the vaccine campaign was the “biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust”.
If I was him I round have avoided such comparisons for the obvious reasons. But there is nothing sinister about his twit. They clearly want to remove him from the UK Parliament because he is a real trouble and one of very loud 'trouble-maker'.
They have however succeeded making him even more famous then he is and all you need to do is have a look online and see the comments made on social platforms.
Also when you have the time it would be good to take a look a the latest deaths of three young and healthy officers from the Massachusetts Police Department. Probably happened in a space of a week. The comments from the members of various platforms is what gets your attention. They are all coming to the same conclusion...
originally posted by: Justoneman
Are you from another Planet?
Where did you get your talking points if not from the WHO?
Please, take the time to show us how you came to this erroneous conclusion so completely.
originally posted by: bastion
originally posted by: Justoneman
Are you from another Planet?
Where did you get your talking points if not from the WHO?
Please, take the time to show us how you came to this erroneous conclusion so completely.
I posted facts, look up him fiddling expenses from a Ghanian platation company, Parliamentary standards and how the parliamentary whip works.
They're basic parts of UK parliament
Same goes for BHF advice - look up how their monitring updated vaccination advice for people with clotting etc...
These are all very well known facts for anyone in the UK who paid attention to the subject.
originally posted by: bastion
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Hardly - you're allowed to ask questions in the House - you're not allowed to fail to declare donations, overseas trips or bring the House into disrepute by violating Parliamentary Standards by comparing things to the Holocaust or making libellous claims about people as this MP has done.
If he'd asked reasonable questions he wouldn't have been suspended - 'i.e what id being done to adress these concerns' - instead of unreasonable anti-semitism and spurious claims.
See Parliamentary Standards Act for more explanations.
Plenty of MPs are/were against lockdowns and viced them in debates; none of them were suspended from Parliament as they didn't go full retard and compare things to the holocaust.
Again; basic facts of form and function of UK parliament.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: WraithOfEva777
At this stage of the economy upsetting the mainly Jewish bankers would be stupid, that's not antisemitism it's an obvious fact. Then when these politicians get their reward on a board of directors, it will be as a nod and a wink for services rendered to their fellows providing they have not ruffled any feathers.. But since even mentioning the obvious is an afront these days, the obvious will not be mentioned even if people are dropping like flies. That's what happens when a system starts to turn down, everyone is looking after themselves. But we are all acting out our parts. Like an acting police officer, Acting Prime minister, etc, I just wish they would change the script.
originally posted by: bastion
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Half of Parliament haven't made anti-semitic remarks. Over 100 Tory Gvernment MPs opposed lockdown and spoke out against it and none of them have been reprimanded.
Boris had to leave due to misleading the House in Partygate. I've had dozens of questions raised in the House about illegal UK arms exports to Sri Lanka, Bahrain and various Middle East dictatorships plus Corporation X and the shadwy £1Tn sverieng wealth fund and neither myself or my MP have ever been reprimanded.
There's certain ethics, standards and decorum that have to be followed and fundamental protections to allow people to ask them as long as they don't make stupid comparisons or slanderous/libellous claims.
originally posted by: bastion
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Half of Parliament haven't made anti-semitic remarks. Over 100 Tory Gvernment MPs opposed lockdown and spoke out against it and none of them have been reprimanded.
Boris had to leave due to misleading the House in Partygate. I've had dozens of questions raised in the House about illegal UK arms exports to Sri Lanka, Bahrain and various Middle East dictatorships plus Corporation X and the shadwy £1Tn sverieng wealth fund and neither myself or my MP have ever been reprimanded.
There's certain ethics, standards and decorum that have to be followed and fundamental protections to allow people to ask them as long as they don't make stupid comparisons or slanderous/libellous claims.