School Groomers, Child Molesters and Rapist

originally posted by: GopiGrl
a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn

I can' help but feel that if my parents had been committed to raising a family, my siblings would not have been abused. Divorce and new relationships put them on a bad trajectory - looks selfish to me.

I consider myself very lucky. My mother and father both were realist. They did not fill our heads with fantasy, or hope without contribution.

They showed us, and taught us that you had to earn the things in life you wanted, and if someone you didn't know was giving you something for free, not to take it until you found the hidden price tag.

It was over half a century ago, back when things were a bit different, but we all fared extremely well from their parenting.

10 of us, 8 still be standing. We are all close, and we have never stopped looking out for each other. Another thing they taught us.

a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn

Yes, a stable upbringing is a blessing. It's the only thing that will heal humanity.💕

Relevant for consideration.

Trauma Based Mind Control Illuminati Bloodline Survivor Shares All... Incredibly Graphic Interview.

What these children are put through is remarkably evil.

I would like to discuss this with anyone that listens to it.

At what point will mankind make a united stand against these criminals?

Here is a link to the audio file: cdn.lbryplayer.xyz...

Here it is on YT:

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Terpene
Oh! And just FYI, teenage predators are not "pedophiles." They are "ephebophiles." Very big difference.

Astute observation, and while I think that a 40+ yr old man going after an ~18 yr old is reprehensible (and really scummy and cringeworthy), it is not even in the same universe as someone who goes after small pre-pubescent children.

I'll also point out the other biggie - a 17, 18 or 19 yr old boy getting involved with a 14-16 yr old... again, not even remotely related to pedoland, and these kids should absolutely not be branded as 'sex offenders' for life.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

... a 40+ yr old man going after an ~18 yr old is reprehensible (and really scummy and cringeworthy), it is not even in the same universe as someone who goes after small pre-pubescent children.

Yes! Thank you!!!

This isn't to minimize or excuse creepy old men preying on teenage girls, it's simply putting the crimes in their proper perspective. The mental, emotional and physical damage caused by adults physically abusing growing children is beyond compare to (usually) consensual relations between (physically) mature adults. In some cases, causing lifelong physical damage and debilitating conditions. It's horrifying.

I'll also point out the other biggie - a 17, 18 or 19 yr old boy getting involved with a 14-16 yr old... again, not even remotely related to pedoland, and these kids should absolutely not be branded as 'sex offenders' for life.

Definitely. In a reasonable and sane world, any such laws would recognize that such relations are not abuse; just young and immature youths exploring this new world post-puberty.

In fact, I'm guilty of the same. When I was 16, I had a (very respectful) 20-year-old boyfriend... with a Harley! He was the older brother of my friend's boyfriend. My parents knew him, knew his age, and liked him. We stayed together until I was well into my 20s.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: infolurker

So from 700 and some they closed 600...
Hmmm
Have you read the cases? Sounds like 99% disgruntled teens that didn't get their ways and tried the old "my teacher is a perv" route.

3 out of 4 sexual violence happens at home

But hey let's make this a sensation so no one comes looking at my home?

If anyone should get the pedo chopping block it's team bible.

Those that scream the loudest???

Ha. What's projection mean?

I click on these "pedo news du jour" threads, they're interesting and salacious. Albeit focused on the liberal offenders, but I still read them.

Same reason I read this story too.

Diocese to file bankruptcy


The local diocese is screwed. I mean they have property on land worth that much, but looks like they are going bankruptcy route.

I will say this, certain careers appeal to certain creeps. For the Catholics, the repressed homosexual could cop out with a career that makes sure no one ever question why they never got married. And they're going bankrupt for it.

Perhaps there really are a bunch of LGBT people that got into teaching specifically so they could teach kids to be gay? Or like The Scout offenders, because they wanted to be around children?

Unpleasant search trends on Porn Hub in any case. At one point the most common Lesbian sub category was Old/Young. It really kills the result of a general category search. They really do love their mature sex teacher corrupting the barely legal high school girl fantasy too. It made me wonder how many old repressed predator lesbians there are.

Let's hope those viewers aren't drawn to careers to live out that fantasy, but maybe a high number are?

a reply to: Degradation33

There were quite a few rumors about one of the basketball coaches we had when I was in high school. Let's just say she was overly fond of just happening to be around when we were showering, and everyone made it a practice not to be alone at that time.

a reply to: ketsuko

Cleary one in 4 cases the transgression doesn't happen at home.
But for every pedo teacher there are 3 creepy uncles roaming your kids savespaces.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: tanstaafl

This isn't to minimize or excuse creepy old men preying on teenage girls, it's simply putting the crimes in their proper perspective.

While I get what you mean, I wouldn't characterize creepy old men preying on 18 yr olds as a criminal act. I don't think it is a crime anywhere in these 60 united States of America. I also know that the age of consent is lower in many States, and MUCH lower in other places (if the parents consent for the child, which I am absolutely against such things).

In a reasonable and sane world, any such laws would recognize that such relations are not abuse; just young and immature youths exploring this new world post-puberty.

In fact, I'm guilty of the same. When I was 16, I had a (very respectful) 20-year-old boyfriend... with a Harley! He was the older brother of my friend's boyfriend. My parents knew him, knew his age, and liked him. We stayed together until I was well into my 20s.

Yes... it is called sane, rational people acting sanely and rationally. Another girl, another family/similar situation as yours, and the appropriate thing for the parents to do may have been right to warn the 20 yr old off - with a shotgun if necessary. It would all depend on the circumstances.

a reply to: Terpene

Then there was the art teacher who used to creep on us ... he was a piece of work. Let's face it. I was completely oblivious to advances from guys, and even *I* could tell he was being inappropriate.

The reality is that if you can gain easy access to your preferred prey, then the predators will be there. It doesn't matter what kind of institution we're talking about.

a reply to: tanstaafl

While I get what you mean, I wouldn't characterize creepy old men preying on 18 yr olds as a criminal act.

Agreed. Depending on the ages involved, I may still consider it creepy -- but not a crime. At 18, everyone is an adult, and their decisions and choices are theirs to live with.

I don't think it is a crime anywhere in these 60 united States of America.

Are we at 60 states now? Darn! I thought we were still at 57...

Yes... it is called sane, rational people acting sanely and rationally. Another girl, another family/similar situation as yours, and the appropriate thing for the parents to do may have been right to warn the 20 yr old off - with a shotgun if necessary. It would all depend on the circumstances.

Sometimes that's necessary at any age... and sometimes it's the girl/woman that needs to be warned right off... As you say, it just all depends on the circumstances.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: tanstaafl

At 18, everyone is an adult, and their decisions and choices are theirs to live with.

I gave this a lot of thought a while back when the subject of voting came up, and considering just how immature most kids are today, I'm actually in favor of raising the 'Age of Majority' (when one is considered an adult) to 21, or hell, even 25. Pf course I'm not under the delusion that there's a chance in hell of that happening.

Are we at 60 states now? Darn! I thought we were still at 57...

Hah! Hadn't had my coffee yet (just now having my first cup)...

Sometimes that's necessary at any age... and sometimes it's the girl/woman that needs to be warned right off... As you say, it just all depends on the circumstances.

Exactly! My nephew fell in with a slightly older girl when he was 15, and she (and her other friends) got him mixed up with drugs, and he ended up getting a felony conviction for B&E when he was 17, which destroyed his plans to join the military. He still hasn't fully recovered from what happened and that was almost 20 years ago. Of course, he made the decisions, but without her influence, who knows...

a reply to: ketsuko

neuter them all, I don't care about your uncle either...

a reply to: tanstaafl

I gave this a lot of thought a while back when the subject of voting came up, and considering just how immature most kids are today, I'm actually in favor of raising the 'Age of Majority' (when one is considered an adult) to 21, or hell, even 25. Pf course I'm not under the delusion that there's a chance in hell of that happening.

I cannot disagree... but it's a damn crying shame. I will preface my comment by noting that the age of majority was lowered in large part due to complaints that if 18-year-olds were old enough to march off to war then they were old enough to vote, so the age of majority was lowered for voting. Not exactly genius-level logic, but it is what it is.

Having said that, today's kids are increasingly becoming so dumbed down that they don't even realize how dumbed down they are, and it shows! But they don't want to know better. They want to think they already know it all. They want to think they are the smartest tool in the shed. I'm always quick to say that the young have the best excuse in the world, but more and more, I feel pity for these kids because they're going to learn one way or another, and probably at the school of hard knocks. (At least, I HOPE they learn!) We aren't doing them any favors by coddling and humoring them in their ignorance and arrogance.

Hah! Hadn't had my coffee yet (just now having my first cup)...

LOL! I'm glad you caught the joke... and that you got your coffee!

Exactly! My nephew fell in with a slightly older girl when he was 15, and she (and her other friends) got him mixed up with drugs, and he ended up getting a felony conviction for B&E when he was 17, which destroyed his plans to join the military. He still hasn't fully recovered from what happened and that was almost 20 years ago. Of course, he made the decisions, but without her influence, who knows...

That's rough. I'm sorry to hear that. I'm sorry he had to learn the hard way. I'm idealistic enough to hope though that it's better than not learning when he did and finding himself in even worse circumstances.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: tanstaafl

I'm sorry he had to learn the hard way. I'm idealistic enough to hope though that it's better than not learning when he did and finding himself in even worse circumstances.

I agree...

I'm a recovered (some say always recovering) addict/alcoholic (alcohol wasn't my drug of choice, but when I drank, I drank to excess and then some), and even though it royally screwed me up for decades (due to my starting using drugs at 13), I wouldn't trade the life lessons for anything. I've been clean/sober for 35+ years now, and I can also say, with absolute certainty, that due to some of the things that happened to me that I shouldn't have survived, some of these experiences are responsible for my faith today that, whatever it is, there is something higher than ourselves at work in our lives, and in this world. I call it God, even though I don't subscribe to any particular church, and don't believe everything in the Bible is the absolute literal truth. For exanple I don't believe in the Rapture, or that someone is condemned to 'eternal damnation' in the form of eternal agonizing torturous punishment just because they don't have the ability to believe that 'Jesus died for their sins', and that 'believing in him is the only way to avoid the 'lake of fire'', etc. In my opinion, any God that would do such a thing is not a God worth following.

If God wants anything, he wants us to be good and moral, but also be thoughtful, discerning, and above all else, be seekers of the truth regardless of where it leads.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Beautifully said.

I have nothing to add.