The "Plandemic," a culling of the human herd: My earlier theory brought back to life.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: nugget1
I was trying to keep an open mind until congress exempted themselves from being vaccinated. That sealed the deal for me; it wasn't ever about health or saving lives.

Almost all of the Democrats were vaxxed already, so the Democrats excempted others from something that the had already done themselves in order to prevent it from becoming yet another partisan issue.

Someday you'll surprise me and post something true. It'll be entirely accidental because I've seen no evidence of it happening before, but with how prolific your lies are it's bound to have some vague similarify to the truth eventually.

"Most" of the entire group was vaccinated as of April of 2021, which includes Republicans.

While roughly 75 percent of members have been vaccinated, Pelosi said she cannot force the 25 percent who have not opted to get the vaccine to do so, citing privacy concerns.

"So here’s the thing: We cannot require someone to be vaccinated. That’s just not what we can do, it is a matter of privacy to know who is or who isn’t. I can’t go to the Capitol physician and say, ‘Give me the names of people who aren’t vaccinated so I can go encourage them to,’ or make it known to others to encourage them to be vaccinated,” she told reporters.

“So we can’t do that. But you would hope that science would guide them to protect themselves, their family members and be good colleagues in the workplace to get vaccinated. And the sooner that happens, the better for everything.”

From the horses mouth

Funny, it's a privacy issue for them yet they support it not being one for us.

I hope I'm never caught making up lies to support hypocritical authoritarians.

Read it again, you've just supported my argument.

I said that they were most vaxxed, and you've confirmed it
.

They did that before the two weeks to flatten the curve had past here.

It was hilarious.

/sarc

a reply to: nugget1

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: incoserv


Apple doesn't fall from the tree.

Just so you know, the reason folks might not like you (www.abovetopsecret.com...) is you.

a reply to: incoserv

Back in February of 2020 my first thought was 'what if the most powerful people on earth simply got tired of being stuck in traffic alongside the rest of us?`.

Having all that power and money but no 'lebensraum', as Klaus would say.

Some people get stuck on the issue of the elite needing us to carry out their bidding, or at the very least assume that we'll be kept alive because how will the elites profit if there's no one to exploit?

There simply won't be an economy resembling anything we know in the long term.

Automation coupled with AI will replace most humans in a few years, in every field of endeavor.

No more lazy, striking and protesting workers to pretend to care about.

Some people ask why are they buying up property if not wanting to rent it out?

That is true in the short term but ultimately I think they will weaponize their holdings by making it impossible for people to afford cost of living which we can already see through rising food prices, exorbitant property sellers market, fuel prices.

How many farms will still exist and what number of people will they be able to feed proper food while the rest of us are encouraged to eat bugs?

I understand how we will get to 'own nothing'.

I understand we are 99% arrived at 'no privacy'.

However we are nowhere near understanding their vision of 'be happy' unless they don't mean that in the literal sense, which completely diverts from the truth held by the first two statements.

Are they going to simply share their future with those of us still standing after the dust settles?

Slavery has evolved to such a sophisticated level as to indicate that those that are enslaved should marvel at their chains reflecting the sunlight.

The mind has to be fooled first into accepting the construct otherwise the slave will become troublesome.


Something unknown still needs to happen for the 'you will be happy part' to start making any sense.

My thoughts are that when they feel like they have culled enough of the population, they will flip the narrative and start show trials and go after those that pushed the shots. Then they will have executions and those people will disappear and start a new life elsewhere, while the ones who didn't take the clot shots think that the good guys are in control. And with a reduced population everywhere, the excuse will be that we need to herd everyone into cities in order to better provide services instead of straining resources to provide for those that live far away from "society".

a reply to: Ksihkehe

Sometimes it's not even worth the bother to reply.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Let us not forget how the timing was perfect with the begining of 2020 the virus appears like it's on a perfect schedule. Right in time for the decade of agenda 2030.

Except sewage samples show that it was already circulating in Europe in fall 2019.

That's actually to my point in that it was made an issue until it was politically useful.

Either it's really not that serious an illness and they sat on it until it was expedient to use it, or they intentionally wanted it to get bad enough to weak havoc.

a reply to: 19Bones79

Something unknown still needs to happen for the 'you will be happy part' to start making any sense.

I take their "you will be happy" to be like when I was a kid and my mother put those damned brussel sprouts in front of me and said, "You're gonna eat it and like it."

Their definition of "happy" of very subjective and very different from mine.

originally posted by: incoserv
a reply to: 19Bones79

Something unknown still needs to happen for the 'you will be happy part' to start making any sense.

I take their "you will be happy" to be like when I was a kid and my mother put those damned brussel sprouts in front of me and said, "You're gonna eat it and like it."

Their definition of "happy" of very subjective and very different from mine.

look at the guy with a bullet hole in his forehead. He doesn't look very happy, you don't want to be like him, do you? (see, now you are "happy".)

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: incoserv


Apple doesn't fall from the tree.

Just so you know, the reason folks might not like you (www.abovetopsecret.com...) is you.

And yet, there are some whose approval would worry me, even make me question myself.

originally posted by: incoserv
a reply to: InwardDiver

I lean toward a nasty combination of the two, and maybe more outright hubris than ignorance. The two are often nearly indistinguishable.

I think many, even among the conspiracy minded, underestimate those administrating cities, countries, the planet and their criminal corporate friends. Never forget, these are the same ilk who sterilized tens of thousands of women without their knowledge for decades. The same folks who gave hundreds of black men syphilis and refused to treat them so they could monitor the progression and end result. Experimented on the American public 100's of times secretly, including mind control experiments. the list goes on and on.

We need to stop making excuses for these soulless creatures and realize they are capable of exactly what you wrote in your OP and a lot more. It IS malice. Don't ever doubt it.

a reply to: incoserv

What if after resisting all of your years of bovine feces and coercion I ain't willing to "listen," then? What's that gonna cost me?

Death, or the closest to it, without dying.

That's what it always comes to.

To be truly free, you have to be willing to die IMO.

That, or cave to their demands/philosophy.

Good thread and if this isn't it with the Covax, then it's coming soon, either way IMO.

They've just been waiting for the technology to enable their "vision" of the future...

a reply to: incoserv

That's what bugs me about this whole thing.

Happiness can't be forced, unless..

They've guaranteed the other two conditions.

Will happiness consist of triggering the necessary parts of the brain to induce such a state?

a reply to: InwardDiverThe elite is a very vague term. From our perspective we often believe we have an enemy that are all briefed on some over-arching conspiracy, but I think that the truth is far more chaotic than that. This chaos is predicated on the complexity of all the systems and individuals that are required to bring about these big changes. Like a soldier on a battlefield, all any individual needs to know, is there duties. It wouldn't be efficient to ensure that every individual knew the bigger picture.

0

originally posted by: 19Bones79
a reply to: incoserv

...

Will happiness consist of triggering the necessary parts of the brain to induce such a state?

They are already doing that fairly successfully. Huxley's Soma is a thing. A large petition of America (I disremember the numbers) lives in a state of perpetual chemically induced stupor.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Let us not forget how the timing was perfect with the begining of 2020 the virus appears like it's on a perfect schedule. Right in time for the decade of agenda 2030.

Except sewage samples show that it was already circulating in Europe in fall 2019.

Here is more nonsense. Yeah they would need to start before 2020 so that it begins early 2020.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

they would need to start before 2020 so that it begins early 2020.

I'm going to let you muse on the above for a while.

originally posted by: incoserv
0

originally posted by: 19Bones79
a reply to: incoserv

...

Will happiness consist of triggering the necessary parts of the brain to induce such a state?

They are already doing that fairly successfully. Huxley's Soma is a thing. A large petition of America (I disremember the numbers) lives in a state of perpetual chemically induced stupor.

A brief search will show you that the number of American adults on mood altering drugs is quite high. The number of teens on prescribed medications altering mood is staggering.

They are starting children on these drugs, earlier and earlier. Right now as early as 8 and 9 years old.

We have really screwed up. We gave up parenting our children. We turned them over to the system. When all control was lost, we turned them over to the pharmacuetical companies.

We can rationalize, and make excuses until the cows come home. It is not chemical imbalances, it is not social media, it is not the schools or the government. It is plain and simple. Lack of parenting. And we did that.

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Let us not forget how the timing was perfect with the begining of 2020 the virus appears like it's on a perfect schedule. Right in time for the decade of agenda 2030.

Except sewage samples show that it was already circulating in Europe in fall 2019.

That's actually to my point in that it was made an issue until it was politically useful.

Either it's really not that serious an illness and they sat on it until it was expedient to use it, or they intentionally wanted it to get bad enough to weak havoc.

It might sound counter-intuitive, but it's actually both.

Covid itself isn't that dangerous. It kills maybe 1.3 percent of people that it infects, and then mostly only the elderly or those with co-morbidity like diabetes or heart disease. For the vast majority of people it is almost literally just a bad case of the flu that will need 3-7 days bed rest. A lot of people won't even need that.

So, it's not especially dangerous on an individual level.

But, and it's quite a significant but ... because people aren't used to covid it has the potential to infect a significant number of people. More than would be infected by regular winter flu.

This means that the actual effect of covid on the population can be quite serious.

if 50 percent of the US population gets covid that's 165 million people.

Say 0.5 percent die. That's 825,000. Which is the equivalent of dropping a small tactical nuke on Manhattan.

Now, say 25 percent of the people who get covid need to spend a whole week in bed.

That's an average loss of productivity of 7.74 hours per person per day for 5 days, for a total of 38.7 hours (Average for the US).

41,250,000 people (25 percent of the people who get covid, which is 50 percent of all people in the country), each losing 38.7 hours of productivity. That's 1,596,375,000 hours of lost productivity for the country. Which is a whole huge heap of money lost.

Now, take the costs. If you just get covid as the flu it can cost maybe a week's worth of shifts if you don't get sick pay, but if you get badly sick it can cost upwards of $10,000, and if you need critical care we're talking in the region of $200,000 and above.

A lot of people who get covid are old or poor, so a lot of the cost will be paid by the state. That's your tax dollars.

a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn

A brief search will show you that the number of American adults on mood altering drugs is quite high.

And to think that so many people on ATS want weed to be regulated like alcohol.

Imaging if the NWO could get you to drug yourself, and like it.