The "Plandemic," a culling of the human herd: My earlier theory brought back to life.

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

a reply to: Lumenari

That's actually how I read the comment. Didn't even realize what was actually typed.

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck

originally posted by: tamusan
a reply to: incoserv

My only problem with your theory is that I suspect that "the elite" would prefer the people doing whatever they are told to over those who would fight their authority. 

I remember saying this same thing in past threads on this same topic. I was given laundry lists because "the elite" would prefer the free thinkers over the idiots. All of that is really moot. The robots are going to fill in those gaps in the future. Why wouldn't "the elite" prefer the idiots who conform over the ones who are fighting the system of the elite?

Like I posted earlier, there are very few free thinkers compared to idiots, so kill off the majority who are idiots and the hand full of thinkers left is easy to control. Plus they want some good breeding stock left to juice up their eugenics program after the culling.

Without the freethinkers around to get in the way, they could convince as many idiots as they want to march into one of those disintegration booths like they did in an original Star Trek episode. All they'd have to do is tell them it's for the greater good, just like they've done with vaccines.

Why would they really need breeding stock? There is a good supply of eggs and sperm already in storage. And even that is nearly unnecessary. We are almost at the point where we can mix up some chemicals to make a viable embryo without using real genetic material from a man and a woman. We are also nearing a future where we can grow people with the exact traits that we want. 

I am now wondering if the LGBTQ push is to get as many people as possible to line up for lab babies so that it normalizes faster. 

You've never really specified what qualities the non-conformists possess that would make them more favorable to the elite. However, I am certain that robots will eventually be able to do those things. 

a reply to: incoserv


Nevermind!

originally posted by: incoserv
a reply to: tamusan

For the same reason that it's better to cull the stupid deer by luring them in with free food. You end up with a stronger population that knows how to survive.

Can you imagine a world filled with your average Tiktokker? Ponder on that for awhile. That is a scary thought!

I would guess - if this theory is even partially correct - that they calculate that once the population is reduced, those remaining, even if of the more thoughtful, self-reliant type, will be easier to corral and control.

As a man who's worked livestock, I can tell you from experience that a smaller herd of healthier, calmer and smarter livestock would beat all hell out of a larger herd of weaker, flightier, dumber animals.

You would have a valid point if we weren't so close to being able to mix up some chemicals and make a kid.

In 1955 a company 'Cutter' has a supposedly faulty polio vaccine that killed and gave the disease to thousands.

It was a mistake, a manufacturing problem ...

No it wasn't.

It was a live fire weapons test to see how the people of the world would react.

The people of the world failed the test and here we are.

Many other weapons tests have happened of the intervening years ... all to make the deaths seem normal business.

And here we are now in the midst of the primary deployment.

P

originally posted by: tamusan

originally posted by: incoserv
a reply to: tamusan

For the same reason that it's better to cull the stupid deer by luring them in with free food. You end up with a stronger population that knows how to survive.

Can you imagine a world filled with your average Tiktokker? Ponder on that for awhile. That is a scary thought!

I would guess - if this theory is even partially correct - that they calculate that once the population is reduced, those remaining, even if of the more thoughtful, self-reliant type, will be easier to corral and control.

As a man who's worked livestock, I can tell you from experience that a smaller herd of healthier, calmer and smarter livestock would beat all hell out of a larger herd of weaker, flightier, dumber animals.

You would have a valid point if we weren't so close to being able to mix up some chemicals and make a kid.

Are we? Really? You're so certain of that? How?

Check out my thread from last year on this:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: incoserv


Those in positions of ultimate political and economic dominance are defined by their intent on control. It is all about control. The pandemic, the mandates and the v-axing were all exercises in control. The fourth control will be digital currency along with its constraints. The fifth will be control of the internet i.e. no more anonymity. We know that they have been mouthing off about climate change for the longest time and you could look at that as being another way of controlling the population i.e. “we are the supreme scientific authority on what is happening with the weather and you will come to know that climate makes or breaks food production” Even a fool knows “ya gotta eat!” So they will follow for the benefit of the greater good, just like they did when the “plague” scoured the world.

I understand the reasoning that says they need the greater population to rent their properties and buy their products etc. Yes, they need “a” population. Just not the “accidental” population that exists now. They are all about control. They want to create their own people, their own product. That is why they wouldn’t see it to be unconscionable to “phase out” the majority of people who now exist (without licence). They are only a collection of cells anyway. Cells that grew on their farm. (The planet) Animal farmers these days in “Agribusiness” no longer say, “I keep cattle.” They say “I am growing beef. Meaning they are growing the meat cells, not raising livestock. The human controllers see things the same way.

There is every possibility that the climate is due to become severely disruptive to food supply one way or another and I believe that that is the actual great reset where the control freaks go into hibernation. When they do emerge it will be as creators of their own people. G.M. babies born to surrogates. There will no longer be any outsiders who have enough power or influence to yell “Nazi” or “Hitler”. The new humanity will consider themselves to be far superior to the old. All poor kids dream of being the sons and daughters of the rich and fortunate. “I wish my daddy owned the bank.”

a reply to: incoserv

It's been on my mind for a while.

The argument is always why would they kill off their supporters?

I look at it differently.

When you're untouchably wealthy and the kind of person that is into eugenics and genocide, sociopath megalomaniacs, why would you care who is culled to meet your goals? These aren't rational people. Rational people don't live the way they do while promoting the eating of bugs and voluntarily giving up the right to private ownership. They don't care who dies and their militant supporters in the West often meet much of their criteria for useles eaters. This while having even higher resource demands than the millions of people in the third world that they already have said will have to go.

You set things up to protect yourself and your interests and then utilize the most effective tool you have to achieve the goal you want. They have been siphoning larger and larger portions of the global economy to the top, they have been buying land and homes in places like NZ, and they have been fairly open about all their plans to anybody that cares to read or listen.

When the vaccines came out I said it will be five to ten years by the time the impacts are fully understood. Ten years from deployment, for the fastest vaccine in history using a previously unapproved delivery with poor outcomes, puts us at 2030. Where have I heard that number before?

The intentional spending deeper into a deficit while the economy crumbles. The absurdly blatant lies about easily observable things. The irrational mandates. The attempts to fully vaccinate children in spite of them being totally inappropriate. Vaccinating for a coronavirus mid-pandemic when all previous data says it will end badly. The desperate need to get Trump out of office. Going so far as to have large numbers of IC officials directly issue statements to the public that were lies to influence an election. The urgency to spend billions in Ukraine to try collapsing the uncooperative Russia while ignoring the risk of nuclear exchange. The seemingly nonchalant canceling of human rights to achieve vaccine compliance. The extremist approach taken against doctors or scientists speaking out. A guy like Fauci lying about something with such an overwhelming precedent like masks. The radical change of the vaccine definition. The massive smear campaigns to support their failure to consider any existing drug as effective early treatment to loophole an EUA. All in a new light.

It's clear now that this isn't about health or saving lives. We still have a few people in denial here and some tireless promoters of blatant lies. The absolute best case scenario is that this is a massive money grab with reprehensible disregard for human suffering. When that's the best case scenario we aren't in a world recognizable to most normies and the most extreme among them now display symptoms consistent with psychosis. Complete detechment from reality. It's total immersion in an alternate reality where survival means ignoring all that contradicts it or striking out in anger against those that threaten it.

There's a lot more that doesn't make sense, small things and large. When you just switch from asking why would they kill their biggest supporters to asking why they wouldn't, it all actually starts to make perfect sense. There will be no going back to normal for most, that's for sure. No matter the intent it's a disaster that makes little sense.

a reply to: incoserv



Sorry. Could not resist.

a reply to: incoserv

There are a lot of primers that have been produced. Some go back decades.

I would suggest you start with the movie "Goodbye World". There are a ton of others, but Goodbye world is so relatable to me because I personally know a few groups of friends that think they have figured it all out and, think they ready for anything.

They are prepared for what they have constructed in their minds. They are clueless and not in the least prepared for the reality of what is coming.

Let us not forget how the timing was perfect with the begining of 2020 the virus appears like it's on a perfect schedule. Right in time for the decade of agenda 2030.

From a soul perspective, they have sorted out the wheat and disposed of the chaff. What is intended next for the wheat should be of some concern... but of course, even the best laid schemes o' mice an' men, gang aft agley!

a reply to: Ksihkehe

Whoa! You sound like a conspiracy theorist!

originally posted by: nugget1
I was trying to keep an open mind until congress exempted themselves from being vaccinated. That sealed the deal for me; it wasn't ever about health or saving lives.

That was purely to avoid conflict with anti vax republicans.

Almost all of the Democrats were vaxxed already, so the Democrats excempted others from something that the had already done themselves in order to prevent it from becoming yet another partisan issue.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Let us not forget how the timing was perfect with the begining of 2020 the virus appears like it's on a perfect schedule. Right in time for the decade of agenda 2030.

Except sewage samples show that it was already circulating in Europe in fall 2019.

a reply to: incoserv

The big problem with this being a depopulation weapon is that its just so bad at it. If this were an Ar15, it would be loaded with nerf darts and you'd primarily kill people by firing into their mouths while they were masturbating in the hope that they'd be so shocked that they'd fall down the stairs chasing you out of their house.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: nugget1
I was trying to keep an open mind until congress exempted themselves from being vaccinated. That sealed the deal for me; it wasn't ever about health or saving lives.

Almost all of the Democrats were vaxxed already, so the Democrats excempted others from something that the had already done themselves in order to prevent it from becoming yet another partisan issue.

Someday you'll surprise me and post something true. It'll be entirely accidental because I've seen no evidence of it happening before, but with how prolific your lies are it's bound to have some vague similarify to the truth eventually.

"Most" of the entire group was vaccinated as of April of 2021, which includes Republicans.

While roughly 75 percent of members have been vaccinated, Pelosi said she cannot force the 25 percent who have not opted to get the vaccine to do so, citing privacy concerns.

"So here’s the thing: We cannot require someone to be vaccinated. That’s just not what we can do, it is a matter of privacy to know who is or who isn’t. I can’t go to the Capitol physician and say, ‘Give me the names of people who aren’t vaccinated so I can go encourage them to,’ or make it known to others to encourage them to be vaccinated,” she told reporters.

“So we can’t do that. But you would hope that science would guide them to protect themselves, their family members and be good colleagues in the workplace to get vaccinated. And the sooner that happens, the better for everything.”

From the horses mouth

Funny, it's a privacy issue for them yet they support it not being one for us.

I hope I'm never caught making up lies to support hypocritical authoritarians.

What sort of timescale are we talking about for this depopulation?

Certainly, within 100 years, almost everyone who has been vaccinated will be dead .....

But in the meantime, global populations continue to rise.