The demonisation of Dr Campbell

It is interesting watching the online reports from John Campbell, as he now has over a million followers, this means he is a main influencer and thus in the early days when he was trusting with regards to the data was relatively pro-vaccine, but as the facts have been slowly unfolding and he is now in the opposite camp with regards to these mRNA vaccines a demonization process has been started on some main platforms to shape opinion. It is an education on how this is being done note the Wikipedia page. Since the man has only a fact-based narrative, to steer public opinion away from this would require a lot of powerful forces and money coming together in the attack. Here a fellow doctor analyses the demonization and comes to the conclusion that with regards to the UK it is foreign interference which looks like the old boys are up to their same old tricks again.

That's nothing new to the scientific community.

All moat all the great stories of scientific discovery starts with the protagonist being attacked in some way by the scientific establishment because the protagonist isn't willing to accept the prevailing scientific dogma of the time.

For all the big pharma propaganda about "discrediting" anyone who goes against the narrative:

Discredit = Witch Hunt

Hilarious...

a reply to: anonentity

Dr. Dhand is not the only doctor standing up for Dr. Campbell. And there are other doctors now posting to Youtube, sharing how they were given erroneous data, which lead them to give inaccurate data to their patients, and prevented them for providing their patients with optimal care.

I think most of them were truly deceived, but they should have known better. Of course, I can understand, when you are a medical doctor, educated in the way of using pharmaceuticals as your main tool for treatment of care, that you may not have thought it possible that the industry that created you, would throw you under the bus.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Hilarious...

Hi, Would you mind starting a new thread on this video please?

I know it's a bit cheeky to ask, but I know you will do a better job than me going by your posting history 👍🏼

I was thinking of a title something like "for the pro covid vaxers"

With the (peer reviewed public) numbers from Pfizer and moderna, and the other numbers where vaccines have been withdrawn? (for the sheep scared too press play on the vid)

Many thanks if you do, I also just don't have time right now. 🙏🏻
Albert

Spam removed by staff.

a reply to: anonentity
I was one of the people that subbed to John Campbell from the start of the pandamic to try to understand what was really happening from a medical prespective ,and the way he explained things made him loved by a lot of people and seeing how he reacted on news and data coming out over time was fun to see.

a reply to: anonentity

Demonisation of Campbell may be a huge misstep by those perpetrating it.

Any of those million followers, plus the many millions who watch without subscribing have no better example of someone who's defended the official narratives throughout by using data and now questions those narratives using new data from known, trusted sources - often official sources and always scientifically recognised.

To suddenly begin a witch hunt will make it startlingly clear to those millions of followers and casual watchers that those voices and platforms doing this demonising are lying. His methods and credibility have not altered, so the voices against him reveal themselves as the liars. Ergo it will only strengthen the case to question and not trust the official narrative.

This could well backfire on them big time, increasing his followers.

originally posted by: McGinty
a reply to: anonentity

Demonisation of Campbell may be a huge misstep by those perpetrating it.

Any of those million followers, plus the many millions who watch without subscribing have no better example of someone who's defended the official narratives throughout by using data and now questions those narratives using new data from known, trusted sources - often official sources and always scientifically recognised.

To suddenly begin a witch hunt will make it startlingly clear to those millions of followers and casual watchers that those voices and platforms doing this demonising are lying. His methods and credibility have not altered, so the voices against him reveal themselves as the liars. Ergo it will only strengthen the case to question and not trust the official narrative.

This could well backfire on them big time, increasing his followers.

What they have done to the medical providers is what I world call a checkmate.

Medical doctors have been under the thumb of the pharmaceutical companies for centuries, because the doctors sold their souls to them when they came calling. The money was too good to pass up, so they gave up honor, prestige, and status, for trophy wives, flashy cars, and big houses.

Once they had them by the balls, the insurance companies came along and took complete control of their practices. They gave them detailed instructions on how to treat their patients. What meds to prescribe, what test to run, what devices and brands to use, and even whether they could place a patient in a hospital, and exactly how long they could stay.

Many doctors have lost patients, and even if the patients stay, many have lost faith and trust, and see them in less than a favorable light.

Doctors have become minions for the devil, and the devil has no love or respect for them, and will kick them to the curve without so much as the batting of an eye.

Nurse are lying right beside them under that bus. The only difference I see, is that nurses can try to assuage their quilt, because all they were doing is following the doctors orders.

And to be honest most of the young ones do not know any better. But us old school nurses know that you never follow an order, regardless of who gives it, if you don't believe it is, safe, what is best for the patient, and the patient fully consents without duress.

Another reason why our numbers are few.

Well done John, no good deed goes unpunished.

Thought you dropped the ball a bit going on with how masks are a good idea. They have a place, but not all the time. The cognitive dissidence you showed in the early days when finding a WTF? really helped keep your channel alive. You have been on the ball since the start and a regular long term player on the field. It takes a lot of work to get those kind of subscribers. Is that bigger than CNN these days?

This makes me respect him one-hundred fold more. Anybody who has a public spotlight on then and is not being demonized by the mass media and legacy public institutions is without a doubt a shill and a liar.

God Bless, John Campbell. Every unholy reason to bend and fold poured down on him yet in response he shows his big ones and follows truth wherever it leads. Bravo, Sir.

Here's a recently posted mash up of Dr Campbell's journey from official narrative promoter to official narrative sceptic. It's pretty good...



The uploader lays it on pretty thick with the Gates & Bilderberg conspiracy angles, which is a shame, since Campbell's journey is so compelling it doesn't need the added relish. The selection of clips, boiling down Campbell's last 3 years are really very well chosen.

I've often turned to Campbell to keep me on the straight and narrow of data based critical thinking, since over the past 3 years it's been all to easy to stray a little too far down the rabbit hole (which, lets face it we all have a tendency towards here, or we wouldn't be here). To see Campbell's 3 year long 180 degree turn on his faith in the adjudicators of medical authenticity is at once validating and should be highly worrying for any sceptics with an open mind.

........
Btw, i'm not saying this youtuber's conspiracy angles are too far fetched. Frankly not much does seem far fetched these days, so who knows? It's just that Campbell's u-turn adds a great deal of credibility to the concerns of many here, but when you over sell it, then that credibility will inevitably be diminished by association in the eyes of conspiracy sceptics that might otherwise have found reason to question things in this Dr's narrative. Surely those folk are the one's Campbell's realisations need to reach. Anything less is just preaching to the converted.

originally posted by: McGinty

Video removed...

Doesn't that tell us everything we need to know about who's calling the shots at YT...

Campbell's comments are always based on verified data.

His recent concern for the validity of the official narrative is always caveated with statements making it clear that they are not statements of fact, but instead concerns and questions regarding the inconsistencies in the offical narrative.

...So he must be giving YT's legal department a headache as they try to ban him. But at some point they may choose to do so without justifiable legal cause.

If someone as qualified, even minded and careful as Campbell suddenly disappears from YT it'll be like the platform is screaming for those listening that the vaccines are indeed dodgy

In his latest vid he suggests that his vids may stop happening. Whatever happens, he's been one of the heroes of the past 3 years

a reply to: McGinty
On YouTube only?

originally posted by: McGinty

originally posted by: McGinty

Video removed...

Doesn't that tell us everything we need to know about who's calling the shots at YT...

Campbell's comments are always based on verified data.

His recent concern for the validity of the official narrative is always caveated with statements making it clear that they are not statements of fact, but instead concerns and questions regarding the inconsistencies in the offical narrative.

...So he must be giving YT's legal department a headache as they try to ban him. But at some point they may choose to do so without justifiable legal cause.

If someone as qualified, even minded and careful as Campbell suddenly disappears from YT it'll be like the platform is screaming for those listening that the vaccines are indeed dodgy

Yep, of course they're gonna remove it. They have been instructed by big pharma / deep state to do it. Just like Twitter was doing.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

He was specific - he just hinted at it