It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: tanstaafl
When palliative care is an option, great. As it becomes less effective in the latter stages of some conditions, the individual going through the agony is in the best position to decide if they can bear it or just wants it to stop. I expect in most situations the family can make a unified decision in how to proceed.
For the situations where such an agreement cannot be made, this policy position appears reasonable.
Then in Canada there are the kids who are just depressed. Now they can decide they want to die because they are depressed.
originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: ketsuko
Then in Canada there are the kids who are just depressed. Now they can decide they want to die because they are depressed.
On am not on board with depression as a reason for euthanasia, these things can and do change over time. Here it does require a diagnosis of a terminal condition before such an option is explored.
originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: tanstaafl
Have you ever worked in a hospice setting, looked after one who is on a slow and tortuous exit? It is a bad situation to be in. Been with someone when they are on 1g of morphine a day and still moaning in pain?
The medical system is pretty good in predicting how these events go, has a lot of experience with it.
No, thankfully, but fail to see the point.
originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: tanstaafl
If I was the person tasked with giving the hot shot, I would want to look that person in the eye and make sure this is the right thing to do.