It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Peeple
And (that's going to piss some off Trigger Warning )
our Creator are single cell organisms.
They have the basic of everything, they're clones often and if information cloning means like horizontal consciousness transfer, they're basically one being every type.
...
What do many scientists claim? All living cells fall into two major categories—those with a nucleus and those without. Human, animal, and plant cells have a nucleus. Bacterial cells do not. Cells with a nucleus are called eukaryotic. Those without a nucleus are known as prokaryotic. Since prokaryotic cells are relatively less complex than eukaryotic cells, many believe that animal and plant cells must have evolved from bacterial cells.
In fact, many teach that for millions of years, some “simple” prokaryotic cells swallowed other cells but did not digest them. Instead, the theory goes, unintelligent “nature” figured out a way not only to make radical changes in the function of the ingested cells but also to keep the adapted cells inside of the “host” cell when it replicated.9* [No experimental evidence exists to show that such an event is possible.] [whereislogic: let alone that it actually happened that way, but that doesn't stop anyone in the camp of promoters of evolutionary philosophies and myths from promoting and telling their story and making it sound as if there is evidence for it, and sounding convincing to the biased beholder that has already been conditioned to believe these myths fall under the category "science", as they are being promoted, and wants to believe these myths.]
...
9. Encyclopædia Britannica, CD 2003, “Cell,” “The Mitochondrion and the Chloroplast,” subhead, “The Endosymbiont Hypothesis.”