They did a oopsie, Lawsuits are expected.

More new lawsuits agaisnt C19 is expected to be coming out.

It appears that Media lied to people about the C19 mRNA not being able transferred into your DNA.


These are interesting signs of development on this area.
Simply due because both Pfizer and moderna stocks are slightly down due to the lack of demand for their boosters and vaccines.

Lawsuits are expected

Those lawsuits are going to be of interest to companies like Monsanto.

Genetic discrimination? Hmm...

How much are private companies going to be allowed to modify a customer's genome? With consent? Without consent?

What about the genomes of other living things? Plants, pets, environment?

We will soon develop the ability to custom tailor genes... Genetic engineering is going to be a legal wild west very soon.

originally posted by: vNex92
More new lawsuits agaisnt C19 is expected to be coming out.

It appears that Media lied to people about the C19 mRNA not being able transferred into your DNA.


These are interesting signs of development on this area.
Simply due because both Pfizer and moderna stocks are slightly down due to the lack of demand for their boosters and vaccines.

Lawsuits are expected

I have paid tribute to Pfizer a few days ago with a thread about six major scandals to remember!

I hope that Pfizer is sued by thousands of people and dismantled as a company due to its criminal past. Society should have never trusted pharmaceutical companies that are well known to have a toxic reputation and are subjected to multi-billion dollar criminal fines having committed a range of offences including fraud and having damaged the lives of many citizens.

Same is true for the other pharmaceutical companies.

Pfizer and Moderna C19 vaccines were granted full FDA aproval this year; I hope they put a hold on these new findings are thoroughly investigated.

Full approval is granted when, over time, the FDA has amassed even more scientific evidence to support use of the COVID-19 vaccines, showing that the benefits of the vaccine are greater than its risks, and that the vaccines can be manufactured reliably, safely and with consistent quality.

www.hopkinsmedicine.org...

a reply to: nugget1

While you had the CDC saying earlier.

One arm for the Flu and one arm for Covid.

a reply to: vNex92

Say hello to my little friend!
And the other arm is for holding more ammo.

Nothing changes for the better.

countries, governments, corporations.

it wont ever stop if these things exist.


We really never did have a real chance, something went wrong at the very beginning.

Do any lawsuits mention chimeras ? ☠️

Oopsies, they figured out that doubling their revenue in one year by force mandating people to get injected with poison was a teensy bit unethical.

How anyone could claim that a genetic therapy does not affect your genetics is ridiculous. Everything affects our genetics and how its expresses, diet, environment, trauma. To get in there and hack our biological code and expect no repercussions is like letting some kid mess around with your computers system files and expecting your computer will run fine.

So now we have all those that died suddenly hitting that blue screen of death. As for what is going to happen with the long term generational affects for those that do survive and reproduce?

Some of our DNA has been decoded with how proteins are constructed. With our junk understanding on what the rest of it does, for anyone to claim to know anything is lacking scientific integrity.

There have been a lot of lies used to push the fear and force compliance.

a reply to: vNex92

While I'm all for these lawsuits, the problem is that the taxpayers are handed the fines/fees
Make the actual culprits pay for once ! All these corrupt scrummy multimillionaire corporations!

a reply to: Asmodeus3

They are untouchable: "Too big to fail" , also why corrupt/criminal banks get bailed out.
It seems the more corrupt and criminal your company is , the bigger it will become (bribes, bail outs, taxpayer funded)

And when you kill a man you're a murderer
Kill many and you're a conqueror
Kill them all and you're a God

Megadeth Captive Honour

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: nugget1

While you had the CDC saying earlier.

One arm for the Flu and one arm for Covid.

That's a lie. They have sneaked the covid 'vaccine' in the flu vaccine.
I won't trust any 'vaccines' ever again.

This post sent a chill up my spine.

From where I sit the implications here are colossal, not simply because the results of the liver sample prove Pfizer misrepresented the safety of their product and assertion it didn't affect DNA, but because of the patent issue.

Circling back to 2013 there was a landmark case against Myriad genetics surrounding exclusive rights to patent a DNA sequence:

Can genes be patented?

A gene patent is the exclusive rights to a specific sequence of DNA (a gene) given by a government to the individual, organization, or corporation who claims to have first identified the gene. Once granted a gene patent, the holder of the patent dictates how the gene can be used, in both commercial settings, such as clinical genetic testing, and in noncommercial settings, including research, for 20 years from the date of the patent. Gene patents have often resulted in companies having sole ownership of genetic testing for patented genes.

On June 13, 2013, in the case of the Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that human genes cannot be patented in the U.S. because DNA is a "product of nature." The Court decided that because nothing new is created when discovering a gene, there is no intellectual property to protect, so patents cannot be granted. Prior to this ruling, more than 4,300 human genes were patented. The Supreme Court's decision invalidated those gene patents, making the genes accessible for research and for commercial genetic testing.

The Supreme Court's ruling did allow that DNA manipulated in a lab is eligible to be patented because DNA sequences altered by humans are not found in nature. The Court specifically mentioned the ability to patent a type of DNA known as complementary DNA (cDNA). This synthetic DNA is produced from the molecule that serves as the instructions for making proteins (called messenger RNA).

SOURCE

Supreme Court Ruling

It is that complementary DNA that serves as the instructions for making the (spike) protein mRNA part that got my attention.

The unprecedented campaign of pressure and fear-mongering to get the entire planet double-vaccinated, then boosted ad nauseam hardly requires elucidation from me, we've all lived it for the past two+ years. My concern here comes from the WEF and their all too ominous assertion that via Agenda 2030, we'll all "own nothing and be happy."

People have called B.S. repeatedly, suggesting that it's not possible, but with the looming CBDCs closing in, and the untold billions invested in these shots, I don't think it's too terribly far out to connect that dots that they could potentially claim ownership of human beings outright due to the patent right of one's now-altered DNA. Want to refuse? No problem, we'll just cut off your digital funds.

They've already told us in explicit detail WHAT TO EXPECT, just not the specifics explaining how they plan to move us from A to B.

Here is the NIH paper on the liver sample results.

I'll be watching this one very closely.

originally posted by: Archivalist
Those lawsuits are going to be of interest to companies like Monsanto.

Genetic discrimination? Hmm...

How much are private companies going to be allowed to modify a customer's genome? With consent? Without consent?

What about the genomes of other living things? Plants, pets, environment?

We will soon develop the ability to custom tailor genes... Genetic engineering is going to be a legal wild west very soon.

weird,

i just watched blade runner 2049.

are they making us replicants?

originally posted by: sarahvital

originally posted by: Archivalist
Those lawsuits are going to be of interest to companies like Monsanto.

Genetic discrimination? Hmm...

How much are private companies going to be allowed to modify a customer's genome? With consent? Without consent?

What about the genomes of other living things? Plants, pets, environment?

We will soon develop the ability to custom tailor genes... Genetic engineering is going to be a legal wild west very soon.

weird,

i just watched blade runner 2049.

are they turning us into replicants?

originally posted by: ancientlight
a reply to: Asmodeus3

They are untouchable: "Too big to fail" , also why corrupt/criminal banks get bailed out.
It seems the more corrupt and criminal your company is , the bigger it will become (bribes, bail outs, taxpayer funded)

And when you kill a man you're a murderer
Kill many and you're a conqueror
Kill them all and you're a God

Megadeth Captive Honour

You see, every powerful 'entity' was powerful and untouchable until the moment they fell. Countless examples in history.

All there is need to be done is applying pressure and speak to as many as possible about this matter. If there is political will with a bit of pressure from us then it will be a matter of time until these 'entities' are brought to justice.

I say, let the studies show as many results as the scientists can produce.

If true, this is alarmingly real. Change the rules, real. People have been spouting their claims for two years now. The mRNA doesn't alter DNA, it's gone within two weeks, the list goes on. If this study can be refuted or copied, tested, scrutinized and the results are similar, the world may be in for a giant surprise.

But hey, nothing to see here right?

a reply to: vNex92

i've said time and time again, anything that can go down to DNA level and communicate with it can ____ you up.
anyone who says other wise is a liar

a reply to: vNex92
I think the mRNA vaccines were a misstep. For some leaders -leaders we'll never know - maybe a step in the right direction (their right I'd say). But the research referred to here has been known for some time (since the beginning of this year)?? And fact-checked by Reuters? (Not that I believe Reuters) I hardly trust anyone anymore....

www.reuters.com...