The New Narrative Has A Fatal Flaw

originally posted by: godsovein

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Get the story straight, because it absolutely conflicts with the other narrative. You can't have two main story lines conflict with each other like this, even in clown world.

Oh yes you can! The same side screaming for shots is the same one that for years has been screaming for helping out blacks but also open borders, supporting women but then send men into locker rooms, being the party of labor unions but also open borders, for women but also islam, for being anti-war but then pro-war, and on and on.

Liberal Pretzel Logic.

Yes! Absolutely!

a reply to: slatesteam

Cherry picking countries?

How many times do I have to say that I can only speak for the UK?

What with living here and all.

How about addressing what I posted?

Or just carry on hand waving actual valid sources?

Got a problem with the British Heart Foundation?

a reply to: CrazyWater

Where are you a Nurse?

In the UK?

Did you actually read my source?

You certainly have not addressed any of it?

I posted about the UK and nothing that you posted addresses the points made by the BHF in my link.

Instead of dismissing it as "complete bullsnip" would you mind actually addressing the points they made?

The BHF is a well respected charity here that does an awful lot of good and doesn't really do "bullsnip"?

Being a Nurse, I'd have thought you might respect that?

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: MykeNukem

IMO , there should be Criminal Charges Filed Against the Heads of the FDA who Allowed these UNTESTED Vaccines on the Market . They All have the Blood of Innocents on their Hands......

I agree ZM.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Where are you a Nurse?

In Washington State, over 30 years and was the Covid charge nurse in my hospital for the entire duration of the pandemic

Did you actually read my source?

You certainly have not addressed any of it?

yes I did

I posted about the UK and nothing that you posted addresses the points made by the BHF in my link.

Instead of dismissing it as "complete bullsnip" would you mind actually addressing the points they made?

The BHF is a well respected charity here that does an awful lot of good and doesn't really do "bullsnip"?

I respect the fact that were seeing it all over the world, and though the numbers vary depending on country or region, the outcome is still the same

Your argument is like stating fentanyl isnt as deadly in your country because not as many people have taken it.

Being a Nurse, I'd have thought you might respect that?

Spare me the lame attempt at trying to target me being a nurse as if it should equate to some standard YOU think should be held by all

Any other physicians or nurses on this platform who work in these hospitals can verify the same information

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: slatesteam

Cherry picking countries?

How many times do I have to say that I can only speak for the UK?

What with living here and all.

How about addressing what I posted?

Or just carry on hand waving actual valid sources?

Got a problem with the British Heart Foundation?

You really don’t speak for the UK though, do you? Your post was laughable. Just another of the excuses to add to the list. Like here in Wales where shaking out you duvet was flagged as dangerous and could lead to a heart attack. The excuses are myriad. The odd thing is it appears to be correlating with the vaccine and most of those suffering these sudden deaths and heart failures are vaccinated. My mother-in-law is currently in hospital with heart failure, out of the blue. I have a funeral to attend next week for a fit, healthy and well off friend who just dropped dead. Heart attack. No previous.

a reply to: CrazyWater

Targeting you?

No, I asked you a polite question.

You haven't answered my point about what the BHF said.

Spare me your anger?

It's not warranted.

a reply to: ARM1968

Do you?

Instead of calling my post "laughable" (and do you find the British Heart Foundation "laughable"?) would you be so kind as to tell me what you might have to say about it?

Let me clarify, no I don't speak for the UK, obviously, what I meant was that I can only speak from my viewpoint HERE in the UK.

a reply to: CrazyWater

"Your argument is like stating fentanyl isnt as deadly in your country because not as many people have taken it."

No, it isn't.

And it's not my argument, it's not even an argument, it's just what the BHF have said?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: ARM1968

Do you?

Instead of calling my post "laughable" (and do you find the British Heart Foundation "laughable"?) would you be so kind as to tell me what you might have to say about it?

Let me clarify, no I don't speak for the UK, obviously, what I meant was that I can only speak from my viewpoint HERE in the UK.

Oh.

So your post is then quite laughable as it’s just your POV.

Got it. Also calm down. Your anger is showing.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: slatesteam

Cherry picking countries?

How many times do I have to say that I can only speak for the UK?

What with living here and all.

How about addressing what I posted?

Or just carry on hand waving actual valid sources?

Got a problem with the British Heart Foundation?

You don’t speak for the UK.

Next?

Well, I've been reading a few articles in different countries about these alleged sudden deaths and there could be other mitigating factors, such as during lockdown many people were not able or willing to venture out to be diagnosed for health problems (heart, high blood pressure etc.) so this may be where some of the undiagnosed deaths arise, also lately ambulance services are stretched to the limit and wait times are much longer and we all know time is of the essence to receive care with having good outcomes for heart attacks. And heart conditions in the younger population is more common that we realize.

www.acls.net...

What dataset is missing here are the coroner's reports, without them it's all conspiracy and guesswork.

Ikr? Anything but the obvious! Anything… a reply to: quintessentone

a reply to: slatesteam

How could I?

I can only speak about my experience here in the UK.

Obviously?

Enough about me, do you have anything useful to contribute about the article I linked to?

It's an actual article, not my PoV.

Like, a source?

a reply to: slatesteam

It's the POV of the British Heart Foundation, not mine, that I posted.

It's a very well regarded charity. Do you think it's "laughable"?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Since you keep asking people whats wrong with the charity you talk about... since you did not search anything yourself... but feel okay to share their BS here.


it took me 10 min to make a quick research on your so-called great charity. How do you check a charity ? Well maybe first by checking who is the boss. Thats the actual main, important thing to do. en.wikipedia.org...

1 - Who is behind it : A self called "Dr" Douglas gurr. www.bhf.org.uk...< br /> who worked for mckinsey (anyone who is awake since more than 6 months will know why this is important, I suppose you don't, I will let you check and find out if you are willing to have some knowledges about the world we live in)

2 - he promotes vaccines (page 4) so someone finding excuse while promoting it of course he will find excuses xD And the charity is even creating vaccines against hear disease (huge f/cking lol) page 14. They called themselves "expert about informations concerning the coNvid vax (page 16). The charity itself promoted it. Of course they will tell its anything but it that causes heart failure and all the crap happening to innocent people... I wont quote all pages but vax is everywhere on their last report. Big promoters and supporters. Do you think anyone promoting it wont help to create a fake excuse to not face jail and all after promoting a deadbrain-zombie vax trend ?

3 - He was head UK amazon and was already working HARD to make people like you believe any of all of this nonsense. And BOOM he became head of the charity out of nowhere and they attached to his name "doctor" (see the first pdf) while he never had it before (or used it) Thats pretty much trying to legitimate someone that is not so he is a con from the start. (like putting glasses on people's nose in TV to make people believe they are smart ahah) www.aboutamazon.com...

I stop here as its YOUR work to do and not mine. There is a lot of # to find (a lot more than the sneak peek I just wrote)

Giving your trust with ZERO researches and asking people to prove it for you is quite lazy to not say worst. You could have searched for yourself to build your own opinion. But like the majority of society, you take a knee to any narratives that makes you feel comfy while never ever searching yourself for the facts and truth.

good luck in your life.

a reply to: n00ne

Oh, I see, the BHF is evil and doesn't do any useful research or help to save lives.

I just put it out there hoping for a polite discussion but instead I get a nasty personal attack.

I'll put it down to the triumph of hope over experience.


Thanks for your input.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2


Good job at avoiding **every single pieces** I have bring to the table, responding to the question you kept asking.
xD

a reply to: n00ne

If you had done so politely and without all the snark and personal stuff I might have bothered to do so, but as you didn't....?

No, thanks.

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: Asktheanimals

Graphene oxide


Graphene oxide


I am getting suspicious they add that to food and water, cosmetics....

Many products in the grocery stores have a new label saying "contains bio-engineered ingredients". Given it's reactive nature to EM pulses I think there's a good chance it is being added to many products including pet foods. They don't just want people gone but their dogs and cats too.