Trump on twitter takeover!!!

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Asmodeus3

In this particular case he is the one 'involved' with Twitter as his account has been permanently banned. Of course he will make a comment about the change of leadership.

Well, yes, but it's only "of course" because it's Trump, and that's his nature -- moreso than because it's his right. It's also his right to say nothing. And even if Trump does say something, the media is not obligated to report it. The only purpose for the media to report Trump's comments is to agitate and divide.

But this is about more than just Trump. It's bigger than Trump. There were many many people purged from Twitter and other platforms for wrongspeak of one sort or another, and we're sure not going to hear the media reporting on every one.

What you are saying about the purge of accounts is true. And in general the purge of freedom of speech in many cases. I hope this changes and normality restored. I am not a fan of Elon Musk or anyone else.

It isn't a purge of free speech, it's a restoration of free speech by firing all the anti free speech people and the bots programmed to violate free speech.

We can wait and see if that happens right.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

What you are saying about the purge of accounts is true. And in general the purge of freedom of speech in many cases.

Exactly -- across the board. I know many conservative figures and organizations were banned as well. I know that many gender critical feminists were banned, as well as trans-critical gay individuals and groups. And we know that many doctors and health-related groups were purged over Covid issues.

But Trump is by far the most controversial and outrageous and therefore the best and easiest to rabble rouse and rile up the public.

I hope this changes and normality restored. I am not a fan of Elon Musk or anyone else.

Prayers up and fingers crossed!

originally posted by: Direne
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Let me guess what the guy said about Twitter.... covfefe??

Yes and it's delicious too!

a reply to: nugget1

At this point how can he be any worse than the former rich people that owned it???? Most of the complaints about Musk buying Twitter have come from sycophants of the deplatform movement. Also it is not like Musk bought it with all his own money! His investors also are going to want their investment to pay off.

As a none twitter user does this make me want to sign up......no not really, twitter just seems to always be someone getting angsty about someone else, will this change under Elon, perhaps, as in the balance of who is getting most angsty may change but it will still be people gettin angsty, I know I am to old for that nonsense, leave that to the teenagers.

No social media will ever be in equilibrium with everyone happy, they feed off angst and dopamine fed narcissism.

If MJ is supposedly the gateway to harder narcotics in terms of social media, is Twitter the gateway to tik tok?.....bleurgh

As we say in Blighty, twitter is just not my cup of tea

for others who use it regularly, I hope it gives you all that you seek

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Asmodeus3

In this particular case he is the one 'involved' with Twitter as his account has been permanently banned. Of course he will make a comment about the change of leadership.

Well, yes, but it's only "of course" because it's Trump, and that's his nature -- moreso than because it's his right. It's also his right to say nothing. And even if Trump does say something, the media is not obligated to report it. The only purpose for the media to report Trump's comments is to agitate and divide.

But this is about more than just Trump. It's bigger than Trump. There were many many people purged from Twitter and other platforms for wrongspeak of one sort or another, and we're sure not going to hear the media reporting on every one.

What you are saying about the purge of accounts is true. And in general the purge of freedom of speech in many cases. I hope this changes and normality restored. I am not a fan of Elon Musk or anyone else.

It isn't a purge of free speech, it's a restoration of free speech by firing all the anti free speech people and the bots programmed to violate free speech.

We can wait and see if that happens right.

I meant what has happened until now was purge of free speech.

I want to trust Musk, but I don't.
He has some major conflicts of interest.
He is a young global leader who was wef trained.
He has a vested interest in battery ran transportation and Chinese money.
He talks about Chinese workers being superior to Americans.
He is a nut job with his brain interface bs that jives with the wef transhuman crap.
He looks like a privatized gov spook operation hidden under "internet for rednecks."

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Asmodeus3

In this particular case he is the one 'involved' with Twitter as his account has been permanently banned. Of course he will make a comment about the change of leadership.

Well, yes, but it's only "of course" because it's Trump, and that's his nature -- moreso than because it's his right. It's also his right to say nothing. And even if Trump does say something, the media is not obligated to report it. The only purpose for the media to report Trump's comments is to agitate and divide.

But this is about more than just Trump. It's bigger than Trump. There were many many people purged from Twitter and other platforms for wrongspeak of one sort or another, and we're sure not going to hear the media reporting on every one.

What you are saying about the purge of accounts is true. And in general the purge of freedom of speech in many cases. I hope this changes and normality restored. I am not a fan of Elon Musk or anyone else.

It isn't a purge of free speech, it's a restoration of free speech by firing all the anti free speech people and the bots programmed to violate free speech.

We can wait and see if that happens right.

I meant what has happened until now was purge of free speech.

Ah, second time in a week I have misinterpreted/misread a post.

Time for me to slow down just a bit.

a reply to: UpThenDown

I set up an account about a year ago; I followed three pages that posted about Ps5 restocks. Once I could get mine secured, I got rid of the account. I used it solely to aggregate information from folks that do it full time; much easier that way. I don't really see another use for the platform myself.

originally posted by: Boadicea
I sure miss the days when former presidents melted into the woodwork and refrained from commenting on political issues...And I wish the MSM would ignore him and not give him any air time... and I really wish Trump would just STHU!!! He had his chance. He gave it his best shot. It is what it is, unless he declares for another presidential run, he is no longer relevant.

The rest of us need to get on with the people's business and Trump is just getting in the way.

Oh, the media lust to have Trump stories. They want to make any elections about Trump to rally their base because most of the MSM is nothing more than DNC political operatives and activists now.

What on earth will the democrats do if they cannot censor us to death??
Oh, well. LOL!

a reply to: infolurker

Oh, the media lust to have Trump stories. They want to make any elections about Trump to rally their base because most of the MSM is nothing more than DNC political operatives and activists now.

Most definitely! Trump is their weapon of choice for riling up the sheeple. They aren't exactly sure why they should hate Trump and tremble with fear at the mention of his name... but they know Orange Man Bad and that's all it takes...

It seems that's all they've really got too.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Asmodeus3

In this particular case he is the one 'involved' with Twitter as his account has been permanently banned. Of course he will make a comment about the change of leadership.

Well, yes, but it's only "of course" because it's Trump, and that's his nature -- moreso than because it's his right. It's also his right to say nothing. And even if Trump does say something, the media is not obligated to report it. The only purpose for the media to report Trump's comments is to agitate and divide.

But this is about more than just Trump. It's bigger than Trump. There were many many people purged from Twitter and other platforms for wrongspeak of one sort or another, and we're sure not going to hear the media reporting on every one.

It will always be about Trump because he's now elevated to a near demigod status, he's the voice everyone hears when anything remotely conservative is mentioned and that's a problem. Not because he's unprofessional or unscrupulous but because traditional American values, the definitive pillars of democracy as outlined in the Constitution, precede and transcend his political doctrine so there needs to be a more inclusive emblem of liberty and sovereignty beyond the idolatry that follows his every word.

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for POLITE political debate will be enforced.
Members must also Stay on Topic!!!
Go after the ball not the player.

Trolling, And What To Do About It






You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

originally posted by: Boadicea

Hell YES!!!

I actually considered adding that at the end -- "Same for Obama" -- but I didn't want it to come off as whataboutism. Although, it's perhaps even more applicable to Obama, because he's still quite involved behind the scenes.

But definitely, YES!!!

Well, Trump is going to run again so he is still relevant, and that makes his crappy tweets still relevant too.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

Well, Trump is going to run again so he is still relevant, and that makes his crappy tweets still relevant too.

When Trump actually declares and stops playing silly games, taunting/titillating his audiences, then he will be relevant.

Right now he's just a former prez at best, and a loser former prez who lost his second term at worst.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Boadicea

Hell YES!!!

I actually considered adding that at the end -- "Same for Obama" -- but I didn't want it to come off as whataboutism. Although, it's perhaps even more applicable to Obama, because he's still quite involved behind the scenes.

But definitely, YES!!!

Well, Trump is going to run again so he is still relevant, and that makes his crappy tweets still relevant too.

Great comment!!

originally posted by: Boadicea

Right now he's just a former prez at best, and a loser former prez who lost his second term at worst.

Well the funny part is he is more relevant then the sitting President...

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Asmodeus3

What you are saying about the purge of accounts is true. And in general the purge of freedom of speech in many cases.

Exactly -- across the board. I know many conservative figures and organizations were banned as well. I know that many gender critical feminists were banned, as well as trans-critical gay individuals and groups. And we know that many doctors and health-related groups were purged over Covid issues.

But Trump is by far the most controversial and outrageous and therefore the best and easiest to rabble rouse and rile up the public.

I hope this changes and normality restored. I am not a fan of Elon Musk or anyone else.

Prayers up and fingers crossed!

You see Trump is still a political figure and active one although he remains controversial. He could be nominated again and if he is to go head to head with Biden then it's almost certain he will be the next President of the United States.

He is also banned from Twitter.
You can see that Elon Musk knows what i have said above and he would like to have a very good relationship with the next President. He said he will lift the ban.

The situation with the social media is just unacceptable. They are promoting the vaccine ideology, the climate change ideology, and the transgender ideology. Clearly they are purging anyone who doesn't subscribe to these ludicrous and absurd ideologies which are regressive and antiscientific. They try to control the flow of information and dictate to others what is acceptable abe what is not.

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: Xtrozero

Well, Trump is going to run again so he is still relevant, and that makes his crappy tweets still relevant too.

When Trump actually declares and stops playing silly games, taunting/titillating his audiences, then he will be relevant.

Right now he's just a former prez at best, and a loser former prez who lost his second term at worst.

And then there's the part where, assuming he wins the 2024 election, he has until 2028 to "save America" and do it in a fashion that lasts more than 6 months the way things played out in 2020/21. He can't single handedly reinvent democracy, or congress, or legislature, or the propaganda industry, or assert enduring dominance in the arena of international trade relations and the so called economic reset predicted by the WEF. So what kind of permanency can we expect from any miracle he may or may not muster in the span of this decade during the peak of his career?