Apparently Parasites Infect People in the West, Too

originally posted by: Nevercompromise
It is a phage.

Are you talking about a white blood cell?

a reply to: chr0naut

Agreed. This is a field of study, not to mention treatment, that has been around for quite a long time.

I find this recent discovery to be interesting, but it's what the field of study is all about.

Awesome.
I just finished the video.
She is right there but missing a few things, most importantly the solvent aspect.
They weaponized this to replace the solvent with 5g for the interaction they are after.
Dr. Merritt just now showed me this.
I had not considered this interaction replaces the solvent.

She is somewhat mischaracterizing the problem with cysts.
The cysts are from the chemicals and solvents not being able by our organs to detox out due to sensitivity and overload.
So it gets deposited throughout our body and cysts form around it.
This becomes the breeding ground for the parasite eggs to begin their lifecycles inside our bodies instead of downstream in a snail.
And not all parasites are little wormy creatures.
The human intestinal fluke is a bug like creature the size of a piece of wheat germ in it's adult state.
It goes through 6 cycles to get from egg-adult.
Now check this out.
I learned everything we are discussing right now 30 years ago and Dr.
Merritt is just now getting this info.
In Huldas protocol you start with just a drop a day of each and progress slowly by adding 1 drop a day until you get up to max dosage after 30 days I think it is.
Because of the Hertz(something) effect Dr. Merritt pointed out.

And when you zap, which is a pulse frequency generator), you have to do it 3 times in a session.
I only did it twice the 1st time and got the worst cold I ever had in my life.
I got knocked out and slept for like 24 hours and all the hystanine effects.
The reason is this.
The electrical charge from zapping only emits through surfaces throughout our bodies.
You zap for something like 20 minutes then rest 10, zap a second time for 20 minutes, rest 10 and zap a 3rd time for 20 minutes.
The 1st zap hits all the larger parasites on the surfaces of our organs and kills them.
The 2nd zap hits the creatures that lived within those that just died and the 3rd time it kills all the eggs and other creatures from dead bacteria like viruses(I do not believe in virology as it is taught and explained and Dr. Merritt even implied the same).

I made my zapper from Huldas detailed instructions out of a shoebox and cost me 12 dollars.
If you are not severely ill and dying do the herbal protocol.
If you are dying.
Zap.

But removing all the toxic chemicals is a very difficult thing for most and where most of the work is.
And add 5g to the equation and the only solution becomes revolutionary in actions.
Remember when that respiratory illness hit just before COVID where they outlawed the nicotine treatment by blaming the respiratory problems on vaping nicotine(the treatment)?

She mentioned that also.
Good video.
Everything you are getting from me on this is 25-30 years and from memory.
Except the glycoprotein stuff which is mannatech and 20 years.
Both of these bodies of scientific goodness we are discussing is being weaponized in COVID, the vaccines and it does look like it is spread from nasal swabbing with that gel.

Hulda Clark "The Cure for all Cancers" needs to be shared with Dr. Merritt if not just for the herbal protocol as Hulda clinically worked out every detail.
Hulda did not print this book until she treated 100 people successfully in a row.
This book as all those studies for each individual.
The 2nd book was "The cure for HIV/AIDS" and has more in details as does the 3rd book "The Cure for all Diseases".
Her day might have finally come as she becomes vindicated at the same time Fauci gets villainized.

It is my opinion based on what I know and am now witnessing Fauci robbed very important breakthroughs in true Health and Wellness only to use it as weaponized depopulation tools.

There is very little doubt in my mind Fauci knew of Huldas research as well as glyconutrients and glycoprotein importance for cell health and function

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher

originally posted by: Nevercompromise

That dang picture of what they claimed was a macrophage keeps popping up in other depictions for decades now.

In Dr. Merritt's video she talks about a picture that's just CGI—the one on the right:

rumble.com...

The one on the left that the hypodermic needle is pointing to is a nanoparticle—a bioweaponized, smart, hydrogel.

I am a believer in our 2nd brain.
This is comprised of a collective body of bacteria in our upper chest.
Things like soil conversing at miles away instantaneously through vibrionic messaging through fungi at a quantum level leads me to believe our brain is the slow acting brain like a computer only there to operate the body.
Like when you speak and your tongue acts way before your brain could choose the words, sequence of words, gestures, facial expressions and hand movements, all nuance even before you say the first word.
And where the toungue attaches to the spinal cord downward and closer to the 2nd brain. And the distinction of the I'd and ego, etc...
It makes sense that AI is focused there to me.
But I know I am weird.
Somehow as as much lately

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher

"These may be AI themselves," as in artificial intelligence.

As in SYNTHETIC.

This thing about artificial intelligence brings us into the world of transhumanism, which means, if we haven't been dealing with the natural world, but rather a man-made world—created in weapons labs—for the past 2 1/2 years, in my opinion this is NOT a world for we the people, if we knew what we are actually dealing with. Think World Economic Forum and the "Great Reset."

Cured by sanitizing elections

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: DevotedResearcher

" Apparently Parasites Infect People in the West, Too "

Yes . We call them Liberal Democrats . Keeping your Mind and Body Clean Usually Keeps them Away .........

I am actually admittng I do not know what I am talking about.
I made a comment about something I knew about 15+years ago about artificial parasites, my only reference,and as time went on a visual depiction of it in the data I consumed was of a creature that has tainted the data because in my mind I started with this creature.
And it is not a macrophage now that I have progressed in my understanding.
The diagram I just posted shows what they call a phage.
That is the creature. And it is man made

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher

originally posted by: Nevercompromise
It is a phage.

Are you talking about a white blood cell?

originally posted by: Nevercompromise
Because of the Hertz(something) effect Dr. Merritt pointed out.

From The Medical Rebel:

. . . I got sneezy, eye watering, etc. consistent with mild Herxheimer reaction from too many dead parasites.

drleemerritt.com...

a reply to: Nevercompromise

Thanks for clarifying that.

When I read science and medical threads, I have to constantly look words used up in the dictionary; otherwise, I would not be able to understand a word of what's being said.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Silcone Synapse
I think I would opt for eating less food or doing more excercise rather than the tapeworm,but each to their own I suppose.

Except neither exercise and/or caloric restriction work for long term healthy fat loss. Never has, never will.

The CICO theory of fat loss has been thoroughly and totally debunked for some time now.

What? Calorie in/calorie out is literally the one thing that has never been debunked. Kind of impossible to debunk it, really, since it's basic thermodynamics.

Basically every diet fad ends up being a highly restrictive calorie in/calorie out diet.

Take keto for instance. You eat red meat, and cook it in fat. You feel satiated for longer periods of time because both protein and fat make you feel full.

Do you know how hard it is to eat 4 steaks a day? I'd be surprised if people on keto eat more than 1200 calories a day.

Intermittent fasting is the same thing. Most people aren't going to eat their daily required calories during their eating period, so they're left with a calorie deficit.

Calorie in/calorie out ALWAYS works. The problem is most people don't know how many calories they burn every day because they don't use an accurate heart meter to figure it out, and they don't get accurate serving sizes of the food they do eat and miscount their calories.

Double post

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
The one on the left that the hypodermic needle is pointing to is a nanoparticle—a bioweaponized, smart, hydrogel.

I watched a new interview of Dr. Merritt today where she mentioned that she's also seen "hydrogel" spelled "hydragel."

Hydra (ˈhaɪdrə)
n

(Classical Myth & Legend) Greek myth a monster with nine heads, each of which, when struck off, was replaced by two new ones

www.thefreedictionary.com...

The interview: COVID-19 IS NOT A VIRUS - DR. LEE MERRITT

Boron supplements are not very expensive and a little is included in many multivitamin/mineral pills. Boron is taken up readily by the skin and absorbed and is bioactive.....tossing a little Borax in the washer with the soap does help to increase levels when you wear the clothes, and it takes smells out of clothes too. I wouldn't eat borax though, there might be impurities in it.

Boron works on some parasites but not all. Tannins in coffee and tea are also anti-parasitic and there are four types of quinines in coffee, but probably more of one particular one in tea that helps to control parasites. Other foods are also active against parasites, there are too many to start listing, but each one helps a little in those foods, so that is why we should regularly eat certain veggies in moderation...too much can be a problem too because these are plant defense system chemistries and too much is also not good.

Pin worms are actually common parasites in people and are not too much of a problem unless they get overpopulated.

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
Natural parasites are one thing; synthetic parasites are something else.

Venom, like parasites, is part of the natural world.

But synthetic venom exists, apparently, because Dr. Bryan Ardis has brought to light much evidence of lab work being done to create it and companies being involved in marketing it.

Dr. Lee Merritt is friends with Dr. Bryan Ardis but she seems to have strong feelings about discrediting his efforts to educate the public about venom poisoning being the cause of COVID rather than a virus.

I know that Dr. Bryan Ardis and Tau Braun, Ed.D. are working on a documentary at present, soon to be released. I look forward to that documentary.

originally posted by: Silcone Synapse
a reply to: tanstaafl
Not having a go at you-but-if a person doesn't excersise and eats too much every day they will get fat as they are not using their consumed energy.

Half truths are the biggest problem here... your statement is true... until it isn't.

Yes, if someone is gorging themselves on 5000+ 'calories' a day, they will become morbidly obese (even if they are exercising), there is no question about that.

But that is as far as the truth of your comment and the fake science that underpins it goes.

First, the very word 'calorie' as used in this context is extremely problematic. A calorie is simply the amount of heat energy it takes to raise one kilogram of water one degree Celsius in temperature as measured in a bomb calorimeter. The problem is, our bodies are not bomb calorimeters, and we don't BURN substances we ingest, they are broken down and used by our bodies by bio-chemical processes that in no way whatsoever resemble what occurs in a bomb calorimeter.

Also, our bodies are not 'closed systems', meaning, it is not a simple math problem when determining the answers to these kinds of questions, as I explain in response to your next comment:

If that same person eats less and does daily excercise-and sticks to that long term-they lose weight and it stays off.

This false claim has been absolutely disproven by real, actual science.

First and foremost, our bodies are not stupid, they are actually very intelligent. We have innate systems that respond to things that we do, and/or external events/realities.

For example, yes, if one restricts the amount of food ingested and kills themselves with exercise, they will lose some weight initially - until your body's control/survival systems kick in. What actually happens is your body slows down your BMR (basal metabolic rate) to match the lowered amount of energy you are ingesting - actually, by a little more than what you lowered it. It does this as part of our innate survival mechanisms, in this case sensing that you are in a 'famine' state, so it needs to conserver energy. This is a huge problem, because it is your basal metabolic rate that determines 95+% of the number of 'calories' your body utilizes in any given 24 hour period simply to keep you alive. Less than 5% - much less for those who aren't killing themselves in the gym - comes from the daily activity level(s) you impose yourself, like exercising.

Second, and just as important - this (caloric restriction + killing yourself in the gym) is completely unsustainable as a way of living, and when you stop, the weight piles back on and then some.

I know. I experienced this very cycle of weight loss/gain for 30 years, before I finally learned the truth and got off thus false claim treadmill.

But are you saying that is causing unhealthy fat loss?

No, I'm saying it simply doesn't work. If it did, weight watchers, and personal trainers like Jillian Michaels would be out of bnusiness.

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

The toxoplasma gondi parasite is thought to infect about 50% of people worldwide

In a study of healthy college students, the sample of these students shown to be infected with this parasite were found to be more sexually attractive than the sample of these students who were not infected.

sexy parasite study

a reply to: InachMarbank

The disease of toxoplasmosis discussed in the popular 90s movie, Trainspotting.

youtu.be...

Also, a rant from Trainspotting comparing heroin to orgasms.

youtu.be...

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

With TG being so prevalent, at least 50% of the world infected, it doesn't seem like you can account for all that infection by blaming it on the fecal matter of cats and rats. Must be another reason.

a reply to: tanstaafl
Hey Thanks for the info..I have more questions

From your post-
" What actually happens is your body slows down your BMR (basal metabolic rate) to match the lowered amount of energy you are ingesting - actually, by a little more than what you lowered it. It does this as part of our innate survival mechanisms, in this case sensing that you are in a 'famine' state, so it needs to conserver energy. This is a huge problem, because it is your basal metabolic rate that determines 95+% of the number of 'calories' your body utilizes in any given 24 hour period simply to keep you alive. Less than 5% - much less for those who aren't killing themselves in the gym - comes from the daily activity level(s) you impose yourself, like exercising.

Second, and just as important - this (caloric restriction + killing yourself in the gym) is completely unsustainable as a way of living, and when you stop, the weight piles back on and then some."


OK,so a person is eating too much/junk diet and not excercising-Then they clean up their diet-eating a regular amount rather than over eating-and they start daily excersise.
Not "killing themselves" or over doing it-rather just doing a general daily routine that would more closely imitate our long history of being hunter gatherers-those folks weren't sitting in an office all day so for many millenia we were all doing much more daily excercise.

Does that really put them into a famine state?
Wouldn't they just start operating more efficiently as they are not putting excess strain on things like the digestive system/heart/liver?

I'm not sure if I get the idea of caloric restriction being fully bad-I have read some articles about it maybe extending lifespans-although that is contested by others-

Calorie restriction enters this equation because it is known that drastically reducing food intake will reduce metabolic rate. If less food is being consumed, then there is less food that the body has to process. Moreover, since calorie restriction generally results in weight loss, less energy overall is needed to maintain the reduced body mass. As a result of this reduction of metabolic rate, it is hypothesized that calorie restriction could extend lifespans by decreasing the rate of free radical damage.

sitn.hms.harvard.edu...

Last question-why do you say eating a sensible amount and doing daily excercise is not sustainable long term?
I get it isn't doable every single day-everyone gets ill or injured sometimes-but both sensible eating and excercise can be turned into a habit or discipline of sorts which can just become routine behaviour.
Cheers


Apologies for off topicing,carry on with the parasites folks.

originally posted by: rounda
a reply to: tanstaafl
What? Calorie in/calorie out is literally the one thing that has never been debunked.

Yeah... except it thoroughly has.

Kind of impossible to debunk it, really, since it's basic thermodynamics.

Are you under the mistaken belief that our bodies follow the laws of thermodynamics?

Basically every diet fad ends up being a highly restrictive calorie in/calorie out diet.

I agree... not sure what that has to do with anything though.

Take keto for instance.

Except it is as far from a 'fad diet' as you can get.

Of course, there are those out to profit from it by trying to sell you a bunch of garbage 'keto' snack foods that aren't much better than regular garbage junk food, but that is the only aspect of keto that can be described as a fad.

Human beings have been primarily living a keto lifestyle and way of eating for millions of years.

You eat red meat, and cook it in fat. You feel satiated for longer periods of time because both protein and fat make you feel full.

No, you don't 'feel' full, you ARE full. There is a difference.

Do you know how hard it is to eat 4 steaks a day?

Irrelevant... but I only eat one 2-3lb steak per day (when I'm eating steak). sometimes I eat a dozen eggs, 6 or 8 pieces of sugar free bacon.

I'd be surprised if people on keto eat more than 1200 calories a day.

People who are ignorant on a topic really should refrain from commenting on it, as all they do is ... reveal their ignorance to anyone reading/listening.

I eat anywhere from 2500 to 3500 'calories' per day, although the word 'calorie' is terribly wrongly used when it comes to the body's utilization of food, as I explained in the post you either didn't read, or more likely just didn't comprehend.

Intermittent fasting is the same thing.

No, it isn't. IF is simply eating within a certain window of time every 24 hour period, and most importantly, NOT eating outside that window. Meaning, no snacking. At all.

Most people aren't going to eat their daily required calories during their eating period, so they're left with a calorie deficit.

You are wrong. The only people who do this fail at the most basic level of the general rule:

Eat when you're hungry, and when you eat, eat to satiation.

Once you are fat adapted, this is extremely easy. Your body is marvelous at communicating these things to you, when it is metabolically healthy.

Calorie in/calorie out ALWAYS works.

Nope. If it did, as I said before, Weight Watchers, and personal trainers like Jillian Michaels, would be out of jobs.

The problem is most people don't know how many calories they burn every day

The problem with this comment is, human beings don't 'burn' calories, they utilize energy from food they eat, after it is broken down bio-chemically.

We are not bomb calorimeters, which is the tool used to define a calorie.

because they don't use an accurate heart meter to figure it out, and they don't get accurate serving sizes of the food they do eat and miscount their calories.

More ignorance on display. I'm at a loss as to how you might think something called a 'heart meter' might play apart in anything, but anyone who 'counts calories' is doing it wrong.