!!!Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated!!! One Year Later…

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Narvasis
Hello ATS!!
It’s your old pal posing another very simple question to the community. Specifically to people that are pro covid shots. The question is this:

If the covid shots were never tested for transmission before market, how was it a “!!!PANDEMIC OF THE UNVACCINATED!!!”?

Please answer the question without deflections to other subjects. It’s a simple question, it should have a simple response. That’s all that many heard for MONTHS. That it’s because of unvaccinated people that others are getting sick still. That “covid stops with you”.

Please explain this to me in a logical way that makes sense.

These products clearly don't prevent infection and transmission.

It's that simple!

And these products were sold through coercion, propaganda and now we are finding out, false advertising. In normal times, a product like this would be pulled and the corporate entity behind it would be facing the courts. Normal seems like a long time ago.

a reply to: igloo

IDK I am asking my Dr about Prevnar 20.

=P jk

originally posted by: Mandroid7

Pureblood here...
I don't know why you even bother talking to all those jabbers.
They technically aren't even real humans anymore AND they smell like protein constantly.

If you ever need blood howl at the moon for me because I'll donate mine, just don't be surprised if you wake up angrier than normal or have visions of # you don't understand, all part of it and all that =P probably make sure I get a couple shots in before the transfuse just to hook you up homie

I am by no means a shot enthusiast, however try and follow this thinking.

The shot never vaccinated anyone from anything, therefore everyone was unvaccinated, and the media beat the drums of pestilence.

Viola.

one (1) pandemic of the unvaccinated.

It’s called mockery.

a reply to: Narvasis

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
I understand your anger.

However, we are beyond that.

No sane human really cares anymore.


The ones that care, are , beyond 'saving'

a reply to: Narvasis

Speak for yourself.

many of the unvaxed do still care,
many of the vaxed do still blame us.

A lot still care

It's not my opinion that the pandemic wasn't/isn't real. I just don't trust the jabs.

I've seen many with covid, for most it was just like a flu, one close friend ended up in a coma and is still not recovered.
This close 'friend' however, doesn't want me to come anywhere near him ever again, because I'm unvaccinated.

So the thing is, they got into peoples minds, saying that it's a pandemic of the unvaccinated, and a lot are still stuck with that idea. I know for a fact that it isn't, this unvaxed never got covid so far while almost all the vaxed around me did.

In my country, people received their invitation to get the fall booster shot. A month ago, almost everyone said " I'm not getting it, it doesn't work".... and guess what? Right now, they are all standing in line, like the good sheep that they are, and take their jabs. Even though they all know it isn't mandatory, they have a choice...

where are all the suck-ups? I'd have thought the Fauci followers would defend this.
must all be zombies by now.

There's not a great deal to say really is there.

Pandemic of the unvaccinated sounds like something political as opposed to scientific.

There's also a limit to the amount of abuse you can take in one day so I'm personally saving my interaction for later on when I've got some real world stuff out of the way.




a reply to: network dude

originally posted by: Athetos
Some people want to hold politicians and pharma and media accountable for their action like any sane rational person.
The rest must be those useless eaters I keep hearing so much about.
a reply to: chris_stibrany

Pfizer would never give me a drug they didn't spend plenty of time and money thoroughly researching. And no rational US citizen would defend a multibillion dollar pharmaceutical company if they chose not to do thorough testing.... right?

a reply to: nonspecific

Did you gain anything by defending Pfizer's products? You at least got some compensation right? Don't tell me you were doing volunteer work for a company that makes billions of dollars lol

Yeah I got a huge was of cash for spreading lies online.

I'm retired now.





a reply to: Tekner

a reply to: Dalamax

The shot never vaccinated anyone from anything, therefore everyone was unvaccinated, and the media beat the drums of pestilence.

With your permission, I'd like to pinch that please.
Rainbows
Jane

a reply to: chris_stibrany

# THAT!

Speak for yourself; you got a mouse in your pocket?

originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
a reply to: Narvasis

They knew from the start that the unvaxed were a threat.

We are the unwanted control group for their little global experiment.

The “pandemic of the unvaccinated” was part of their campaign of propaganda to reduce this threat as much as they could.

Can’t have a bunch of healthy people walking around with something inconvenient in common.

You are making a very good point here.
The only frame of reference for which proper comparisons can be made is the group of the unvaccinated.

They have been trying to eliminate this group by vaccinating everyone and hence deceive everyone.

The propaganda was and still is unprecedented.
Normality must be restored and we need decent lawmakers, lawyers, and judiciary. The rest will follow.

originally posted by: Tekner
a reply to: nonspecific

Did you gain anything by defending Pfizer's products? You at least got some compensation right? Don't tell me you were doing volunteer work for a company that makes billions of dollars lol

Yes indeed I have noticed this too.
Some members defend and have defended the pharmaceutical companies as well as their products which are known not to be safe as safety hasn't been established. It's what we call vaccine apologetics and denialism of facts.

originally posted by: nonspecific
There's not a great deal to say really is there.

Pandemic of the unvaccinated sounds like something political as opposed to scientific.

There's also a limit to the amount of abuse you can take in one day so I'm personally saving my interaction for later on when I've got some real world stuff out of the way.




a reply to: network dude

no offence, but you are a bit weak in the "I'm going to kill you" department. While you have been a bit vax happy, you still show signs of intelligent life. You weren't the prey I was hoping would come along.

The one's who argued against natural immunity, and puked up the official narrative about shaming those who didn't want the shot need a bit of love. (IMHO). If the information doesn't change soon, most won't be able to deny the reality.

Not sure that talking about me in that manner is entirely appropriate and with the terms and conditions of the group but you seem to lack the decency most members here do.




a reply to: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: nonspecific
There's not a great deal to say really is there.

Pandemic of the unvaccinated sounds like something political as opposed to scientific.

There's also a limit to the amount of abuse you can take in one day so I'm personally saving my interaction for later on when I've got some real world stuff out of the way.




a reply to: network dude

no offence, but you are a bit weak in the "I'm going to kill you" department. While you have been a bit vax happy, you still show signs of intelligent life. You weren't the prey I was hoping would come along.

The one's who argued against natural immunity, and puked up the official narrative about shaming those who didn't want the shot need a bit of love. (IMHO). If the information doesn't change soon, most won't be able to deny the reality.

I am new here so I missed these wonderful conversations where natural immunity was criminalised and condemned.

But imagine one claims that vaccine immunity is superior to natural immunity?!

Let's say you produce antibodies only against one antigenic site and on the other hand against 26 or 27. I can't remember exactly.

It's the same people who in the absence of evidence and absence of knowledge of basic principles in biology and immunology, argue on the basis of politics and ideology.

No offence taken, as I've said countless times now I think I'm less pro Vax than I am anti "antivax dumb # spreading"

I like the truth and I enjoy learning but when members claim that the vaccines will kill us all or make us magnetic or whatever the other nonsense we've had crops up I can't just sit by and not get involved.

I'm sure if I went back and looked I'd find plenty of examples of me saying how I don't really trust Pfizer, I had the Oxford jabs and had to travel a fair way to get them over Pfizer.

I wanted something created by the boffins at Oxford university and made and rolled out not for profit not the Pfizer jab and that's what I did.

In the eyes of most I'm still evil but that's mainly because they don't actually read or understand what is actually said to them.



a reply to: network dude